tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSPS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPS

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a solid overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong performers and some weaker holdings. Key contributors like Monster Beverage (MNST) and Walmart (WMT) stand out for their robust financial performance and strategic growth initiatives, which enhance the fund's overall quality. However, holdings such as Estee Lauder (EL), with concerns around profitability and valuation, slightly weigh on the ETF's rating. A potential risk is the fund's concentration in the consumer staples sector, which could limit diversification and expose it to sector-specific challenges.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as Monster Beverage and Estée Lauder, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF’s returns.
Stable Sector Focus
The fund’s focus on the Consumer Defensive sector provides stability during economic uncertainty, as these companies tend to perform well regardless of market conditions.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is relatively low compared to actively managed funds, making it cost-effective for investors.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration Risk
The ETF is entirely focused on the Consumer Defensive sector, which limits diversification and increases vulnerability to sector-specific challenges.
Underperforming Holdings
Some holdings, such as Brown-Forman and Lamb Weston, have lagged in year-to-date performance, dragging down overall returns.
Limited Geographic Exposure
The ETF is fully invested in U.S. companies, offering no exposure to international markets, which could limit growth opportunities.

RSPS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPS Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is a fund that invests in companies within the consumer staples sector, which includes essential goods like food, beverages, and household products. It follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples Index, meaning every company in the fund is equally represented, giving smaller firms the same importance as larger ones. Well-known companies in the ETF include Walmart and PepsiCo. Investors might consider RSPS for its focus on stable, everyday products that tend to perform well even during economic downturns. However, a risk to keep in mind is that the ETF’s performance is tied to the consumer staples sector, which may lag during periods of strong economic growth.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight methodology, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds that track market-cap-weighted indices.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPS ETF, focused on U.S. consumer staples, could benefit from stable demand for essential goods like food, beverages, and household products, especially during economic downturns when these items remain necessities. However, rising interest rates or inflation could negatively impact consumer spending power and the profitability of companies in this sector, while regulatory changes or supply chain disruptions could also pose risks.

RSPS Top 10 Holdings

The RSPS ETF is firmly rooted in the consumer staples sector, with names like Walmart and Dollar General providing steady support thanks to their strong financial performance and strategic growth initiatives. Monster Beverage adds a touch of bullish momentum, driven by its robust earnings and growth outlook. However, Target and Brown-Forman are holding the fund back, with mixed signals and revenue challenges weighing on their performance. The fund’s equal-weight approach ensures smaller players like Tyson Foods and Bunge Global contribute, but overall, the ETF leans heavily on U.S.-based consumer defensive stocks for stability.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Dollar Tree3.65%$8.55M$25.42B66.13%
61
Neutral
Dollar General3.64%$8.53M$30.22B84.29%
73
Outperform
The Estée Lauder Companies3.49%$8.17M$38.92B45.35%
56
Neutral
Monster Beverage3.43%$8.03M$74.51B49.75%
80
Outperform
Walmart3.21%$7.53M$911.47B24.63%
78
Outperform
Bunge Global3.13%$7.35M$17.69B13.59%
66
Neutral
Target3.05%$7.14M$44.38B-27.84%
70
Neutral
Tyson Foods2.98%$6.98M$20.23B1.40%
69
Neutral
Brown-Forman B2.95%$6.91M$13.16B-30.03%
74
Outperform
PepsiCo2.93%$6.87M$202.59B-2.80%
78
Outperform

RSPS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
29.04
Positive
100DMA
29.37
Negative
200DMA
29.51
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
0.17
Positive
RSI
48.89
Neutral
STOCH
21.36
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.38, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.04, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.51, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.17 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.89 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 21.36 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPS.

RSPS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$237.46M0.40%
$932.82M0.62%
$914.32M0.18%
$875.79M0.40%
$819.47M0.61%
$259.30M0.63%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPS
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF
29.23
-0.22
-0.75%
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
IETC
iShares Evolved US Technology ETF
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement