SPLV - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV)

Rating:70Outperform

Price Target:―

SPLV, the Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven by high-quality, resilient companies that tend to hold up well in varied market conditions. Strong holdings like Johnson & Johnson, Coca-Cola, TJX, and Waste Management support the fund with robust financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and generally favorable trends, while weaker names such as Evergy and Colgate-Palmolive, which face cash flow, leverage, and technical challenges, modestly weigh on the rating. The main risk is that the fund is built around a specific low-volatility profile, so it may lag more aggressive, high-growth parts of the market during strong bull runs.

Positive Factors

Broad Sector Diversification

The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.

Stable, Defensive Top Holdings

Many of the largest positions are in well-known, defensive companies that have shown generally steady performance so far this year.

Large Asset Base

The fund manages a substantial amount of assets, which can support better liquidity and more efficient trading for investors.

Negative Factors

Heavy Tilt to Utilities and Financials

A large share of the portfolio is concentrated in utilities and financial stocks, which can hurt returns if these sectors fall out of favor.

Mostly U.S.-Only Exposure

With nearly all holdings in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification if the U.S. market faces a downturn.

Moderate Expense Ratio

The fund’s fees are not especially low for a passive ETF, which can slightly reduce long-term returns compared with cheaper alternatives.

SPLV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM8.24B

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.25%

Beta0.36

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateMay 05, 2011

Dividend Yield2%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedS&P 500 Low Volatility

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume4,227,883

30 Day Avg. Volume3,830,614

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

82.23

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering100

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

SPLV Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) follows the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, which picks large U.S. companies from the S&P 500 that have had the smoothest, least bumpy stock prices. It leans toward steadier areas like utilities and consumer staples and holds well-known names such as Johnson & Johnson and Coca-Cola. Someone might invest in SPLV to seek a calmer ride than the overall stock market while still staying invested in big U.S. companies. A key risk is that it can still lose value and will go up and down with the stock market, just usually less sharply.

How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has an expense ratio of 0.25%, meaning you’ll pay $2.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for passively managed ETFs because it follows a specialized strategy of selecting low-volatility stocks, which requires more targeted management.

What would affect this ETF?The SPLV ETF, with its focus on low-volatility large-cap stocks and sectors like utilities and consumer staples, could benefit from economic uncertainty or market downturns as investors seek stability. However, rising interest rates or regulatory changes affecting utilities and real estate sectors may negatively impact its performance. Additionally, its heavy U.S. exposure makes it sensitive to domestic economic conditions and policy shifts.

SPLV Top 10 Holdings

SPLV is leaning hard into classic safety plays, with utilities and consumer defensive names quietly steering the ship. Johnson & Johnson, Coca-Cola, and McDonald’s are all rising and acting like steady anchors, helped by solid earnings and resilient demand. Linde and TJX are also climbing, adding a bit of growth flavor without turning up the risk dial too much. On the softer side, some utilities and real estate names like Evergy and Realty Income look more mixed, occasionally losing steam, but the all‑U.S. lineup keeps the fund firmly grounded in domestic blue chips.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
SO	Southern Co	1.33%	$109.50M	$109.12B	6.65%	68 Neutral
CNP	Centerpoint Energy	1.33%	$109.17M	$28.47B	27.29%	63 Neutral
PNW	Pinnacle West Capital	1.31%	$107.48M	$12.39B	11.36%	65 Neutral
DUK	Duke Energy	1.30%	$107.16M	$103.04B	13.50%	70 Outperform
EVRG	Evergy	1.30%	$106.98M	$19.20B	26.69%	62 Neutral
WEC	WEC Energy Group	1.30%	$106.90M	$37.69B	8.36%	67 Neutral
DTE	DTE Energy	1.30%	$106.74M	$31.20B	14.01%	65 Neutral
AEE	Ameren	1.29%	$106.14M	$30.83B	13.11%	72 Outperform
ATO	Atmos Energy	1.29%	$105.70M	$30.61B	24.52%	66 Neutral
CMS	CMS Energy	1.26%	$103.75M	$23.64B	5.58%	67 Neutral

SPLV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

73.79

Positive

100DMA

72.54

Positive

200DMA

72.28

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

0.85

Positive

RSI

57.55

Neutral

STOCH

44.06

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SPLV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 75.95, equal to the 50-day MA of 73.79, and equal to the 200-day MA of 72.28, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.85 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 57.55 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 44.06 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SPLV.

SPLV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
SPLV	―	―	$8.24B	0.25%	70 Outperform
MGC	―	―	$9.40B	0.05%	74 Outperform
QQQI	―	―	$9.08B	0.68%	75 Outperform
PRF	―	―	$9.02B	0.34%	72 Outperform
QYLD	―	―	$8.36B	0.60%	75 Outperform
RWL	―	―	$8.32B	0.39%	71 Outperform

Performance Comparison

SPLV

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF

76.07

3.45

4.75%

MGC

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF

―

QQQI

NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF

―

PRF

Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF

―

QYLD

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

―

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents