tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

PEJ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PEJ

Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ)

Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:
PEJ, the Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects generally strong but somewhat uneven holdings in the travel, entertainment, and services space. Standout positions like DoorDash, United Airlines, Uber, and Las Vegas Sands support the fund’s quality through strong financial performance, positive outlooks, and growth-focused strategies, while names such as Biglari Holdings and Madison Square Garden Entertainment are held back by overvaluation and profitability challenges. The main risk is the fund’s concentration in cyclical leisure and entertainment businesses, which can be sensitive to economic slowdowns and shifts in consumer spending.
Positive Factors
Targeted Leisure & Entertainment Exposure
The fund focuses on leisure and entertainment companies, giving investors a direct way to benefit if consumer spending in these areas improves.
Concentrated Yet Multi-Sector Mix
While it is focused on leisure, the ETF still spreads holdings across consumer cyclical, communication services, industrials, consumer defensive, and technology, reducing reliance on just one industry group.
Several Strong Recent Stock Performers
Some top holdings like Sysco, Uber, Biglari Holdings, and Madison Square Garden Entertainment have shown strong recent performance, helping offset weaker names in the portfolio.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high fee for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Weak Recent Fund Performance
The ETF has delivered weak results so far this year and over the past month, signaling recent headwinds for its strategy.
Concentration in U.S. Consumer Cyclical Names
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks and a heavy tilt toward consumer cyclical companies, the fund is sensitive to downturns in the U.S. economy and discretionary spending.

PEJ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PEJ Summary

The Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) tracks the Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment Int Index, focusing on U.S. companies tied to travel, dining, and fun experiences. It holds well-known names like Hilton and Uber, along with airlines, casinos, restaurants, and entertainment firms that benefit when people spend more on trips, eating out, and events. Someone might invest in PEJ to seek growth from rising consumer spending on experiences and to get a mix of leisure-related companies in one fund. A key risk is that it can be hit hard during economic slowdowns, when people cut back on travel and entertainment, so its price can move up and down sharply.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) has an expense ratio of 0.57%, meaning you’ll pay $5.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on a specific sector rather than tracking a broad index. Active management typically involves more research and trading, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) could benefit from increased consumer spending on leisure and entertainment activities, especially as economic conditions improve and travel and dining trends grow. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can reduce discretionary spending, or economic slowdowns that impact consumer confidence. Additionally, regulatory changes or disruptions in the travel and entertainment industries could negatively affect some of its top holdings like Carnival or Live Nation Entertainment.

PEJ Top 10 Holdings

PEJ is leaning hard into U.S. leisure and entertainment, with a clear tilt toward travel, dining, and live events rather than broad consumer stocks. Hilton and United Airlines are helping steady the ship with generally rising trends over the past few months, while Warner Bros. and Live Nation look more mixed, occasionally losing steam as investors question growth and valuation. DoorDash and Las Vegas Sands have been notable laggards lately, dragging on returns, even as niche names like Biglari Holdings and Madison Square Garden Entertainment quietly provide a lift.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Warner Bros5.72%$14.41M$68.26B164.37%
68
Neutral
Live Nation Entertainment5.50%$13.85M$33.77B0.53%
69
Neutral
Sysco5.33%$13.42M$40.16B14.99%
71
Outperform
Hilton Worldwide Holdings5.17%$13.01M$69.38B16.57%
67
Neutral
DoorDash5.17%$13.01M$88.19B8.36%
76
Outperform
United Airlines Holdings5.08%$12.80M$33.12B-3.32%
74
Outperform
Uber Technologies4.54%$11.44M$166.33B19.74%
74
Outperform
Las Vegas Sands3.81%$9.60M$35.65B15.06%
74
Outperform
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.3.39%$8.55M$2.92B70.91%
64
Neutral
Biglari Holdings3.39%$8.52M$1.18B61.64%
64
Neutral

PEJ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
60.50
Negative
100DMA
59.97
Positive
200DMA
57.40
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.13
Positive
RSI
40.18
Neutral
STOCH
17.73
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PEJ, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 61.34, equal to the 50-day MA of 60.50, and equal to the 200-day MA of 57.40, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.13 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 40.18 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 17.73 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for PEJ.

PEJ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$254.94M0.57%
$991.43M0.19%
$974.47M0.38%
$486.49M0.35%
$316.72M0.61%
$228.28M0.40%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PEJ
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF
60.20
4.52
8.12%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
IHE
iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement