FPWR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
First Trust Eip Power Solutions Etf (FPWR)
Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, indicating that its strategy has recently been working well for investors.
Resilient Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, including several major utilities and energy infrastructure companies, have shown steady to strong performance, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Focused Exposure to Power and Energy Infrastructure
The fund’s emphasis on utilities and energy companies gives investors targeted access to businesses tied to power generation and energy transport, which can offer relatively stable cash flows.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges relatively high annual fees, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Sector Concentration Risk
With most assets in utilities and energy, the ETF is heavily exposed to downturns or regulatory changes affecting these specific sectors.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The portfolio is overwhelmingly invested in U.S. companies, providing little protection if the U.S. market or domestic power sector faces broad challenges.
FPWR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM26.25M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.96%
Beta0.28
IssuerFirst Trust
Inception DateAug 19, 2019
Dividend Yield1.8%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume7,583
30 Day Avg. Volume5,597
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
40.84Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering60
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FPWR Summary
FPWR, the First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF, is a sector-focused fund that invests mainly in U.S. utility and energy companies involved in power infrastructure and energy delivery. It follows a power and energy solutions theme rather than a traditional market index, aiming to benefit from ongoing demand for electricity and energy services. Well-known holdings include Duke Energy and Southern Company, which run large electric utilities. Investors might consider FPWR for income and diversification within the energy and utilities space. A key risk is that it is concentrated in one sector, so it can rise or fall sharply with changes in energy and utility markets.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) is 0.96%, which means you’ll pay $9.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a niche sector, requiring more research and specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The ETF's focus on companies advancing clean energy and sustainability could benefit from increasing regulatory support for green initiatives and growing consumer demand for environmentally friendly solutions. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating energy prices, potential changes in government policies, or economic downturns that impact utility and energy sectors, which make up the majority of its holdings.
FPWR Top 10 Holdings
FPWR is largely a U.S. utilities story, with names like American Electric Power and WEC Energy quietly powering the fund as their shares trend higher on solid earnings and big grid investment plans. Midstream energy players such as Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners are also rising, adding some extra fuel to returns despite occasional bumps in growth expectations. On the flip side, Duke Energy, Southern Co, and National Fuel Gas have been more mixed lately, occasionally losing steam and acting as a brake on performance. Overall, it’s a concentrated North American utilities-and-pipelines bet tied to the energy transition.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ― | 5.69% | $1.50M | ― | ― | ― | |
| Duke Energy | 3.39% | $889.63K | $99.04B | 5.32% | 70 Outperform | |
| National Fuel Gas Company | 3.34% | $876.15K | $8.38B | 13.40% | 77 Outperform | |
| PPL | 3.33% | $874.36K | $29.15B | 6.25% | 66 Neutral | |
| Southern Co | 3.14% | $824.61K | $105.39B | 3.33% | 68 Neutral | |
| Energy Transfer | 3.05% | $800.06K | $65.64B | 10.24% | 70 Outperform | |
| Enterprise Products Partners | 3.04% | $798.03K | $82.15B | 21.84% | 73 Outperform | |
| WEC Energy Group | 2.92% | $767.51K | $36.57B | 6.06% | 67 Neutral | |
| American Electric Power | 2.90% | $762.06K | $73.23B | 26.16% | 69 Neutral | |
| IdaCorp | 2.77% | $728.31K | $8.09B | 23.88% | 64 Neutral |
FPWR Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
37.35
Positive
35.58
Positive
34.15
Positive
Market Momentum
0.07
Positive
52.75
Neutral
87.72
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FPWR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.51, equal to the 50-day MA of 37.35, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.15, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.07 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 52.75 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 87.72 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FPWR.
FPWR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FPWR
First Trust Eip Power Solutions Etf
37.49
7.33
24.30%
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
PSR
Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund
―
―
―
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
―
―
―
SEMI
Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF
―
―
―
USNG
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents