ACEP - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, indicating solid recent results for investors.
Leading Technology and Energy Holdings
Several major positions in technology and energy, such as Lam Research, Seagate, Broadcom, Targa Resources, and Chevron, have shown strong or steady performance that supports the fund’s overall returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including technology, financials, energy, industrials, materials, health care, and consumer-related industries, which helps reduce reliance on any single part of the market.
Negative Factors
Moderate Fee Level
The expense ratio is not especially low, meaning investors give up a noticeable portion of returns each year in fees compared with cheaper index ETFs.
High U.S. Market Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in U.S. companies and very limited exposure to other countries, the fund is heavily tied to the health of the U.S. market.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions, such as IBM and Barrick Mining, have shown weaker or negative performance, which can drag on the ETF’s overall results despite stronger names elsewhere in the portfolio.
ACEP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM98.00M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.45%
Beta0.88
IssuerARS
Inception DateNov 20, 2025
Dividend Yield0.11%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume7,097
30 Day Avg. Volume2,393
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
23.13Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering36
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
ACEP Summary
ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) is an actively managed fund that invests mainly in large U.S. companies, with a focus on stocks that pay higher-than-average dividends. It doesn’t track a set index, but instead picks individual companies across many sectors, including technology, financials, energy, and more. Well-known holdings include Broadcom, IBM, JPMorgan Chase, and Chevron. Someone might consider ACEP for a mix of potential growth and regular income from dividends, along with broad diversification across industries. A key risk is that stock prices and dividend payments can go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which means you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) could benefit from strong performance in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as steady dividend payouts from large-cap companies like JPMorgan Chase and Walmart. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact dividend-paying stocks and sectors like financials and materials, which are also key components of this ETF. Additionally, regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting U.S.-focused companies could pose risks to its overall performance.
ACEP Top 10 Holdings
ACEP leans heavily into U.S. large-cap dividend payers, with a clear tech tilt led by Lam Research, Seagate, and Broadcom. Lam and Seagate have been rising, giving the fund a strong semiconductor engine, while Broadcom’s more mixed recent performance keeps that story from being a full sprint. Outside tech, Parker Hannifin and JPMorgan are steady contributors, adding industrial and financial ballast. IBM and Blackstone, however, have been lagging, occasionally acting like a headwind. Overall, it’s a U.S.-centric, tech-forward portfolio with a few value-oriented anchors.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lam Research | 4.79% | $4.68M | $439.46B | 226.68% | 77 Outperform | |
| ― | 4.76% | $4.65M | ― | ― | ― | |
| Seagate Tech | 4.18% | $4.08M | $183.90B | 485.12% | 68 Neutral | |
| Broadcom | 4.12% | $4.02M | $1.71T | 36.42% | 76 Outperform | |
| Parker Hannifin | 3.95% | $3.85M | $121.41B | 35.45% | 79 Outperform | |
| International Business Machines | 3.91% | $3.82M | $272.12B | 5.41% | 79 Outperform | |
| JPMorgan Chase | 3.68% | $3.59M | $896.22B | 19.96% | 72 Outperform | |
| Barrick Mining | 3.62% | $3.53M | $65.51B | 77.81% | 80 Outperform | |
| Targa Resources | 3.32% | $3.24M | $55.57B | 52.80% | 74 Outperform | |
| Blackstone Group | 3.25% | $3.17M | $149.98B | -19.33% | 72 Outperform |
ACEP Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
19.59
Positive
18.75
Positive
Market Momentum
0.04
Positive
55.74
Neutral
75.82
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ACEP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 19.84, equal to the 50-day MA of 19.59, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.04 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 55.74 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 75.82 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for ACEP.
ACEP Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
19.96
4.51
29.19%
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
JOYT
JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF
―
―
―
EGGQ
NestYield Visionary ETF
―
―
―
JHDG
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF
―
―
―
HUSV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents