tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

ACEP - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

ACEP

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
ACEP’s rating suggests it is a solid, but not top-tier, core equity ETF, supported by several strong, diversified holdings. High-quality names like Lam Research, Broadcom, Barrick, Parker Hannifin, and IBM contribute positively through strong financial performance, growth in areas like AI and aerospace, and generally supportive technical trends. The main risks come from valuation and leverage concerns across several holdings, along with some company-specific operational and regulatory challenges, which collectively prevent the fund from scoring higher.
Positive Factors
Strong Semiconductor Holdings
Key chip-related stocks like Lam Research, KLA, and Seagate have shown strong gains, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across technology, energy, financials, industrials, materials, and several smaller sectors, which can help reduce the impact of weakness in any one area.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF’s fee level is moderate for an actively managed equity fund, so costs are not excessively eating into returns.
Negative Factors
Heavy Tilt Toward Technology
With a large share of assets in technology stocks, the fund can be more sensitive to swings in the tech sector.
High U.S. Concentration
Most of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering limited geographic diversification outside the United States.
Recent Short-Term Weakness
The ETF has experienced a weak recent one-month performance, showing that it can be volatile over shorter time periods.

ACEP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

ACEP Summary

ACEP is the ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF, an actively managed fund that focuses on large U.S. companies, especially those paying higher-than-average dividends. It doesn’t track a set index, but instead picks stocks based on research into each company’s business and growth potential. The fund is heavy in technology, energy, and financial stocks, and holds well-known names like Broadcom and JPMorgan Chase. Someone might invest for a mix of income from dividends and long-term growth, but should know the value can go up and down with the stock market and tech sector swings.
How much will it cost me?The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which means you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) could benefit from strong performance in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as steady dividend payouts from large-cap companies like JPMorgan Chase and Walmart. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact dividend-paying stocks and sectors like financials and materials, which are also key components of this ETF. Additionally, regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting U.S.-focused companies could pose risks to its overall performance.

ACEP Top 10 Holdings

ACEP is leaning heavily on U.S. tech, with Seagate and Lam Research doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising on AI and chip-related optimism. IBM has also perked up lately, adding a steadier, dividend-friendly tech presence. On the flip side, Broadcom’s recent wobble and weakness in Barrick Mining have acted like sandbags on performance, while Parker Hannifin and Southern Copper have been more mixed. Overall, this is a U.S.-centric, tech-tilted fund with a supporting cast in materials, energy, and financials like JPMorgan.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Lam Research7.07%$7.02M$458.72B316.36%
77
Outperform
6.41%$6.37M
Seagate Tech4.77%$4.74M$208.77B677.47%
68
Neutral
Broadcom4.37%$4.34M$1.82T56.26%
76
Outperform
Parker Hannifin3.67%$3.65M$113.92B36.51%
79
Outperform
Barrick Mining3.67%$3.65M$67.34B95.38%
80
Outperform
Chevron3.49%$3.47M$372.87B23.54%
71
Outperform
Targa Resources3.42%$3.40M$58.51B55.94%
74
Outperform
JPMorgan Chase3.42%$3.40M$859.37B18.14%
72
Outperform
Southern Copper3.27%$3.25M$158.35B107.82%
73
Outperform

ACEP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
19.17
Positive
100DMA
18.43
Positive
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
0.23
Positive
RSI
63.18
Neutral
STOCH
70.28
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ACEP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 19.74, equal to the 50-day MA of 19.17, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.23 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 63.18 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 70.28 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for ACEP.

ACEP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$99.32M0.45%
69
Neutral
$97.98M0.49%
71
Outperform
$91.22M0.80%
68
Neutral
$89.95M0.22%
74
Outperform
$89.95M0.35%
74
Outperform
$87.51M0.93%
59
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
20.30
4.85
31.39%
JHDG
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
PQUS
Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF
JOYT
JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF
EGGQ
NestYield Visionary ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement