Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
PEJ - AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ)
Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
$64.00
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, like Warner Bros and DoorDash, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF’s overall returns.
Sector Focus on Growth Areas
The ETF is heavily weighted in Consumer Cyclical and Communication Services sectors, which tend to perform well during periods of economic growth.
Healthy Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has shown solid year-to-date gains, indicating resilience despite recent short-term volatility.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
With over 93% exposure to U.S. companies, the ETF lacks diversification across global markets.
Mixed Performance Among Holdings
Some top holdings, like Las Vegas Sands and Flutter Entertainment, have underperformed year-to-date, dragging on overall returns.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is higher than many passive funds, which could reduce long-term returns for investors.
PEJ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM336.66M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.57%
Beta1.09
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateJun 23, 2005
Dividend Yield0.13%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedDynamic Leisure & Entertainment Int Index (AMEX)
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume31,782
30 Day Avg. Volume36,629
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
68.47Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering32
PEJ Summary
The Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) is an investment fund that focuses on companies in the leisure and entertainment sector, such as hotels, restaurants, and travel services. It follows the Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment Int Index and includes well-known companies like Warner Bros and DoorDash. This ETF is designed to benefit from consumer spending on experiences and lifestyle trends, making it a good option for investors looking to diversify their portfolio or tap into growth in the consumer discretionary sector. However, new investors should be aware that this ETF is heavily influenced by consumer spending, which can fluctuate during economic downturns.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) has an expense ratio of 0.57%, meaning you’ll pay $5.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on a specific sector rather than tracking a broad index. Active management typically involves more research and trading, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) could benefit from increased consumer spending on leisure and entertainment activities, especially as economic conditions improve and travel and dining trends grow. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can reduce discretionary spending, or economic slowdowns that impact consumer confidence. Additionally, regulatory changes or disruptions in the travel and entertainment industries could negatively affect some of its top holdings like Carnival or Live Nation Entertainment.
PEJ Top 10 Holdings
The Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) is riding the wave of consumer discretionary spending, but its performance is a mixed bag. Warner Bros is a steady contributor, buoyed by strong subscriber growth, while DoorDash is rising thanks to operational efficiencies and strategic growth. On the flip side, Las Vegas Sands and Royal Caribbean are lagging, weighed down by high leverage and bearish momentum. The fund leans heavily into U.S.-based leisure and entertainment companies, with a clear focus on consumer cyclical stocks, making it a bet on experiential spending trends.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warner Bros | 9.44% | $31.26M | $53.53B | 165.93% | 69 Neutral | |
| Las Vegas Sands | 5.40% | $17.89M | $39.86B | 13.69% | 74 Outperform | |
| DoorDash | 5.26% | $17.41M | $108.54B | 62.14% | 72 Outperform | |
| Sysco | 4.83% | $15.99M | $35.77B | -0.33% | 71 Outperform | |
| Carnival | 4.58% | $15.15M | $36.85B | 28.77% | 73 Outperform | |
| Live Nation Entertainment | 4.58% | $15.15M | $34.33B | 26.36% | 60 Neutral | |
| Royal Caribbean | 4.14% | $13.71M | $77.60B | 37.89% | 68 Neutral | |
| Flutter Entertainment PLC | 3.95% | $13.09M | £30.91B | -1.52% | 59 Neutral | |
| Lyft | 3.30% | $10.93M | $8.03B | 52.27% | 67 Neutral | |
| Biglari Holdings | 3.27% | $10.83M | $1.11B | 112.59% | 69 Neutral |
PEJ Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
59.84
Negative
58.45
Positive
54.96
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.29
Positive
45.26
Neutral
16.31
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PEJ, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 58.77, equal to the 50-day MA of 59.84, and equal to the 200-day MA of 54.96, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.29 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 45.26 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 16.31 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for PEJ.
PEJ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
PEJ
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF
58.55
9.10
18.40%
IETC
iShares Evolved US Technology ETF
―
―
―
PSI
Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF
―
―
―
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
―
―
―
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents