LVDS - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS)

Rating:72Outperform

Price Target:―

LVDS, the JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by high-quality leaders like Alphabet (GOOG) and Micron (MU), which benefit from strong financial performance, positive earnings calls, and strategic positioning in fast-growing AI-related markets. Financial firms such as Wells Fargo (WFC) and Morgan Stanley (MS) also support the fund’s quality through solid profitability and positive momentum, though their high leverage and cash flow management needs add some risk. The main risk factor is the fund’s exposure to several highly valued, financially leveraged companies, which could increase volatility if market conditions or credit environments worsen.

Positive Factors

Solid Year-To-Date Performance

The fund has delivered positive results so far this year, showing it has been able to grow investors’ money recently.

Strong Top Holdings Mix

Several of the largest positions, including major technology and energy names, have shown strong gains, helping support the ETF’s overall performance.

Broad Sector Diversification

Holdings spread across financials, technology, industrials, health care, consumer sectors, and more help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.

Negative Factors

Recent Short-Term Weakness

The fund’s performance over the last three months has been negative, suggesting some recent pressure on returns.

Concentration in U.S. Market

With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy.

Underperforming Financial Holdings

Some large financial stocks in the top holdings have shown weak performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s results if the trend continues.

LVDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM94.22M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.30%

Beta0.70

IssuerJPMorgan

Inception DateJul 11, 2025

Dividend YieldN/A

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedNo Underlying Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume8,668

30 Day Avg. Volume6,311

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

58.30

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering131

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

LVDS Summary

The JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) is an actively managed fund that invests in large U.S. companies that its data-driven process believes are undervalued. It focuses on big, established names across many sectors, including financials, technology, and health care. Well-known holdings include Alphabet (Google) and Amazon. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth while staying diversified across many industries and blue-chip stocks. A key risk is that value stocks can stay out of favor for long periods, and the ETF’s share price can go up and down with the overall stock market.

How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) is 0.30%, which means you’ll pay $3 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed, using advanced data science techniques to select stocks with strong fundamentals and value potential.

What would affect this ETF?The LVDS ETF, focused on large-cap U.S. companies, could benefit from economic growth and advancements in data-driven stock selection, particularly if undervalued sectors like financials and industrials perform well. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could pressure financial stocks, or regulatory changes affecting top holdings like Alphabet and Amazon. Broader market volatility could also impact its diverse sector exposure.

LVDS Top 10 Holdings

LVDS leans heavily into U.S. large-cap value, with financials and a handful of big tech and industrial names steering the ship. Micron has been the star of the show, surging on AI and memory-chip optimism, while Alphabet and Amazon provide steady tech tailwinds without dominating the portfolio. On the value side, Exxon Mobil and RTX are quietly rising, adding some industrial and energy muscle. The main drag comes from the big banks and Berkshire Hathaway, which have been losing steam lately and acting as a brake on overall performance.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
GOOG	Alphabet Class C	2.82%	$2.66M	$3.67T	62.64%	82 Outperform
XOM	Exxon Mobil	2.52%	$2.38M	$635.44B	34.79%	74 Outperform
WFC	Wells Fargo	2.22%	$2.09M	$273.88B	11.37%	80 Outperform
BAC	Bank of America	2.07%	$1.95M	$384.86B	16.49%	72 Outperform
AMZN	Amazon	2.00%	$1.88M	$2.20T	-8.08%	71 Outperform
BRK.B	Berkshire Hathaway B	1.91%	$1.80M	$1.08T	3.14%	66 Neutral
PM	Philip Morris	1.77%	$1.67M	$284.36B	21.07%	61 Neutral
RTX	RTX	1.70%	$1.60M	$274.91B	64.18%	74 Outperform
MU	Micron	1.69%	$1.59M	$473.78B	304.49%	79 Outperform
JNJ	Johnson & Johnson	1.51%	$1.42M	$590.40B	54.63%	78 Outperform

LVDS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

51.07

Positive

100DMA

49.55

Positive

200DMA

Market Momentum

MACD

0.58

Positive

RSI

62.47

Neutral

STOCH

40.12

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For LVDS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 52.45, equal to the 50-day MA of 51.07, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.58 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 62.47 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 40.12 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for LVDS.

LVDS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
LVDS	―	―	$94.22M	0.30%	―
BCUS	―	―	$99.92M	0.70%	―
UPSD	―	―	$98.02M	0.79%	―
ACEP	―	―	$88.74M	0.45%	―
EGGY	―	―	$83.12M	0.89%	―
HUSV	―	―	$75.50M	0.70%	―

Performance Comparison

LVDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF

52.90

7.22

15.81%

BCUS

Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF

―

UPSD

Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF

―

ACEP

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF

―

EGGY

NestYield Dynamic Income Shield ETF

―

HUSV

First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents