ACEP - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several top holdings, including companies in technology and financials, have shown strong performance, supporting the ETF’s returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, reducing the risk of being overly reliant on one industry.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is reasonable compared to many actively managed funds, helping investors keep more of their returns.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Technology
With nearly 29% of the portfolio in technology, the ETF is heavily exposed to the performance of this single sector.
Limited Geographic Exposure
The ETF is heavily focused on U.S. companies, with minimal exposure to international markets, which could limit diversification.
Small Asset Base
The ETF has relatively low assets under management, which could lead to lower liquidity and higher trading costs for investors.
ACEP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM84.74M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.45%
Beta1.25
IssuerARS
Inception DateNov 20, 2025
Dividend Yield0.13%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,956
30 Day Avg. Volume2,852
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
20.53Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering33
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
ACEP Summary
The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) is an actively managed fund that invests in large U.S. companies, focusing on those that pay higher-than-average dividends. It includes well-known names like JPMorgan Chase and Walmart, offering a mix of stability and growth potential. This ETF is a good choice for investors looking to earn income through dividends while also benefiting from potential stock price increases. However, since it invests heavily in large-cap companies, its performance can be affected by overall market trends, meaning its value may go up or down with the broader market.
How much will it cost me?The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which means you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) could benefit from strong performance in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as steady dividend payouts from large-cap companies like JPMorgan Chase and Walmart. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact dividend-paying stocks and sectors like financials and materials, which are also key components of this ETF. Additionally, regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting U.S.-focused companies could pose risks to its overall performance.
ACEP Top 10 Holdings
ACEP is leaning heavily into U.S. tech and industrial leaders, with Lam Research, Seagate, KLA, and Broadcom forming a powerful—but volatile—semiconductor spine. Lam, Seagate, and KLA have been rising on the back of AI and chip demand, giving the fund much of its recent lift, while Broadcom has been more mixed lately, adding some wobble to that story. On the value and income side, Newmont and Freeport-McMoRan are climbing with materials strength, while JPMorgan and CRH have been lagging, quietly tugging on overall returns.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ― | 7.53% | $6.45M | ― | ― | ― | |
| Lam Research | 6.25% | $5.35M | $264.99B | 169.66% | 77 Outperform | |
| Newmont Mining | 5.49% | $4.70M | $119.21B | 136.98% | 81 Outperform | |
| KLA | 4.85% | $4.15M | $185.95B | 98.97% | 77 Outperform | |
| Seagate Tech | 4.60% | $3.94M | $83.68B | 336.53% | 68 Neutral | |
| Parker Hannifin | 4.24% | $3.62M | $112.32B | 46.39% | 79 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 3.78% | $3.24M | $1.53T | 64.75% | 76 Outperform | |
| Walmart | 3.61% | $3.09M | $1.01T | 48.24% | 78 Outperform | |
| JPMorgan Chase | 3.56% | $3.05M | $764.45B | 21.94% | 72 Outperform | |
| RTX | 3.49% | $2.99M | $274.52B | 57.34% | 74 Outperform |
ACEP Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
17.62
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.11
Positive
42.81
Neutral
8.92
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ACEP, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 17.78, equal to the 50-day MA of 17.62, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.11 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 42.81 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 8.92 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for ACEP.
ACEP Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
17.32
1.87
12.10%
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
―
―
―
BCUS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF
―
―
―
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
―
―
―
EGGY
NestYield Dynamic Income Shield ETF
―
―
―
HUSV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents