tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSPN - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPN

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) achieves a solid overall rating, driven by strong contributions from holdings like Caterpillar (CAT) and Quanta Services (PWR). Caterpillar's robust financial performance and strategic growth initiatives, along with Quanta Services' record revenue growth and profitability, bolster the fund's rating. However, some holdings, such as JB Hunt (JBHT), face challenges like soft demand and rising costs, which may slightly weigh on the ETF's overall score. A key risk factor is the potential overvaluation and overbought conditions across several top holdings, which could impact future performance.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several top holdings, such as GE Aerospace and EMCOR Group, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, boosting the ETF’s returns.
Sector Focus on Industrials
The ETF’s heavy exposure to the industrials sector benefits from steady demand and growth in infrastructure and manufacturing.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is competitive for a sector-focused fund, allowing investors to keep more of their returns.
Negative Factors
Over-Concentration in Industrials
Nearly 89% of the portfolio is allocated to industrials, making the fund highly sensitive to sector-specific risks.
Limited Geographic Diversification
With almost 100% exposure to U.S. companies, the ETF lacks protection against global market opportunities or risks.
Mixed Performance Among Holdings
Some holdings, like JB Hunt and Lockheed Martin, have shown weak or flat performance, which may drag on overall returns.

RSPN vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPN Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) is a fund that focuses on companies in the industrials sector, such as transportation, aerospace, and construction machinery. It uses an equal-weight strategy, meaning every company in the fund has the same influence, which helps balance exposure between big names like Caterpillar and emerging players. This ETF could be a good choice for investors looking to benefit from growth in infrastructure and manufacturing while diversifying within the industrial sector. However, since it focuses heavily on industrials, its performance may be impacted by economic cycles or slowdowns in manufacturing demand.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, meaning you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds that track market-cap-weighted indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) could benefit from increased infrastructure spending, advancements in manufacturing technology, and growing demand for transportation and aerospace services, which align with its industrial sector focus. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for industrial companies, and economic slowdowns that could reduce demand for industrial goods and services. Its U.S.-centric exposure also makes it sensitive to domestic regulatory changes and trade policies.

RSPN Top 10 Holdings

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) is riding on the strength of industrial stalwarts like Caterpillar and CH Robinson, both showing steady upward momentum thanks to solid financial performance and strategic execution. Expeditors International also adds a boost with its robust balance sheet and strong technical trends. However, lagging names like JB Hunt and Fortive are holding the fund back, weighed down by soft demand and revenue challenges. With its heavy focus on U.S. industrials, the ETF offers a balanced yet sector-concentrated play on infrastructure and manufacturing growth.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Caterpillar1.69%$11.26M$268.49B42.12%
76
Outperform
JB Hunt1.59%$10.56M$16.51B-8.88%
65
Neutral
CH Robinson1.56%$10.37M$18.85B51.58%
71
Outperform
Cummins1.55%$10.27M$68.62B33.98%
72
Outperform
Expeditors International1.54%$10.23M$19.75B21.53%
67
Neutral
FedEx1.54%$10.20M$65.08B-9.08%
75
Outperform
Huntington Ingalls1.46%$9.73M$12.33B57.65%
74
Outperform
Quanta Services1.46%$9.70M$68.66B33.87%
76
Outperform
Rockwell Automation1.46%$9.69M$44.23B33.58%
71
Outperform
United Parcel1.43%$9.48M$81.17B-29.49%
72
Outperform

RSPN Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
55.52
Positive
100DMA
55.41
Positive
200DMA
52.76
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.20
Negative
RSI
56.10
Neutral
STOCH
73.87
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPN, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 55.13, equal to the 50-day MA of 55.52, and equal to the 200-day MA of 52.76, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of -0.20 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 56.10 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 73.87 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPN.

RSPN Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$653.56M0.40%
$719.34M0.38%
$347.52M0.60%
$276.48M0.57%
$175.54M0.75%
$135.02M0.29%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF
55.81
1.32
2.42%
IYT
iShares US Transportation ETF
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
PSCI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement