RSPD - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD)

Rating:69Neutral

Price Target:―

RSPD, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to strong contributors like Ulta Beauty, Darden Restaurants, and Garmin, which show healthy financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and supportive long-term growth strategies. However, holdings such as Hasbro, Starbucks, and Yum! Brands face issues like high debt, weaker profitability, and bearish technical trends, which weigh on the fund’s rating. The main risk factor is that many top holdings share similar challenges around leverage and valuation, which can increase the fund’s sensitivity to shifts in market sentiment toward consumer discretionary stocks.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings Performance

Many of the largest positions, including well-known consumer brands, have shown strong gains this year, helping support the ETF’s overall results.

Equal-Weight Approach

The fund spreads its investments fairly evenly across its holdings, reducing the risk of any single stock dominating performance.

Focused Consumer Exposure

With most assets in consumer-related companies, the ETF offers targeted exposure to a part of the market that can benefit when consumer spending is healthy.

Negative Factors

High Sector Concentration

The portfolio is heavily tilted toward consumer cyclical stocks, which can be more sensitive to economic slowdowns and changes in consumer spending.

Limited Geographic Diversification

Almost all holdings are U.S.-based, so the fund offers little protection if the U.S. market or economy weakens.

Moderate Expense Ratio

The fund’s fees are not especially low, which can slightly reduce long-term returns compared with cheaper index ETFs.

RSPD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM264.09M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.40%

Beta0.91

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateNov 01, 2006

Dividend Yield1.14%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume36,509

30 Day Avg. Volume57,387

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

66.42

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering49

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

RSPD Summary

RSPD is an ETF that follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary index, focusing on U.S. companies that benefit when people spend on non‑essential items like restaurants, travel, and retail. Instead of letting the biggest companies dominate, it gives each stock a similar weight. Well-known holdings include Starbucks and Lowe’s. Investors might consider RSPD if they want growth potential tied to consumer spending and a more balanced mix of companies within this sector. A key risk is that it is heavily focused on consumer discretionary stocks, so it can rise or fall sharply with changes in consumer spending and the overall economy.

How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, meaning you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds that track market-cap weighted indices.

What would affect this ETF?The RSPD ETF could benefit from strong consumer spending trends, particularly in the U.S., as well as innovations in the automotive and retail industries, which are key areas of focus for its holdings. However, economic challenges like rising interest rates or a potential recession could negatively impact consumer discretionary spending, which is cyclical and sensitive to broader economic conditions. Regulatory changes or supply chain disruptions affecting top holdings like Tesla or Ford could also pose risks to the fund's performance.

RSPD Top 10 Holdings

RSPD is riding a wave of consumer spending, with travel, leisure, and lifestyle names doing much of the heavy lifting. Cruise operators like Norwegian, Carnival, and Royal Caribbean have been rising as demand rebounds, while hotel chains Marriott and Hilton add steady momentum to the reopening theme. On the retail and lifestyle side, Tapestry and Deckers are also climbing, helped by strong brand appeal, and Garmin is quietly contributing with solid results. With a U.S.-only, consumer-cyclical tilt and no single giant in charge, the fund’s story is broad-based but clearly tied to discretionary spending trends.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
TPR	Tapestry	2.65%	$6.99M	$28.89B	104.66%	69 Neutral
SBUX	Starbucks	2.61%	$6.89M	$114.14B	4.31%	56 Neutral
HAS	Hasbro	2.53%	$6.68M	$13.38B	60.39%	56 Neutral
ROST	Ross Stores	2.52%	$6.66M	$67.87B	70.19%	80 Outperform
GRMN	Garmin	2.45%	$6.47M	$45.37B	12.59%	74 Outperform
DRI	Darden Restaurants	2.42%	$6.39M	$22.85B	9.55%	76 Outperform
MAR	Marriott International	2.41%	$6.36M	$83.82B	33.30%	62 Neutral
YUM	Yum! Brands	2.41%	$6.35M	$43.80B	3.28%	59 Neutral
EBAY	eBay	2.38%	$6.28M	$40.32B	40.08%	70 Outperform
HLT	Hilton Worldwide Holdings	2.37%	$6.26M	$67.47B	32.68%	67 Neutral

RSPD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Negative

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

58.36

Negative

100DMA

57.28

Negative

200DMA

56.40

Negative

Market Momentum

MACD

-1.03

Positive

RSI

26.54

Positive

STOCH

9.53

Positive

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPD, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 57.61, equal to the 50-day MA of 58.36, and equal to the 200-day MA of 56.40, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -1.03 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 26.54 is Positive, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 9.53 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPD.

RSPD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RSPD	―	―	$264.09M	0.40%	69 Neutral
RSPN	―	―	$898.78M	0.40%	72 Outperform
FXH	―	―	$884.13M	0.61%	71 Outperform
XRT	―	―	$629.68M	0.35%	68 Neutral
FXD	―	―	$268.21M	0.60%	69 Neutral
PEJ	―	―	$253.39M	0.57%	70 Neutral

Performance Comparison

RSPD

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF

54.08

4.03

8.05%

RSPN

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF

―

FXH

First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund

―

XRT

SPDR S&P Retail ETF

―

FXD

First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund

―

PEJ

Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents