tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RWL - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
RWL, the Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF, earns a solid overall rating, suggesting it offers generally strong quality with some areas to watch. High-quality leaders like Walmart, Apple, Amazon, and Costco support the fund’s standing through strong financial performance, growth initiatives, and solid business models. However, weaker technical trends and leverage or valuation concerns in holdings like CVS, McKesson, and Cencora, along with some bearish signals in other names, introduce risk, and investors should note the fund’s meaningful exposure to large healthcare and consumer-focused companies.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Revenue-Weighted Blue-Chip Holdings
Many of the top positions are large, well-known companies with generally strong or stable recent performance, which can support the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its assets across many sectors, with meaningful exposure to health care, financials, consumer stocks, technology, and others, helping reduce reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
Higher-Than-Index Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is higher than many low-cost S&P 500 index ETFs, which can slightly reduce net returns over time.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers very limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While several leading positions have performed well, some large holdings like Apple and Berkshire Hathaway have recently lagged, which can drag on overall results.

RWL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RWL Summary

RWL is the Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF, which follows the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index. Instead of focusing on the biggest companies by stock size, it gives more weight to companies that bring in higher sales. It holds many well-known U.S. names like Walmart and Amazon, and spreads investments across sectors such as health care, financials, and technology. Someone might invest in RWL to get broad U.S. large-company exposure with a twist that emphasizes strong revenue producers. A key risk is that it can still rise and fall with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because it uses a unique revenue-weighted strategy rather than traditional market-cap weighting, which requires more specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) could benefit from strong consumer spending and technological advancements, as its top holdings include companies like Walmart, Amazon, and Apple, which are leaders in their sectors. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact sectors like Financials and Consumer Cyclical, which make up significant portions of the ETF's exposure. Additionally, regulatory changes in healthcare or technology could pose risks to major holdings such as UnitedHealth and Microsoft.

RWL Top 10 Holdings

RWL leans heavily on U.S. health care, retail, and energy giants, and lately the consumer names are doing the heavy lifting. Walmart and Costco are both rising, giving the fund a steady retail backbone, while Amazon’s more mixed, adding some growth flair without fully pulling its weight. In health care, UnitedHealth and Cencora are generally supportive but a bit choppy, and CVS looks more like a passenger than a driver. Exxon Mobil has been powering ahead, so despite Apple and Berkshire losing steam, the fund still rides a broadly diversified, U.S.-centric engine.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Amazon3.86%$294.49M$2.62T2.50%
71
Outperform
Walmart3.86%$294.20M$932.03B19.56%
78
Outperform
McKesson2.10%$159.89M$102.96B37.04%
62
Neutral
UnitedHealth2.07%$158.29M$256.08B-45.36%
72
Outperform
Apple2.04%$155.51M$3.80T7.14%
79
Outperform
Exxon Mobil1.99%$151.90M$577.03B26.60%
74
Outperform
CVS Health1.97%$150.04M$91.40B30.10%
64
Neutral
Berkshire Hathaway B1.91%$145.97M$1.02T1.15%
66
Neutral
Cencora1.76%$134.28M$69.28B36.96%
70
Neutral
Costco1.61%$122.85M$430.68B-0.34%
72
Outperform

RWL Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
114.97
Positive
100DMA
112.66
Positive
200DMA
107.05
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.82
Positive
RSI
53.60
Neutral
STOCH
54.18
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 117.31, equal to the 50-day MA of 114.97, and equal to the 200-day MA of 107.05, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.82 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 53.60 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 54.18 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RWL.

RWL Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$7.72B0.39%
$9.88B0.07%
$8.84B0.34%
$8.33B0.61%
$8.31B0.68%
$8.22B0.52%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
117.31
15.45
15.17%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
PRF
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement