RSPD - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Broad Consumer Discretionary Exposure
The fund holds many different consumer-focused companies, spreading risk across a wide range of businesses that benefit when consumer spending is healthy.
Equal-Weight Approach
Each stock has a similar weight in the portfolio, so performance is not overly dependent on just one or two mega-cap names like Amazon.
Several Strong-Performing Holdings
Key positions such as Garmin, Marriott, eBay, Hilton, Ralph Lauren, DR Horton, and Amazon have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the ETF’s overall returns.
Negative Factors
Heavy Sector Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in consumer cyclical stocks, the fund is highly sensitive to economic slowdowns and changes in consumer spending.
Limited Geographic Diversification
Almost all holdings are U.S.-based, so the ETF offers little protection if the U.S. market or economy weakens.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which can gradually reduce net returns for long-term investors.
RSPD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM274.35M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.91
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 01, 2006
Dividend Yield1.01%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume37,267
30 Day Avg. Volume56,875
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
66.27Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering49
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSPD Summary
RSPD is an ETF that follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary index, focusing on U.S. companies that benefit when people spend on non‑essential items like travel, online shopping, cars, and clothing. It spreads its money evenly across many well-known names, including Amazon and eBay, as well as travel brands like Marriott and Booking Holdings. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek growth from consumer spending while getting diversification across many different companies instead of betting on just one. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to consumer spending, so it can go up or down sharply with the economy.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, meaning you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds that track market-cap weighted indices.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPD ETF could benefit from strong consumer spending trends, particularly in the U.S., as well as innovations in the automotive and retail industries, which are key areas of focus for its holdings. However, economic challenges like rising interest rates or a potential recession could negatively impact consumer discretionary spending, which is cyclical and sensitive to broader economic conditions. Regulatory changes or supply chain disruptions affecting top holdings like Tesla or Ford could also pose risks to the fund's performance.
RSPD Top 10 Holdings
RSPD is a pure U.S. consumer‑discretionary play, and its story right now is about travel, e-commerce, and a few surprise standouts. Garmin has been a quiet engine for the fund, with its steady climb helping offset bumps elsewhere. Marriott, Hilton, and Ralph Lauren are also rising, suggesting resilient demand for travel and premium brands. Amazon remains a core driver, adding a bit of Big Tech flavor to the mix. On the flip side, Booking and Expedia have been lagging, keeping the fund from fully capitalizing on consumer strength.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carvana Co | 2.72% | $7.66M | $89.63B | 68.40% | 66 Neutral | |
| Amazon | 2.55% | $7.15M | $2.84T | 39.12% | 71 Outperform | |
| Hilton Worldwide Holdings | 2.32% | $6.53M | $76.79B | 50.02% | 67 Neutral | |
| MGM Resorts | 2.32% | $6.51M | $10.12B | 25.89% | 63 Neutral | |
| DR Horton | 2.32% | $6.51M | $45.34B | 27.29% | 66 Neutral | |
| Marriott International | 2.29% | $6.44M | $97.27B | 52.23% | 62 Neutral | |
| eBay | 2.27% | $6.37M | $43.88B | 51.22% | 70 Outperform | |
| Ralph Lauren | 2.27% | $6.37M | $22.48B | 66.88% | 78 Outperform | |
| Garmin | 2.26% | $6.35M | $49.93B | 28.26% | 74 Outperform | |
| Pool | 2.21% | $6.23M | $8.53B | -22.67% | 65 Neutral |
RSPD Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
55.70
Negative
57.00
Negative
56.66
Negative
Market Momentum
0.11
Positive
47.84
Neutral
9.10
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPD, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 55.81, equal to the 50-day MA of 55.70, and equal to the 200-day MA of 56.66, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of 0.11 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 47.84 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 9.10 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPD.
RSPD Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
55.37
6.05
12.27%
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
―
―
―
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
PEJ
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents