tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RWLC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RWLC

Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF (RWLC)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
RWLC, the Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF, has a solid overall rating driven largely by its sizable positions in high-quality tech leaders like Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet, which benefit from strong financial performance, profitability, and long-term growth opportunities in AI, cloud, and services. Additional support comes from semiconductor names like KLA and Lam Research, which are well positioned in advanced technologies, though their high valuations and exposure to export-control risks, along with similar valuation and technical caution around holdings like Nvidia and Meta, slightly temper the fund’s overall appeal. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy tilt toward large technology and AI-related companies, which can increase sensitivity to sector-specific downturns and regulatory or valuation pressures.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month and quarter, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leadership in Technology and Growth Names
Many top holdings are major technology and growth companies, several of which have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s performance.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee level is reasonable for an actively managed, specialized strategy, helping investors keep more of their returns.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. stocks, which limits diversification across global markets.
Tech-Sector Dependence
A large share of the portfolio is in technology, making the ETF more sensitive to swings in that sector.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some of the largest positions, including major technology names, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which could drag on overall returns if the trend continues.

RWLC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RWLC Summary

Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF (RWLC) is a U.S.-focused stock fund that uses a rules-based, data-driven approach instead of tracking a traditional index. It mainly invests in large American companies across many sectors, with a big tilt toward technology. Well-known holdings include Apple and Nvidia. Someone might consider this ETF for broad stock market exposure and the potential for long-term growth, while still being diversified across different industries. However, it is heavily exposed to tech stocks and U.S. markets, so its value can rise and fall sharply when these areas are volatile.
How much will it cost me?The Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF (RAYD) has an expense ratio of 0.8%, meaning you’ll pay $8 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, using advanced data analytics and systematic strategies to optimize returns.
What would affect this ETF?The Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF (RAYD) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as strong performance from top companies like Nvidia and Microsoft. However, potential risks include economic slowdowns in developed markets or rising interest rates, which could negatively impact financial and consumer-focused sectors. Regulatory changes affecting major tech companies or broader market volatility could also pose challenges for this ETF.

RWLC Top 10 Holdings

RWLC is leaning hard into U.S. Big Tech and chipmakers, with names like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Amazon doing much of the heavy lifting. Nvidia and the semiconductor duo KLA and Lam Research are powering ahead, giving the fund a strong tailwind from the AI and hardware boom. Apple and Meta look more mixed, with Apple losing a bit of steam this year and Meta treading water, which slightly blunts the upside. Gilead adds a steadier health care note, but this ETF’s story is mostly a U.S. tech-and-AI play, not a global one.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Apple8.44%$7.38M$3.91T31.10%
79
Outperform
Nvidia6.85%$5.99M$4.86T90.26%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class A4.09%$3.58M$4.01T113.03%
85
Outperform
Alphabet Class C3.65%$3.19M$4.01T114.13%
82
Outperform
Microsoft3.13%$2.74M$3.15T11.78%
79
Outperform
Lam Research2.70%$2.36M$322.64B274.54%
77
Outperform
Mastercard2.66%$2.33M$456.03B-4.72%
75
Outperform
Amazon2.56%$2.24M$2.69T36.89%
71
Outperform
Gilead Sciences2.05%$1.80M$165.44B24.93%
78
Outperform
Altria Group1.95%$1.70M$108.05B11.02%
64
Neutral

RWLC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
33.02
Positive
100DMA
33.14
Positive
200DMA
32.76
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.52
Negative
RSI
68.29
Neutral
STOCH
85.03
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWLC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.02, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.02, and equal to the 200-day MA of 32.76, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.52 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 68.29 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 85.03 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RWLC.

RWLC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$84.89M0.32%
73
Outperform
$99.79M0.79%
71
Outperform
$98.52M0.30%
72
Outperform
$94.27M0.92%
62
Neutral
$94.27M0.45%
69
Neutral
$86.80M0.35%
76
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RWLC
Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF
34.52
6.19
21.85%
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
EGGY
NestYield Dynamic Income Shield ETF
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
JOYT
JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement