tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

QDIV - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

QDIV

Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
QDIV, the Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects a portfolio of generally strong, income-focused large companies. High-quality holdings like Merck, with robust financial performance and promising growth from its drug pipeline, and Schlumberger, with solid profitability and positive momentum in key business segments, help support the fund’s quality profile. Some positions such as Colgate-Palmolive and Mosaic face challenges like high leverage, operational or cash flow pressures, and weaker technical trends, and the fund’s meaningful exposure to cyclical sectors like energy and materials is a key risk if market conditions turn against those industries.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the year so far and in recent months, indicating positive momentum.
Quality Dividend Leaders in Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Lockheed Martin, Schlumberger, and Constellation Brands, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively low for an actively selected, quality-dividend strategy, helping investors keep more of their returns.
Negative Factors
Small Asset Base
The ETF manages a modest amount of assets, which can sometimes mean less trading liquidity compared with larger, more established funds.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With nearly all assets in U.S. stocks, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Sector Tilts May Limit Balance
Large weights in consumer defensive, industrials, and health care mean the fund is less balanced across all sectors and may behave differently from the broader market.

QDIV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

QDIV Summary

QDIV is the Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF, which follows the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. It focuses on large, established U.S. companies that pay steady dividends and have strong finances. The fund holds well-known names like Target and Chevron, along with firms in defensive, industrial, health care, and energy sectors. Someone might invest in QDIV to seek a mix of regular dividend income and long-term growth from solid blue-chip stocks. A key risk is that stock prices and dividend payments can still go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) has an expense ratio of 0.20%, meaning you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is lower than average for actively managed funds, as QDIV tracks a specific index and focuses on high-quality dividend-paying companies, which typically require less frequent adjustments.
What would affect this ETF?The Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) could benefit from stable economic conditions and low interest rates, which often support dividend-paying companies and large-cap stocks. Positive trends in sectors like Consumer Defensive and Health Care, which are more resilient during economic uncertainty, may also provide stability. However, rising interest rates or economic downturns could negatively impact dividend-focused strategies, and sector-specific challenges in Energy or Industrials might pose risks to performance.

QDIV Top 10 Holdings

QDIV leans heavily on steady, dividend-rich U.S. blue chips, with a noticeable tilt toward defensive and industrial names. Lockheed Martin and Schlumberger are doing much of the heavy lifting, with both stocks rising and giving the fund an industrial and energy-powered engine. Merck adds a healthy dose of growth from pharma, while Target’s recovery story is helping rather than hurting for now. On the flip side, Mosaic and CF Industries have shown more mixed, sometimes lagging action, occasionally putting a small drag on this otherwise sturdy, income-focused portfolio.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Lockheed Martin2.23%$717.61K$140.16B40.32%
70
Outperform
Schlumberger2.12%$683.44K$74.03B26.24%
75
Outperform
PPG Industries2.12%$682.82K$27.92B10.16%
67
Neutral
Gilead Sciences2.11%$678.59K$185.32B58.79%
78
Outperform
Merck & Company2.10%$676.23K$297.22B39.70%
80
Outperform
Colgate-Palmolive2.10%$674.98K$76.48B8.82%
63
Neutral
Cf Industries Holdings2.05%$661.80K$14.24B10.22%
72
Outperform
Chevron2.03%$652.58K$360.88B18.50%
71
Outperform
Comcast2.02%$652.38K$110.99B-8.73%
74
Outperform
United Parcel2.00%$644.99K$98.88B3.74%
72
Outperform

QDIV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
35.54
Positive
100DMA
34.90
Positive
200DMA
34.16
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.70
Negative
RSI
77.96
Negative
STOCH
92.38
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QDIV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 36.64, equal to the 50-day MA of 35.54, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.16, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.70 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 77.96 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 92.38 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for QDIV.

QDIV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$32.18M0.20%
$97.58M0.60%
$96.43M0.70%
$94.47M0.30%
$94.43M0.79%
$93.57M0.15%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
38.50
4.98
14.86%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
BCUS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
XOEX
Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement