tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

FPWR - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FPWR

First Trust Eip Power Solutions Etf (FPWR)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
$37.00
The ETF FPWR has a solid overall rating, reflecting a balanced mix of strong performers and some moderate risks. MPLX stands out as a key contributor, with robust revenue growth, high profitability margins, and bullish momentum supporting the fund’s rating. National Fuel Gas Company also adds strength through efficient operations and strategic growth initiatives, despite minor risks from debt and natural gas price volatility. However, holdings like PPL and Kinder Morgan slightly temper the rating due to valuation concerns and bearish technical trends. The fund’s concentration in energy-related companies may pose risks tied to sector-specific volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the ETF's largest positions, such as National Fuel Gas Company and Evergy, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting overall returns.
Sector Focus on Utilities
The ETF's heavy exposure to the utilities sector provides stability, as this sector tends to perform well during economic uncertainty.
Consistent Positive Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains across year-to-date, one-month, and three-month performance metrics, indicating reliable growth.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high expense ratio compared to many other funds, which can eat into investor returns over time.
Geographic Concentration in the U.S.
With nearly 90% of its holdings in U.S. companies, the ETF lacks diversification across global markets, increasing exposure to domestic risks.
Limited Sector Diversification
The ETF is heavily concentrated in utilities and energy, which may limit its ability to benefit from growth in other sectors like technology or healthcare.

FPWR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FPWR Summary

The First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ticker: ECLN) is designed for investors who want to support environmentally friendly companies while potentially growing their portfolios. This ETF focuses on businesses that are reducing carbon emissions and advancing clean energy solutions, primarily in the utilities and energy sectors. Some of its top holdings include well-known companies like Xcel Energy and American Electric Power. Investing in ECLN could be appealing for those interested in sustainability and diversification. However, new investors should be aware that this ETF is heavily tied to the energy sector, meaning its performance could be impacted by changes in energy regulations or market conditions.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) is 0.96%, which means you’ll pay $9.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a niche sector, requiring more research and specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The ETF's focus on companies advancing clean energy and sustainability could benefit from increasing regulatory support for green initiatives and growing consumer demand for environmentally friendly solutions. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating energy prices, potential changes in government policies, or economic downturns that impact utility and energy sectors, which make up the majority of its holdings.

FPWR Top 10 Holdings

The First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF leans heavily on utilities and energy stocks, with names like Duke Energy and PPL shaping its performance. While Duke Energy is steady, its recent momentum has slowed, holding back gains for the fund. On the brighter side, MPLX and American Electric Power are rising stars, benefiting from bullish trends and strategic growth initiatives. Energy Transfer, however, is dragging the fund with mixed earnings and declining momentum. With a clear focus on U.S.-based companies driving the low-carbon economy, this ETF is a concentrated bet on sustainability and clean energy innovation.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Duke Energy4.46%$828.90K$95.50B7.06%
69
Neutral
3.53%$655.92K
PPL3.32%$617.07K$26.72B4.85%
63
Neutral
National Fuel Gas Company3.28%$609.71K$7.24B24.75%
78
Outperform
Kinder Morgan3.09%$574.70K$60.02B-5.30%
68
Neutral
Evergy3.05%$567.05K$17.46B18.04%
65
Neutral
Enterprise Products Partners3.02%$561.96K$70.18B-1.16%
74
Outperform
MPLX2.98%$553.74K$54.98B9.21%
81
Outperform
Energy Transfer2.93%$544.80K$56.69B-13.42%
69
Neutral
American Electric Power2.85%$529.64K$64.68B23.82%
72
Outperform

FPWR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
33.45
Positive
100DMA
32.90
Positive
200DMA
31.59
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.10
Positive
RSI
52.38
Neutral
STOCH
17.98
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FPWR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.73, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.45, and equal to the 200-day MA of 31.59, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.10 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 52.38 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 17.98 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FPWR.

FPWR Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$18.43M0.96%
67
Neutral
$50.54M0.55%
68
Neutral
$44.57M0.68%
69
Neutral
$35.46M0.32%
68
Neutral
$23.98M0.80%
60
Neutral
$3.79M0.59%
67
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FPWR
First Trust Eip Power Solutions Etf
33.79
3.54
11.70%
PSR
Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
BESF
Bastion Energy ETF
USNG
Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement