tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

PGJ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PGJ

Invesco Golden Dragon China Etf (PGJ)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
PGJ, the Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects a mix of strong Chinese consumer and tech names alongside some more challenged holdings. Standout positions like NetEase, Vipshop, and Yum China support the fund’s quality through robust financial performance, fair or attractive valuations, and generally positive business momentum. However, holdings such as KE Holdings, Baidu, and Alibaba face valuation concerns, bearish technical trends, or profitability pressures, and the ETF’s focus on China-related companies means investors are exposed to concentrated regional and regulatory risk.
Positive Factors
Leading Chinese Internet Holdings
Top positions like Baidu and Alibaba have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Targeted Exposure to Chinese Consumer and Online Growth
Heavy weights in consumer cyclical and communication services give investors focused access to China’s growing online shopping, travel, and entertainment markets.
Clear Thematic Focus
The fund’s concentrated exposure to U.S.-listed Chinese companies makes it a straightforward way to express a view on this specific segment of the market.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high annual fee reduces the net return that investors keep compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Recent Weak Short-Term Performance
Returns over the past one and three months have been weak, suggesting recent pressure on the underlying holdings.
Concentrated and Narrow Exposure
A large share of assets is tied to a handful of consumer and internet names from a single country theme, increasing risk if sentiment toward Chinese equities turns negative.

PGJ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PGJ Summary

The Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) tracks the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index, which focuses on U.S.-listed companies that make most of their money in China. It holds a mix of consumer, internet, and tech businesses, including well-known names like Alibaba and Baidu. Someone might invest in PGJ to seek growth from China’s long-term economic and technology development while adding international diversification to a U.S.-heavy portfolio. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to Chinese companies, so it can be very volatile and can go up or down sharply with changes in China’s economy, regulations, or politics.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) has an expense ratio of 0.7%, which means you’ll pay $7 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on a niche market with specialized exposure to U.S.-listed companies tied to China. Active management typically involves higher costs due to research and strategy implementation.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) could benefit from China's economic growth and innovation, particularly in sectors like consumer cyclical, communication services, and technology, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, potential risks include regulatory changes in China, geopolitical tensions, and global economic slowdowns, which could negatively impact the performance of its top holdings like Alibaba and Baidu. Additionally, fluctuations in interest rates or currency values may influence investor sentiment toward international investments.

PGJ Top 10 Holdings

PGJ is leaning heavily on Chinese consumer and internet names, with Baidu and Alibaba doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares have been rising on optimism around AI and a gradual recovery in online spending. H World Group has also been a bright spot, reflecting improving travel and hotel demand. On the flip side, JD and a cluster of platform plays like Tencent Music and Kanzhun have been lagging, acting as a bit of an anchor on returns. The fund is effectively a China-focused, U.S.-listed growth bet, concentrated in consumer and communication services rather than tech hardware.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Baidu9.83%$13.46M$53.82B69.07%
64
Neutral
Alibaba8.64%$11.84M$364.57B71.55%
68
Neutral
Yum China Holdings8.23%$11.27M$17.86B6.85%
78
Outperform
JD7.15%$9.80M$41.80B-30.06%
70
Outperform
NetEase5.60%$7.67M$80.61B25.26%
81
Outperform
Tencent Music Entertainment Group3.65%$4.99M$23.63B40.07%
71
Outperform
H World Group3.59%$4.91M$14.67B47.82%
74
Outperform
Full Truck Alliance3.49%$4.78M$10.35B-12.08%
66
Neutral
Vipshop3.49%$4.78M$8.44B19.07%
81
Outperform
KE Holdings Inc. Sponsored ADR Class A3.45%$4.72M$22.27B7.40%
62
Neutral

PGJ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
29.61
Negative
100DMA
30.81
Negative
200DMA
29.43
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.09
Negative
RSI
47.13
Neutral
STOCH
60.70
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PGJ, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.95, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.61, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.43, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.09 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 47.13 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 60.70 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for PGJ.

PGJ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$140.11M0.70%
$8.13B0.59%
$6.80B0.74%
$97.28M0.59%
$80.72M0.80%
$2.04M0.89%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China Etf
29.61
3.33
12.67%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement