tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

MID.ETF - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

MID.ETF

American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID.ETF)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
MID.ETF, the American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong holdings like Cadence Design, Vertiv Holdings, and Monolithic Power, which show robust financial performance, positive earnings calls, and supportive technical trends. The fund’s rating is held back somewhat by positions such as Cloudflare, Vistra Energy, and MSCI, where high leverage, profitability challenges, and weaker technical signals introduce more risk. A key risk factor for this ETF is its exposure to several companies with high debt levels and rich valuations, which could increase volatility if market conditions worsen.
Positive Factors
Strong Leading Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Monolithic Power, Targa Resources, Johnson Controls, and TopBuild, have shown strong gains this year, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including industrials, health care, technology, consumer cyclical, financials, and others, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Solid Recent Short-Term Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains over the past month and is modestly positive for the year, showing some recent momentum despite a weaker three-month stretch.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Market Concentration
With nearly all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. market’s ups and downs.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some major positions like Zscaler, Tractor Supply, On Holding, and Vistra have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s returns.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is on the higher side for a passive investment option, which means more of the fund’s returns are used to cover fees.

MID.ETF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

MID.ETF Summary

The American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF focuses on mid-sized U.S. companies that are aiming to grow quickly and also score well on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards. It does not track a specific index, but instead selects a mix of growth-focused mid-cap stocks across sectors like industrials, health care, and technology. Well-known holdings include Cloudflare and Johnson Controls. An investor might choose this ETF to seek long-term growth while supporting companies with positive societal impact. However, it can be volatile, as mid-cap growth stocks can go up and down more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which means you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on mid-cap growth companies with ESG considerations, which requires more research and oversight. It’s a good option if you value professional management and ethical investing.
What would affect this ETF?The American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF could benefit from continued growth in the technology and industrial sectors, which make up a significant portion of its holdings, especially as innovation and infrastructure spending increase. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact mid-cap companies, particularly those in consumer cyclical and financial sectors. Additionally, regulatory changes or shifts in ESG priorities may influence the performance of companies within the fund.

MID.ETF Top 10 Holdings

This ETF leans heavily into U.S. mid-cap growth, with a clear tilt toward tech and industrial innovators. Monolithic Power and Cadence Design are doing much of the heavy lifting, riding strong demand for chips and design software. Johnson Controls and TopBuild add steady industrial muscle, benefiting from solid earnings and efficiency gains. On the flip side, Zscaler and Tractor Supply are losing steam, with weaker recent trading acting as a brake on returns. Overall, it’s a concentrated bet on U.S. mid-cap growth stories, especially in technology and industrials.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Cloudflare6.85%$5.89M$69.48B25.68%
61
Neutral
Monolithic Power6.34%$5.45M$76.15B116.66%
75
Outperform
Johnson Controls5.84%$5.02M$87.30B46.10%
70
Outperform
Targa Resources4.90%$4.21M$58.38B64.16%
74
Outperform
Tractor Supply4.54%$3.90M$16.03B-42.31%
73
Outperform
Vistra Corp4.29%$3.68M$47.10B-10.82%
65
Neutral
Cadence Design3.96%$3.40M$95.77B7.99%
78
Outperform
Wesco International3.93%$3.37M$17.47B106.98%
75
Outperform
Vertiv Holdings3.33%$2.87M$142.48B249.81%
77
Outperform
MSCI3.31%$2.85M$40.89B-1.83%
62
Neutral

MID.ETF Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
63.77
Positive
100DMA
65.01
Negative
200DMA
65.83
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
0.12
Positive
RSI
45.38
Neutral
STOCH
17.57
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MID.ETF, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 65.56, equal to the 50-day MA of 63.77, and equal to the 200-day MA of 65.83, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.12 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 45.38 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 17.57 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for MID.ETF.

MID.ETF Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$95.12M0.45%
66
Neutral
$46.44M0.80%
70
Neutral
$41.52M0.55%
67
Neutral
$32.96M0.59%
62
Neutral
$22.34M0.30%
72
Outperform
$7.71M0.35%
68
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
MID.ETF
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
64.15
0.53
0.83%
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
TSCM
TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
JMID
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement