LVDS - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS)

Rating:72Outperform

Price Target:―

LVDS, the JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to high-quality leaders like Alphabet (GOOG), Micron (MU), and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), which bring strong financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and exposure to long-term growth areas such as AI, cloud, and healthcare. Large positions in stable financials like Wells Fargo and Bank of America also support the fund, though weaker technical trends and leverage concerns in holdings like Berkshire Hathaway B and Philip Morris slightly weigh on the rating. The main risk is the fund’s meaningful exposure to a few big names and sectors such as tech and financials, which could increase volatility if those areas face pressure.

Positive Factors

Solid Year-To-Date Performance

The fund has delivered positive results so far this year, showing it has been able to grow investors’ money recently.

Strong Top Holdings Mix

Several of the largest positions, including major technology and energy names, have shown strong gains, helping support the ETF’s overall performance.

Broad Sector Diversification

Holdings spread across financials, technology, industrials, health care, consumer sectors, and more help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.

Negative Factors

Recent Short-Term Weakness

The fund’s performance over the last three months has been negative, suggesting some recent pressure on returns.

Concentration in U.S. Market

With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy.

Underperforming Financial Holdings

Some large financial stocks in the top holdings have shown weak performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s results if the trend continues.

LVDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM92.40M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.30%

Beta0.76

IssuerJPMorgan

Inception DateJul 11, 2025

Dividend YieldN/A

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedNo Underlying Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume1,705

30 Day Avg. Volume5,360

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

60.24

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering131

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

LVDS Summary

The JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) is an actively managed fund that invests in large U.S. companies that its data-driven process believes are undervalued. It focuses on big, established names across many sectors, including financials, technology, and health care. Well-known holdings include Alphabet (Google) and Amazon. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth while staying diversified across many industries and blue-chip stocks. A key risk is that value stocks can stay out of favor for long periods, and the ETF’s share price can go up and down with the overall stock market.

How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) is 0.30%, which means you’ll pay $3 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed, using advanced data science techniques to select stocks with strong fundamentals and value potential.

What would affect this ETF?The LVDS ETF, focused on large-cap U.S. companies, could benefit from economic growth and advancements in data-driven stock selection, particularly if undervalued sectors like financials and industrials perform well. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could pressure financial stocks, or regulatory changes affecting top holdings like Alphabet and Amazon. Broader market volatility could also impact its diverse sector exposure.

LVDS Top 10 Holdings

LVDS leans heavily into U.S. value names, with big banks and old-guard blue chips steering the ship. Financials like Wells Fargo and Bank of America are trying to grind higher but remain a bit stuck in the mud this year, while Exxon Mobil and Philip Morris are doing more of the heavy lifting with steadily rising share prices. On the growthier side, Alphabet is holding its own, but Amazon is losing steam and acting as a drag. Micron’s powerful rally adds a tech spark, yet overall the fund still feels anchored in traditional, U.S.-centric value plays.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
GOOG	Alphabet Class C	2.96%	$2.73M	$3.67T	84.06%	82 Outperform
XOM	Exxon Mobil	2.63%	$2.42M	$639.72B	41.28%	74 Outperform
AMZN	Amazon	2.14%	$1.98M	$2.25T	8.07%	71 Outperform
WFC	Wells Fargo	1.99%	$1.84M	$232.19B	9.92%	80 Outperform
BRK.B	Berkshire Hathaway B	1.96%	$1.81M	$1.06T	-2.45%	66 Neutral
BAC	Bank of America	1.95%	$1.80M	$338.24B	18.80%	72 Outperform
RTX	RTX	1.78%	$1.64M	$272.54B	57.15%	74 Outperform
MU	Micron	1.74%	$1.60M	$456.23B	327.22%	79 Outperform
PM	Philip Morris	1.67%	$1.54M	$267.75B	14.29%	61 Neutral
JNJ	Johnson & Johnson	1.55%	$1.43M	$583.29B	48.50%	78 Outperform

LVDS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Negative

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

51.87

Negative

100DMA

50.23

Positive

200DMA

Market Momentum

MACD

-0.26

Positive

RSI

30.67

Neutral

STOCH

21.75

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For LVDS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 52.41, equal to the 50-day MA of 51.87, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.26 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 30.67 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 21.75 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for LVDS.

LVDS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
LVDS	―	―	$92.40M	0.30%	72 Outperform
UPSD	―	―	$99.70M	0.79%	70 Neutral
BCUS	―	―	$93.98M	0.70%	73 Outperform
ACEP	―	―	$86.35M	0.45%	69 Neutral
EGGY	―	―	$80.78M	0.89%	69 Neutral
HUSV	―	―	$75.90M	0.70%	71 Outperform

Performance Comparison

LVDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF

50.55

4.87

10.66%

UPSD

Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF

―

BCUS

Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF

―

ACEP

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF

―

EGGY

NestYield Dynamic Income Shield ETF

―

HUSV

First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents