tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RSPF - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPF

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
RSPF, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF, has an overall rating that suggests it is a solid but not flawless option within the financials sector. Strong holdings like Travelers Companies and Bank of New York Mellon, both supported by healthy financial performance and positive earnings outlooks, help lift the fund’s quality. However, positions such as Ameriprise Financial and Coinbase, where bearish technical trends, weaker margins, or cash flow concerns appear, introduce added risk, and the fund’s focus on financial companies means it is sensitive to sector-specific downturns.
Positive Factors
Broad Financial Sector Exposure
The fund holds many different financial companies, which helps spread risk across the sector instead of relying on just a few names.
Equal-Weight Approach
Because the ETF weights its holdings more evenly, smaller and mid-sized financial stocks have a better chance to contribute to returns instead of the fund being dominated by a few giants.
Recent Performance Momentum
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past few months, suggesting recent strength in its financial sector holdings.
Negative Factors
Heavy Concentration in Financials
With the vast majority of assets in financial stocks, the fund is highly sensitive to downturns in the financial sector.
Limited Geographic Diversification
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, so it offers little protection if the U.S. market weakens while other regions do better.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including some well-known names, have shown weak or negative performance this year, which could drag on overall returns if the trend continues.

RSPF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPF Summary

RSPF is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF, which follows an index of U.S. financial companies in the S&P 500 and gives each one roughly the same weight. It holds a mix of banks, insurance firms, payment companies, and other financial businesses, including well-known names like PayPal and Capital One. Someone might invest in RSPF to get diversified exposure to the financial sector without putting too much money into just a few giant firms. A key risk is that it is heavily focused on financial stocks, so its value can rise or fall sharply with changes in interest rates and the overall economy.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it uses an equal-weight methodology, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track market-cap-weighted indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) could benefit from a strong U.S. economy, rising interest rates that improve bank profitability, and increased adoption of financial technology, as several top holdings like Robinhood and Coinbase are tied to fintech. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in the financial sector, economic slowdowns, or market volatility that could negatively impact banks and financial services companies. The ETF's focus on U.S. financials means its performance is closely tied to domestic economic conditions and sector-specific trends.

RSPF Top 10 Holdings

RSPF is a pure play on U.S. financials, and its story right now is being written by a mix of traditional insurers and payment players. Travelers, Allstate, Ameriprise, and State Street have been steadily rising, giving the fund a solid backbone of insurance and asset-management strength. On the flip side, Jack Henry looks like it’s losing steam this year, and PayPal’s rebound has been choppy, keeping a lid on gains from the fintech side. With an equal-weight approach, no single giant dominates, but the fund is clearly anchored in U.S. financials with a dash of payments and tech-driven finance.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
PayPal Holdings1.69%$5.21M$48.94B-14.75%
76
Outperform
Global Payments1.66%$5.12M$23.00B7.74%
70
Outperform
Willis Towers Watson1.52%$4.69M$31.20B6.72%
75
Outperform
Block1.48%$4.56M$48.35B9.74%
72
Outperform
Travelers Companies1.48%$4.56M$78.08B44.92%
78
Outperform
Jack Henry & Associates1.45%$4.45M$10.94B-7.91%
77
Outperform
Ameriprise Financial1.45%$4.45M$49.07B8.84%
64
Neutral
Allstate1.42%$4.37M$67.98B32.19%
74
Outperform
Capital One Financial1.42%$4.35M$128.22B0.74%
71
Outperform
Fidelity National Info1.41%$4.34M$23.14B-42.87%
64
Neutral

RSPF Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
78.85
Positive
100DMA
76.11
Positive
200DMA
75.99
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
RSI
STOCH
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPF, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 82.39, equal to the 50-day MA of 78.85, and equal to the 200-day MA of 75.99, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPF.

RSPF Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$306.03M0.40%
73
Outperform
$673.27M0.38%
74
Outperform
$650.99M0.35%
71
Outperform
$539.03M0.38%
75
Outperform
$538.06M0.48%
62
Neutral
$408.36M5.39%
64
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
83.35
8.59
11.49%
IAT
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF
KIE
SPDR S&P Insurance ETF
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement