MCHI - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI)
Rating:57Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Large, Established Fund
The ETF manages a sizable pool of assets, suggesting it is widely used and offers good trading liquidity for investors.
Broad Sector Exposure Within China
Holdings spread across consumer, communication services, financials, technology, and other sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Support from Strong Chinese Banks
Several major Chinese banks in the top holdings have shown strong recent performance, helping to offset weakness in some technology and consumer names.
Negative Factors
High Fee Level
The expense ratio is relatively high for an index ETF, which can steadily eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Concentration in a Few Big Tech Names
A large share of the fund is tied up in a small number of major Chinese technology and internet companies, increasing the impact if these stocks continue to struggle.
Recent Weak Overall Performance
The ETF’s returns over the year to date and recent months have been weak, reflecting ongoing challenges in the Chinese equity market.
MCHI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM6.04B
RegionAsia-Pacific
Expense Ratio0.59%
Beta0.71
IssueriShares
Inception DateMar 29, 2011
Dividend Yield2.02%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMSCI China
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume3,193,120
30 Day Avg. Volume3,070,298
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
72.30Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering164
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
MCHI Summary
The iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) tracks the MSCI China Index, giving you broad exposure to major Chinese stocks in one investment. It holds many types of companies, including online platforms, banks, and consumer brands. Well-known names in the fund include Tencent and Alibaba. Someone might invest in MCHI to tap into China’s long-term growth potential and to diversify a portfolio that is mostly focused on the U.S. market. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the Chinese market, which can be very volatile and affected by government policy changes.
How much will it cost me?The iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, which means you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it tracks a specific international market and requires more active management compared to broad U.S. index funds. It’s still considered reasonable for the exposure it provides to the Chinese equity market.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) could benefit from China's economic recovery and growth in consumer spending, particularly in sectors like consumer cyclical and communication services, which make up a significant portion of the ETF. However, potential risks include regulatory changes in China's technology and financial sectors, as well as global economic uncertainties or geopolitical tensions that could impact investor sentiment and market performance.
MCHI Top 10 Holdings
MCHI is leaning heavily on China’s internet giants, but they’re not exactly firing on all cylinders. Tencent and Alibaba, big weights in the fund, have been lagging lately, putting a drag on overall returns, while consumer names like Xiaomi and Meituan are also losing steam after a mixed stretch. Balancing that weakness, the big state-owned banks—China Construction Bank and Bank of China—have been steadier, even slightly supportive, thanks to more resilient share performance. The fund is firmly China-focused, with a clear tilt toward consumer cyclical and communication-services plays tied to the country’s digital economy.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tencent Holdings | 14.94% | $913.49M | HK$4.11T | -6.00% | 75 Outperform | |
| Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. | 9.78% | $597.63M | HK$2.12T | -0.35% | 70 Outperform | |
| China Construction Bank | 3.50% | $214.23M | HK$2.21T | -1.40% | 82 Outperform | |
| Xiaomi | 2.25% | $137.77M | HK$667.13B | -55.04% | 71 Outperform | |
| Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | 2.25% | $137.33M | HK$2.93T | 10.69% | 78 Outperform | |
| Meituan | 2.14% | $131.11M | HK$489.04B | -40.09% | 74 Outperform | |
| PDD Holdings | 1.94% | $118.90M | $119.44B | -18.44% | 70 Outperform | |
| Netease Inc | 1.81% | $110.76M | HK$644.17B | -2.03% | 80 Outperform | |
| Ping An Insurance Company of China | 1.81% | $110.49M | HK$1.01T | -3.78% | 72 Outperform | |
| Bank of China | 1.71% | $104.79M | HK$2.00T | 8.03% | 77 Outperform |
MCHI Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
54.46
Negative
55.79
Negative
58.84
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.28
Negative
57.29
Neutral
82.81
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MCHI, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 52.22, equal to the 50-day MA of 54.46, and equal to the 200-day MA of 58.84, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.28 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 57.29 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 82.81 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for MCHI.
MCHI Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
54.15
-1.71
-3.06%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
―
―
―
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
―
―
―
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China Etf
―
―
―
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
―
―
―
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents