tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSPS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPS

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a balanced overall rating, reflecting both strengths and challenges among its holdings. Strong contributors like Monster Beverage and Coca-Cola drive the fund's performance with robust financial results and positive earnings sentiment, showcasing growth potential and stability. However, weaker holdings such as Estée Lauder and Dollar Tree, which face challenges like declining revenues and profitability issues, slightly weigh down the overall rating. The fund's exposure to the consumer staples sector provides stability but may limit diversification across other industries.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as Monster Beverage and Estée Lauder, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF’s returns.
Stable Sector Focus
The fund’s focus on the Consumer Defensive sector provides stability during economic uncertainty, as these companies tend to perform well regardless of market conditions.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is relatively low compared to actively managed funds, making it cost-effective for investors.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration Risk
The ETF is entirely focused on the Consumer Defensive sector, which limits diversification and increases vulnerability to sector-specific challenges.
Underperforming Holdings
Some holdings, such as Brown-Forman and Lamb Weston, have lagged in year-to-date performance, dragging down overall returns.
Limited Geographic Exposure
The ETF is fully invested in U.S. companies, offering no exposure to international markets, which could limit growth opportunities.

RSPS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPS Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is a fund that invests in companies within the consumer staples sector, which includes essential goods like food, beverages, and household products. It follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples Index, meaning every company in the fund is equally represented, giving smaller firms the same importance as larger ones. Well-known companies in the ETF include Walmart and PepsiCo. Investors might consider RSPS for its focus on stable, everyday products that tend to perform well even during economic downturns. However, a risk to keep in mind is that the ETF’s performance is tied to the consumer staples sector, which may lag during periods of strong economic growth.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight methodology, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds that track market-cap-weighted indices.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPS ETF, focused on U.S. consumer staples, could benefit from stable demand for essential goods like food, beverages, and household products, especially during economic downturns when these items remain necessities. However, rising interest rates or inflation could negatively impact consumer spending power and the profitability of companies in this sector, while regulatory changes or supply chain disruptions could also pose risks.

RSPS Top 10 Holdings

The RSPS ETF is firmly rooted in the consumer staples sector, showcasing a mix of steady performers and a few laggards. Monster Beverage is rising, fueled by strong financials and growth momentum, while Coca-Cola adds stability with its consistent performance. On the flip side, Lamb Weston and Brown-Forman are dragging the fund, with bearish trends and revenue challenges weighing them down. The fund’s equal-weight approach ensures no single company dominates, but its U.S.-centric focus and defensive sector tilt make it a reliable choice for cautious investors seeking resilience in uncertain markets.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Monster Beverage3.26%$7.70M$73.32B36.09%
80
Outperform
Bunge Global3.20%$7.55M$18.66B8.51%
74
Outperform
Dollar Tree3.03%$7.16M$22.39B53.50%
59
Neutral
Walmart2.97%$7.00M$869.84B18.74%
78
Outperform
Coca-Cola2.94%$6.93M$313.50B13.12%
78
Outperform
The Estée Lauder Companies2.93%$6.91M$33.77B26.69%
46
Neutral
Lamb Weston Holdings2.92%$6.88M$8.31B-22.29%
60
Neutral
Kellanova2.89%$6.82M$29.09B3.02%
64
Neutral
Brown-Forman B2.87%$6.77M$13.49B-31.32%
74
Outperform
Tyson Foods2.86%$6.74M$20.04B-10.15%
62
Neutral

RSPS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
29.10
Positive
100DMA
29.69
Negative
200DMA
29.74
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
>-0.01
Negative
RSI
59.59
Neutral
STOCH
78.01
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.76, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.10, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.74, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of >-0.01 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 59.59 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 78.01 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPS.

RSPS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$233.64M0.40%
$956.25M0.62%
$931.55M0.18%
$805.11M0.48%
$756.29M0.40%
$264.77M0.63%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPS
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF
29.54
-1.44
-4.65%
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
IETC
iShares Evolved US Technology ETF
REZ
iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement