RSPF - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF)
Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Performers Among Top Holdings
Several major positions like Northern, State Street, Citigroup, and Bank of New York Mellon have shown strong year-to-date gains, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Equal-Weight Approach Reduces Single-Stock Risk
The ETF spreads its holdings fairly evenly across many financial companies, so no single stock dominates the portfolio.
Clear Focus on U.S. Financial Sector
With almost all assets in U.S. financial stocks, the fund offers targeted exposure for investors who want to bet specifically on this part of the market.
Negative Factors
Mixed Performance So Far This Year
The ETF’s year-to-date return has been weak overall, despite a recent strong one-month rebound.
Several Top Holdings Are Lagging
Notable positions such as Apollo, KKR, Blackstone, Synchrony Financial, and FactSet have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on the fund.
High Sector and U.S. Concentration
The portfolio is heavily concentrated in U.S. financial stocks with very little exposure to other sectors or regions, increasing vulnerability to downturns in that area of the market.
RSPF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM280.08M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.84
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 01, 2006
Dividend Yield1.62%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume19,647
30 Day Avg. Volume11,843
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
86.16Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering77
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSPF Summary
RSPF is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF, which follows the S&P 500 Equal Weighted Financials index. Instead of putting more money into the biggest companies, it gives roughly the same weight to each financial stock in the index. It holds well-known names like Citigroup and Morgan Stanley, along with many other banks, insurance companies, and financial service firms. Someone might invest in RSPF to get diversified exposure to the U.S. financial sector with a balance between large and smaller players. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to financial stocks, which can rise and fall sharply with interest rates and the economy.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it uses an equal-weight methodology, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track market-cap-weighted indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) could benefit from a strong U.S. economy, rising interest rates that improve bank profitability, and increased adoption of financial technology, as several top holdings like Robinhood and Coinbase are tied to fintech. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in the financial sector, economic slowdowns, or market volatility that could negatively impact banks and financial services companies. The ETF's focus on U.S. financials means its performance is closely tied to domestic economic conditions and sector-specific trends.
RSPF Top 10 Holdings
RSPF is a pure play on U.S. financials, and its equal-weight approach means performance is being steered by a broad mix rather than one giant bank. Recently, exchanges and asset managers like Cboe Global Markets and Franklin Resources have been doing the heavy lifting, with Interactive Brokers and Northern Trust also pulling their weight as trading and custody activity stay healthy. On the flip side, alternative-asset players Apollo Global Management and Ares Management have been more of a speed bump, lagging after earlier strength. Overall, the fund is tightly tied to the fortunes of diversified financials, not tech or other sectors.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Stanley | 1.63% | $4.56M | $335.43B | 65.29% | 76 Outperform | |
| State Street | 1.61% | $4.51M | $45.63B | 74.36% | 75 Outperform | |
| Interactive Brokers | 1.60% | $4.48M | $39.57B | 79.68% | 75 Outperform | |
| Ares Management | 1.58% | $4.42M | $43.81B | -19.01% | 70 Outperform | |
| Franklin Resources | 1.57% | $4.39M | $16.53B | 44.92% | 74 Outperform | |
| Citigroup | 1.56% | $4.36M | $236.78B | 83.12% | 68 Neutral | |
| Apollo Global Management | 1.55% | $4.35M | $77.20B | 1.34% | 75 Outperform | |
| Goldman Sachs Group | 1.55% | $4.33M | $305.52B | 73.22% | 73 Outperform | |
| Metlife | 1.54% | $4.31M | $56.35B | 14.85% | 71 Outperform | |
| Principal Financial | 1.53% | $4.29M | $23.69B | 46.40% | 76 Outperform |
RSPF Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
75.42
Positive
74.71
Positive
75.61
Positive
Market Momentum
0.52
Negative
65.23
Neutral
89.77
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPF, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 75.79, equal to the 50-day MA of 75.42, and equal to the 200-day MA of 75.61, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.52 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 65.23 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 89.77 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPF.
RSPF Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
77.77
6.04
8.42%
IAT
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF
―
―
―
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
KIE
SPDR S&P Insurance ETF
―
―
―
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
―
―
―
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents