RSPD - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD)

Rating:67Neutral

Price Target:―

The overall rating of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) reflects a mix of strong performers and some challenges among its top holdings. Expedia and TJX Companies stand out as key contributors, driven by robust financial performance, positive earnings sentiment, and strategic growth initiatives. However, holdings like Marriott International and Lululemon weigh on the fund's rating due to concerns over financial leverage, valuation risks, and market-specific challenges. A notable risk factor for the ETF is its concentration in the consumer discretionary sector, which can be sensitive to economic cycles.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings

Several key holdings, such as Tesla and Tapestry, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF’s overall returns.

Focused Sector Exposure

The ETF’s heavy allocation to consumer discretionary stocks allows investors to benefit from potential growth in this sector.

Reasonable Expense Ratio

The fund’s expense ratio is competitive for a specialized ETF, helping investors retain more of their returns.

Negative Factors

Sector Concentration Risk

With nearly all assets in consumer discretionary stocks, the ETF is highly exposed to risks specific to this sector.

Mixed Holding Performance

Some top holdings, like Chipotle and Lululemon, have underperformed year-to-date, which could drag on overall returns.

Limited Geographic Diversification

The ETF is entirely focused on U.S. companies, offering no exposure to international markets for diversification.

RSPD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM209.65M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.40%

Beta0.90

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateNov 01, 2006

Dividend Yield1.07%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume46,277

30 Day Avg. Volume32,210

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

64.13

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering50

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

RSPD Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) is a fund that focuses on companies in the consumer discretionary sector, which includes businesses like retail, automotive, and leisure services. It uses an equal weight strategy, meaning every company in the fund has the same influence on its performance. Some well-known companies in this ETF are Tesla and Chipotle. Investors might consider RSPD for diversification and to benefit from growth in industries tied to consumer spending. However, since it focuses on consumer discretionary stocks, its performance can be affected by changes in consumer habits or economic downturns.

How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, meaning you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds that track market-cap weighted indices.

What would affect this ETF?The RSPD ETF could benefit from strong consumer spending trends, particularly in the U.S., as well as innovations in the automotive and retail industries, which are key areas of focus for its holdings. However, economic challenges like rising interest rates or a potential recession could negatively impact consumer discretionary spending, which is cyclical and sensitive to broader economic conditions. Regulatory changes or supply chain disruptions affecting top holdings like Tesla or Ford could also pose risks to the fund's performance.

RSPD Top 10 Holdings

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) is riding the wave of consumer spending, with standout performances from names like Ralph Lauren and Las Vegas Sands, which are benefiting from strong revenue growth and strategic expansions. Retailers like Ross Stores and TJX Companies are also contributing steady gains, thanks to robust sales and profitability. However, Tesla is losing some steam, with valuation concerns and recent underperformance weighing on its momentum. With a heavy focus on U.S. consumer cyclical stocks, this fund is well-positioned to capture the sector’s growth, though it remains vulnerable to shifts in consumer sentiment.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
GM	General Motors	2.66%	$5.61M	$67.92B	31.19%	75 Outperform
LVS	Las Vegas Sands	2.62%	$5.53M	$46.15B	32.73%	74 Outperform
TSLA	Tesla	2.57%	$5.42M	$1.42T	28.14%	73 Outperform
EXPE	Expedia	2.50%	$5.28M	$31.57B	39.31%	81 Outperform
ROST	Ross Stores	2.49%	$5.26M	$57.79B	14.72%	79 Outperform
RL	Ralph Lauren	2.49%	$5.24M	$22.52B	66.71%	78 Outperform
MAR	Marriott International	2.43%	$5.13M	$81.75B	6.67%	62 Neutral
F	Ford Motor	2.42%	$5.10M	$52.56B	18.83%	74 Outperform
LULU	Lululemon Athletica	2.32%	$4.90M	$22.51B	-43.06%	67 Neutral
TJX	TJX Companies	2.29%	$4.84M	$170.42B	21.18%	80 Outperform

RSPD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

56.18

Positive

100DMA

56.49

Negative

200DMA

53.71

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

-0.32

Negative

RSI

57.61

Neutral

STOCH

81.34

Negative

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 54.77, equal to the 50-day MA of 56.18, and equal to the 200-day MA of 53.71, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of -0.32 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 57.61 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 81.34 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPD.

RSPD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RSPD	―	―	$209.65M	0.40%	―
FXH	―	―	$956.25M	0.62%	―
IETC	―	―	$931.55M	0.18%	―
XRT	―	―	$429.36M	0.35%	―
FXD	―	―	$289.68M	0.61%	―
PEJ	―	―	$253.08M	0.57%	―

Performance Comparison

RSPD

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF

56.47

1.31

2.37%

FXH

First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund

―

IETC

iShares Evolved US Technology ETF

―

XRT

SPDR S&P Retail ETF

―

FXD

First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund

―

PEJ

Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents