Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
USNG - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG)
Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as Solaris Energy Infrastructure and Bloom Energy, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, boosting the ETF’s returns.
Energy Sector Focus
The ETF’s heavy exposure to the energy sector aligns with strong industry trends, which can benefit from growing demand for natural gas infrastructure.
Steady Performance
The ETF has shown consistent positive returns over the year, indicating solid management and favorable market conditions.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With nearly 79% of the portfolio in the energy sector, the ETF is highly sensitive to fluctuations in energy markets.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The ETF is overwhelmingly focused on U.S. companies, with minimal exposure to international markets, which limits global diversification.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is higher than some low-cost alternatives, which could eat into long-term returns for investors.
USNG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM4.80M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.59%
Beta0.54
IssuerAmplify
Inception DateMay 20, 2025
Dividend Yield0.71%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,180
30 Day Avg. Volume1,096
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
33.28Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering26
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
USNG Summary
The Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) focuses on companies involved in the U.S. natural gas sector, including exploration, production, transportation, and distribution. It is actively managed to align with market trends and includes well-known companies like Kinder Morgan and Enbridge. This ETF is a good option for investors interested in the energy sector and seeking potential long-term growth as natural gas becomes more important globally. However, new investors should be aware that the ETF is heavily tied to the energy sector, meaning its performance can be impacted by fluctuations in energy prices and demand.
How much will it cost me?The Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, meaning you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, which typically involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) could benefit from increased demand for natural gas as a cleaner energy source and potential government incentives for sustainable energy infrastructure. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating natural gas prices, regulatory changes, or reduced investment in fossil fuel-related industries due to the global push for renewable energy. Its focus on U.S.-based companies and heavy exposure to the energy sector makes it sensitive to domestic energy policies and economic conditions.
USNG Top 10 Holdings
The Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF is heavily concentrated in the energy sector, with names like MPLX and TC Energy providing a steady lift thanks to strong financial performance and strategic growth initiatives. Solaris Energy Infrastructure has been a standout, rising sharply on robust expansions, though its high valuation could be a concern. On the flip side, Kinder Morgan and Energy Transfer are dragging the fund, with bearish trends and mixed earnings sentiment. Overall, the ETF’s focus on U.S.-based natural gas infrastructure offers a targeted play on the energy sector’s evolving dynamics.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Co | 8.66% | $407.25K | $72.96B | 10.21% | 76 Outperform | |
| MPLX | 8.55% | $401.89K | $55.79B | 15.09% | 81 Outperform | |
| Solaris Energy Infrastructure | 8.48% | $398.64K | $3.15B | 64.36% | 69 Neutral | |
| Kinder Morgan | 7.73% | $363.53K | $59.47B | 0.60% | 68 Neutral | |
| Enbridge | 7.65% | $359.72K | $103.63B | 14.81% | 69 Neutral | |
| TC Energy | 4.39% | $206.29K | C$78.33B | 18.90% | 70 Outperform | |
| DT Midstream | 4.38% | $205.70K | $12.30B | 21.83% | 78 Outperform | |
| Vistra Energy | 4.12% | $193.74K | $57.63B | 15.77% | 63 Neutral | |
| Energy Transfer | 3.99% | $187.77K | $56.86B | -11.76% | 70 Outperform | |
| Plains GP Holdings | 3.97% | $186.72K | $14.35B | 1.06% | 72 Outperform |
USNG Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
27.78
Negative
27.20
Positive
Market Momentum
0.07
Positive
43.31
Neutral
12.93
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For USNG, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.84, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.78, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.07 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 43.31 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 12.93 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for USNG.
USNG Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
USNG
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
27.43
3.01
12.33%
LFSC
F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF
―
―
―
CEPI
REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
―
―
―
BESF
Bastion Energy ETF
―
―
―
FPWR
First Trust Eip Power Solutions Etf
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents