RSPF - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF)

Rating:73Outperform

Price Target:―

RSPF, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven by strong, profitable financial companies like Chubb, Travelers, and Arch Capital Group, which all show healthy earnings, positive outlooks, and in some cases attractive valuations. These strengths are slightly tempered by names such as Interactive Brokers and Arch Capital Group that face bearish or mixed technical signals and, in Arch’s case, no dividend, as well as broader risks from the fund’s concentrated exposure to the financial sector.

Positive Factors

Broad Financials Exposure

The fund holds many different financial companies, which helps spread risk across the sector instead of relying on just a few big names.

Several Strong Top Holdings

Many of the largest positions, such as Interactive Brokers, Invesco, and Cboe Global Markets, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF’s overall results.

Moderate Fund Size

With a few hundred million dollars in assets, the ETF is large enough to be established but not so big that it struggles to adjust its holdings.

Negative Factors

Single-Sector Concentration

The ETF is heavily focused on financial stocks, so its performance is very sensitive to conditions in the financial sector.

Limited Geographic Diversification

Almost all of the fund’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering little protection if the U.S. market weakens compared with other regions.

Above-Average Expense Ratio

The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for a passive ETF, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

RSPF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM260.61M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.40%

Beta0.85

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateNov 01, 2006

Dividend Yield1.7%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume18,730

30 Day Avg. Volume14,266

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

88.74

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering77

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

RSPF Summary

RSPF is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF. It follows a version of the S&P 500 index that focuses on U.S. financial companies and gives each stock roughly the same weight, instead of letting the biggest firms dominate. It holds a wide mix of banks, insurance companies, and other financial businesses, including well-known names like PNC Financial and S&P Global. Someone might invest in RSPF to get diversified exposure to the U.S. financial sector with both large and mid-sized players. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to financial stocks, which can rise and fall sharply with interest rates and the economy.

How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it uses an equal-weight methodology, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track market-cap-weighted indexes.

What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) could benefit from a strong U.S. economy, rising interest rates that improve bank profitability, and increased adoption of financial technology, as several top holdings like Robinhood and Coinbase are tied to fintech. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in the financial sector, economic slowdowns, or market volatility that could negatively impact banks and financial services companies. The ETF's focus on U.S. financials means its performance is closely tied to domestic economic conditions and sector-specific trends.

RSPF Top 10 Holdings

RSPF is a pure U.S. financials play, and its story right now is about broad strength rather than a single star. Payment specialist Corpay and exchanges like CME and Cboe are doing much of the heavy lifting, with rising share prices fueled by solid growth narratives. Regional banks such as M&T Bank and Fifth Third are also pulling their weight as sentiment toward traditional lenders improves. Insurance giant Chubb is quietly steady, while Interactive Brokers is more mixed, occasionally losing steam and modestly trimming the fund’s otherwise upbeat tone.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
CME	CME Group	1.70%	$4.43M	$111.68B	20.38%	74 Outperform
CBOE	Cboe Global Markets	1.69%	$4.42M	$30.34B	35.50%	75 Outperform
CB	Chubb	1.61%	$4.21M	$128.35B	11.91%	80 Outperform
TRV	Travelers Companies	1.57%	$4.11M	$65.41B	15.94%	78 Outperform
L	Loews	1.53%	$4.00M	$22.26B	24.99%	76 Outperform
CPAY	Corpay Inc	1.50%	$3.91M	$21.61B	-6.02%	75 Outperform
HIG	Hartford Insurance	1.50%	$3.91M	$36.67B	11.81%	78 Outperform
GL	Globe Life	1.49%	$3.90M	$10.89B	10.40%	68 Neutral
ACGL	Arch Capital Group	1.49%	$3.89M	$33.26B	0.97%	79 Outperform
AFL	AFLAC	1.48%	$3.87M	$56.13B	1.36%	68 Neutral

RSPF Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Negative

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

76.69

Negative

100DMA

76.42

Negative

200DMA

76.09

Negative

Market Momentum

MACD

-1.37

Positive

RSI

30.09

Neutral

STOCH

3.43

Positive

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPF, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 74.29, equal to the 50-day MA of 76.69, and equal to the 200-day MA of 76.09, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -1.37 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 30.09 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 3.43 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPF.

RSPF Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RSPF	―	―	$260.61M	0.40%	73 Outperform
IAT	―	―	$563.21M	0.38%	74 Outperform
REM	―	―	$558.36M	0.48%	62 Neutral
KCE	―	―	$434.52M	0.35%	70 Outperform
KBWD	―	―	$422.74M	5.39%	64 Neutral
MORT	―	―	$396.92M	0.42%	62 Neutral

Performance Comparison

RSPF

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

71.37

0.75

1.06%

IAT

iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF

―

REM

iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF

―

KCE

SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF

―

KBWD

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF

―

MORT

VanEck Mortgage REIT Income ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents