ACEP - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP)

Rating:71Outperform

Price Target:―

ACEP, the ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong, well-established companies like Newmont Mining and Lam Research, which benefit from robust financial performance, positive earnings call sentiment, and good growth positioning, including exposure to AI and advanced technologies. Additional support comes from holdings such as Parker Hannifin and Broadcom, which show strong results but carry higher valuations that add some risk. The main risk factor for the ETF is its meaningful exposure to cyclical and higher-valuation names in sectors like semiconductors and industrials, which could be more sensitive to market and regulatory shifts.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings

Several top holdings, including companies in technology and financials, have shown strong performance, supporting the ETF’s returns.

Sector Diversification

The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, reducing the risk of being overly reliant on one industry.

Moderate Expense Ratio

The ETF’s expense ratio is reasonable compared to many actively managed funds, helping investors keep more of their returns.

Negative Factors

High Concentration in Technology

With nearly 29% of the portfolio in technology, the ETF is heavily exposed to the performance of this single sector.

Limited Geographic Exposure

The ETF is heavily focused on U.S. companies, with minimal exposure to international markets, which could limit diversification.

Small Asset Base

The ETF has relatively low assets under management, which could lead to lower liquidity and higher trading costs for investors.

ACEP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM86.86M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.45%

Beta1.15

IssuerARS

Inception DateNov 20, 2025

Dividend Yield0.12%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedNo Underlying Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume4,272

30 Day Avg. Volume2,673

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

20.07

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering35

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

ACEP Summary

The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) is an actively managed fund that invests in large U.S. companies, focusing on those that pay higher-than-average dividends. It includes well-known names like JPMorgan Chase and Walmart, offering a mix of stability and growth potential. This ETF is a good choice for investors looking to earn income through dividends while also benefiting from potential stock price increases. However, since it invests heavily in large-cap companies, its performance can be affected by overall market trends, meaning its value may go up or down with the broader market.

How much will it cost me?The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which means you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight compared to passively managed funds that track an index.

What would affect this ETF?The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) could benefit from strong performance in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as steady dividend payouts from large-cap companies like JPMorgan Chase and Walmart. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact dividend-paying stocks and sectors like financials and materials, which are also key components of this ETF. Additionally, regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting U.S.-focused companies could pose risks to its overall performance.

ACEP Top 10 Holdings

ACEP is leaning heavily on U.S. tech, with Seagate, Lam Research, and KLA acting as the main engines of recent gains as chip-related names ride strong demand and upbeat earnings. Materials are the fund’s sturdy second pillar: Newmont and Freeport-McMoRan have been steadily climbing, giving the portfolio a lift when markets look for hard-asset safety. On the softer side, Broadcom and CRH have been more mixed lately, occasionally tapping the brakes. Overall, this is a U.S.-centric, tech-and-resources story with a few laggards but plenty of momentum at the top.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
STX	Seagate Tech	8.35%	$7.47M	$87.07B	363.15%	68 Neutral
LRCX	Lam Research	7.73%	$6.92M	$291.54B	196.17%	77 Outperform
NEM	Newmont Mining	5.72%	$5.11M	$122.60B	160.55%	81 Outperform
KLAC	KLA	5.46%	$4.88M	$187.62B	90.55%	77 Outperform
PH	Parker Hannifin	4.18%	$3.74M	$118.09B	36.83%	79 Outperform
JPM	JPMorgan Chase	3.62%	$3.24M	$832.71B	14.65%	72 Outperform
AVGO	Broadcom	3.50%	$3.13M	$1.57T	52.07%	76 Outperform
CRH	CRH plc	3.48%	$3.11M	$81.91B	12.62%	76 Outperform
	―	3.45%	$3.08M	―	―	―
FCX	Freeport-McMoRan	3.34%	$2.99M	$86.49B	69.44%	67 Neutral

ACEP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

100DMA

200DMA

Market Momentum

MACD

0.38

Negative

RSI

63.88

Neutral

STOCH

67.01

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ACEP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 17.40, equal to the 50-day MA of ―, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.38 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 63.88 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 67.01 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for ACEP.

ACEP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
ACEP	―	―	$86.86M	0.45%	―
BCUS	―	―	$99.42M	0.70%	―
UPSD	―	―	$95.75M	0.79%	―
LVDS	―	―	$94.11M	0.30%	―
EGGY	―	―	$86.21M	0.89%	―
HUSV	―	―	$72.57M	0.70%	―

Performance Comparison

ACEP

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF

17.83

2.38

15.40%

BCUS

Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF

―

UPSD

Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF

―

LVDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF

―

EGGY

NestYield Dynamic Income Shield ETF

―

HUSV

First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents