tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RWL - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past few months, indicating positive recent momentum.
Balanced Sector Mix
Holdings are spread across health care, financials, technology, consumer, industrial, and energy companies, which helps reduce reliance on any single sector.
Large Asset Base
The fund manages a substantial amount of money, which can support liquidity and trading efficiency for investors.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very little geographic diversification.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While some major positions like Amazon, Walmart, and Exxon Mobil have been strong, others such as Apple, CVS Health, Berkshire Hathaway, Microsoft, and JPMorgan have recently lagged.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is higher than many low-cost index ETFs, which can slightly reduce long-term returns.

RWL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RWL Summary

RWL is the Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF, which follows the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index. Instead of giving more weight to the biggest companies by stock size, it tilts toward companies that bring in the most sales. It holds many well-known U.S. names like Amazon and Walmart, and spreads your money across many sectors such as health care, finance, and technology. Someone might invest in RWL for broad diversification in large U.S. companies with a focus on strong revenue. A key risk is that its value can go up or down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because it uses a unique revenue-weighted strategy rather than traditional market-cap weighting, which requires more specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) could benefit from strong consumer spending and technological advancements, as its top holdings include companies like Walmart, Amazon, and Apple, which are leaders in their sectors. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact sectors like Financials and Consumer Cyclical, which make up significant portions of the ETF's exposure. Additionally, regulatory changes in healthcare or technology could pose risks to major holdings such as UnitedHealth and Microsoft.

RWL Top 10 Holdings

RWL leans heavily into U.S. health care and retail powerhouses, and that’s where much of the action is. Centene and UnitedHealth are sprinting ahead, giving the fund a healthy pulse, while CVS adds another dose of strength despite some underlying challenges. On the consumer side, Amazon is steadily rising and helping offset a cooling Walmart, which has been losing a bit of steam lately. Big Tech is present but not dominant: Apple is climbing nicely, while a more mixed Microsoft keeps the fund from fully riding the tech wave.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Amazon4.16%$376.03M$2.73T15.20%
71
Outperform
Walmart3.33%$301.21M$936.98B21.96%
78
Outperform
UnitedHealth2.92%$263.96M$360.05B31.74%
72
Outperform
Apple2.56%$231.25M$4.57T50.72%
79
Outperform
CVS Health2.40%$216.52M$120.98B50.88%
64
Neutral
Berkshire Hathaway B1.77%$159.63M$1.03T-1.09%
66
Neutral
Exxon Mobil1.61%$145.23M$630.20B43.78%
74
Outperform
Dell Technologies1.60%$145.00M$275.36B246.72%
65
Neutral
Centene1.60%$144.34M$30.96B13.00%
58
Neutral
Microsoft1.59%$143.87M$3.18T-11.42%
79
Outperform

RWL Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
122.22
Positive
100DMA
120.12
Positive
200DMA
115.58
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.41
Positive
RSI
61.64
Neutral
STOCH
70.02
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 125.91, equal to the 50-day MA of 122.22, and equal to the 200-day MA of 115.58, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.41 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 61.64 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 70.02 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RWL.

RWL Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$9.19B0.39%
71
Outperform
$9.61B0.34%
72
Outperform
$8.37B0.60%
79
Outperform
$8.17B0.12%
73
Outperform
$8.11B0.06%
73
Outperform
$7.70B0.18%
74
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
127.03
26.80
26.74%
PRF
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement