tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSPU - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPU

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
The overall rating of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) suggests it is a solid investment option with balanced strengths and risks. Holdings like NextEra Energy (NEE) and Sempra Energy (SRE) contribute positively to the fund’s rating due to their strong financial performance and strategic investments in renewable energy and infrastructure, despite concerns like high leverage. However, weaker holdings such as AES, which faces financial challenges like negative cash flow, may slightly weigh down the ETF's overall score. A key risk factor is the fund's concentration in the utilities sector, which may limit diversification and expose it to sector-specific challenges.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, indicating strong overall momentum.
Equal Weighting Strategy
The fund's equal weighting approach reduces reliance on any single company, promoting balanced exposure.
Low Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a reasonable expense ratio, making it cost-effective compared to many actively managed funds.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration Risk
The ETF is heavily focused on utilities, which could limit performance if the sector faces challenges.
Limited Geographic Diversification
With nearly all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund lacks exposure to international markets.
Underperforming Holding
One of the top holdings, PG&E, has shown negative performance year-to-date, dragging on overall returns.

RSPU Historical Chart

RSPU Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) is a fund that focuses on the utilities sector, which includes companies providing essential services like electricity and water. Unlike traditional funds that give more weight to larger companies, RSPU gives equal weight to all its holdings, offering a balanced and diversified approach. Some of its top holdings include well-known companies like NextEra Energy and Constellation Energy Corporation. Investors might consider RSPU for its potential to provide steady growth and reliable dividend income, as utilities are known for their consistent demand. However, a key risk is that the ETF is heavily focused on utilities, so its performance may be affected by changes in energy regulations or economic conditions impacting this sector.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average because the fund uses an equal-weighted approach, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track market-cap-weighted indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPU ETF, focused on the U.S. utilities sector, could benefit from stable demand for essential services and potential growth in renewable energy investments by top holdings like NextEra Energy and Constellation Energy. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for utilities companies, and regulatory changes that could impact profitability. Its equal-weighted approach helps reduce concentration risk, but broader economic slowdowns could still negatively affect the sector.

RSPU Top 10 Holdings

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) is heavily concentrated in the U.S. utilities sector, offering a defensive play with steady dividend potential. Constellation Energy is rising, buoyed by strong earnings and a focus on nuclear energy, while American Electric Power is steady, supported by strategic growth plans. However, NextEra Energy is losing steam due to valuation concerns, and PG&E is lagging amid regulatory risks. With a balanced approach across names, the fund captures the sector’s resilience but faces mixed performance from key holdings.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
PPL3.37%$16.82M$25.95B7.87%
66
Neutral
PG&E3.34%$16.67M$34.66B-21.70%
69
Neutral
Consolidated Edison3.33%$16.59M$35.84B10.88%
62
Neutral
Southern Co3.31%$16.53M$95.98B4.85%
68
Neutral
Edison International3.31%$16.50M$22.90B-25.42%
77
Outperform
Duke Energy3.28%$16.39M$91.13B8.16%
70
Outperform
Centerpoint Energy3.26%$16.29M$25.00B18.88%
63
Neutral
Public Service Enterprise3.26%$16.29M$40.13B-5.34%
66
Neutral
Pinnacle West Capital3.26%$16.28M$10.58B4.06%
65
Neutral
Ameren3.26%$16.28M$27.00B10.75%
72
Outperform

RSPU Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
76.52
Negative
100DMA
75.65
Negative
200DMA
72.50
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.55
Negative
RSI
45.59
Neutral
STOCH
59.74
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPU, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 74.91, equal to the 50-day MA of 76.52, and equal to the 200-day MA of 72.50, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.55 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 45.59 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 59.74 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPU.

RSPU Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$500.00M0.40%
$964.48M0.18%
$952.72M0.62%
$863.99M0.40%
$830.52M0.61%
$779.24M0.48%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
74.80
10.80
16.87%
IETC
iShares Evolved US Technology ETF
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
REZ
iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement