RSPS - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS)

Rating:66Neutral

Price Target:―

RSPS, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF, earns a solid overall rating, mainly supported by strong, stable consumer names like Hershey, Church & Dwight, Sysco, and Costco, which show healthy financial performance and generally positive growth prospects. However, holdings such as Kroger, with profitability and leverage challenges, and tobacco names like Altria and Philip Morris, which face leverage issues and industry headwinds, weigh on the fund’s appeal. The main risk factor is its concentration in consumer staples, including exposure to challenged sub-sectors like traditional tobacco, which could limit upside if these areas underperform.

Positive Factors

Broad Mix of Consumer Staples Leaders

The fund holds a wide range of well-known consumer staples companies, which can provide steadier performance through different market conditions.

Equal-Weight Approach

Because each stock has a similar weight, the ETF avoids relying too heavily on just a few mega-cap names and spreads company-specific risk more evenly.

Generally Strong Recent Performance

Most of the top holdings have shown solid gains so far this year, supporting the fund’s positive recent returns.

Negative Factors

Single-Sector Concentration

The ETF is fully invested in consumer defensive stocks, so it may lag the broader market when other sectors are leading.

U.S.-Only Exposure

All holdings are based in the United States, offering no geographic diversification if U.S. markets or the U.S. consumer sector weaken.

Moderately High Expense Ratio

The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for a passive ETF, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

RSPS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM264.38M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.40%

Beta0.22

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateNov 01, 2006

Dividend Yield2.67%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume96,044

30 Day Avg. Volume128,009

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

34.41

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering37

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

RSPS Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples Index, focusing on companies that sell everyday essentials like food, drinks, and household products. Instead of letting the biggest companies dominate, it gives each stock a similar weight. Well-known holdings include Costco and Target. Someone might invest in RSPS for more stable, defensive exposure, since people tend to buy these products in good and bad economies. However, it is concentrated in one sector, so it can still go up and down with changes in the consumer staples market.

How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight methodology, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds that track market-cap-weighted indices.

What would affect this ETF?The RSPS ETF, focused on U.S. consumer staples, could benefit from stable demand for essential goods like food, beverages, and household products, especially during economic downturns when these items remain necessities. However, rising interest rates or inflation could negatively impact consumer spending power and the profitability of companies in this sector, while regulatory changes or supply chain disruptions could also pose risks.

RSPS Top 10 Holdings

This ETF is a pure U.S. consumer-staples play, and its story is about steady, defensive names quietly doing the heavy lifting. Food and agriculture giant Bunge and distributor Sysco have been rising, helping power the fund as demand for everyday essentials stays firm. Household brands like Church & Dwight and Colgate-Palmolive are also contributing, though their momentum looks more steady than spectacular. On the flip side, Clorox and Philip Morris show more mixed signals, occasionally losing steam and keeping overall gains from looking too flashy despite the sector’s resilience.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
BG	Bunge Global	3.70%	$9.77M	$24.14B	68.83%	66 Neutral
ADM	Archer Daniels Midland	3.35%	$8.85M	$34.64B	52.56%	64 Neutral
KR	Kroger Company	3.30%	$8.70M	$47.84B	16.13%	56 Neutral
TGT	Target	3.29%	$8.69M	$53.14B	12.07%	70 Neutral
HSY	The Hershey Company	3.22%	$8.50M	$44.00B	27.53%	76 Outperform
CHD	Church & Dwight	3.20%	$8.46M	$23.14B	-10.40%	72 Outperform
SYY	Sysco	3.11%	$8.20M	$40.94B	16.68%	71 Outperform
MO	Altria Group	3.11%	$8.20M	$113.51B	15.24%	64 Neutral
PM	Philip Morris	3.09%	$8.16M	$271.89B	15.00%	61 Neutral
COST	Costco	3.08%	$8.14M	$447.39B	11.56%	72 Outperform

RSPS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Negative

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

31.39

Negative

100DMA

30.20

Positive

200DMA

29.96

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

-0.32

Positive

RSI

34.93

Neutral

STOCH

8.36

Positive

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 31.95, equal to the 50-day MA of 31.39, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.96, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.32 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 34.93 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 8.36 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPS.

RSPS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RSPS	―	―	$264.38M	0.40%	66 Neutral
RSPN	―	―	$862.50M	0.40%	72 Outperform
FXH	―	―	$854.72M	0.61%	71 Outperform
FXU	―	―	$852.50M	0.61%	68 Neutral
REZ	―	―	$824.62M	0.48%	70 Outperform
FXG	―	―	$238.51M	0.63%	68 Neutral

Performance Comparison

RSPS

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF

30.59

1.21

4.12%

RSPN

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF

―

FXH

First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund

―

FXU

First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund

―

REZ

iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF

―

FXG

First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents