tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

JMID - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

JMID

Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
JMID, the Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF, earns a solid overall rating mainly because several of its larger positions—like Comfort Systems USA (FIX), Dexcom (DXCM), Idexx Laboratories (IDXX), Vertiv (VRT), and Corpay (CPAY)—show strong financial performance, positive earnings call sentiment, and generally supportive technical trends, which together provide a strong growth-oriented foundation. The rating is held back somewhat by holdings such as Ameriprise Financial (AMP), Cencora (COR), and Sysco (SYY), where issues like weaker revenue or margins, high leverage, bearish or weak technical signals, and valuation concerns introduce added risk. Overall, the main risk factor is that many key holdings are richly valued and some carry high debt or operational challenges, which could make the ETF more sensitive to market volatility or economic slowdowns.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Comfort Systems, Vertiv Holdings, and Medpace, have shown strong year-to-date gains, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, including industrials, consumer cyclical, health care, technology, and financials, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is moderate for an actively managed mid-cap growth strategy, so fees are not excessively high relative to its category.
Negative Factors
Recent Short-Term Weakness
Despite a positive year-to-date result, the ETF has shown weak performance over the last three months, indicating recent pressure on returns.
Concentrated in U.S. Market
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies and only a very small allocation to the UK, the fund offers limited geographic diversification.
Exposure to Lagging Holding
One of the top holdings, Expedia, has delivered weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on the fund if the stock continues to struggle.

JMID vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

JMID Summary

The Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) invests mainly in medium-sized U.S. companies that are trying to grow quickly, rather than tracking a specific index. It spreads money across many areas of the economy, including industrials, consumer companies, health care, and technology. Well-known names in the fund include Expedia and Cardinal Health. Someone might invest in JMID to seek higher growth than large, established companies while still avoiding the smallest, riskiest stocks. A key risk is that growth-focused mid-cap stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) has an expense ratio of 0.3%, which means you’ll pay $3 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, aiming to select mid-cap stocks with strong growth potential rather than tracking a broad index.
What would affect this ETF?The Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and consumer cyclical, as well as increased spending in industries such as healthcare and financials. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth-focused companies, and economic slowdowns, which could reduce consumer spending and industrial activity. Its U.S. focus also makes it sensitive to domestic regulatory changes and geopolitical events.

JMID Top 10 Holdings

JMID is leaning hard into U.S. mid-cap growth, with industrial standouts Vertiv and Comfort Systems doing much of the heavy lifting as their momentum keeps climbing. Howmet Aerospace adds to that industrial engine, giving the fund a clear tilt toward economically sensitive names. On the flip side, Ameriprise and Idexx are losing a bit of steam, acting more like brakes than boosters lately. Steadier health-care players like Cencora and Cardinal Health help smooth the ride, but this ETF’s story is mostly about industrial strength driving performance.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Vertiv Holdings5.07%$889.80K$102.64B216.30%
77
Outperform
Howmet Aerospace4.77%$836.38K$100.90B102.32%
67
Neutral
Cencora3.79%$666.07K$68.14B37.91%
70
Neutral
Comfort Systems3.13%$549.24K$49.50B326.28%
80
Outperform
Ameriprise Financial2.85%$499.78K$41.09B-6.20%
64
Neutral
Idexx Laboratories2.42%$424.87K$47.82B45.62%
78
Outperform
Tapestry2.40%$420.92K$29.44B102.84%
69
Neutral
Dexcom2.29%$401.99K$25.52B-6.29%
79
Outperform
Corpay Inc2.28%$400.16K$22.49B-1.03%
75
Outperform
Sysco2.09%$366.41K$40.50B14.83%
71
Outperform

JMID Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
29.69
Negative
100DMA
29.55
Negative
200DMA
29.37
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.14
Positive
RSI
41.89
Neutral
STOCH
30.40
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For JMID, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.59, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.69, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.37, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.14 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 41.89 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 30.40 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for JMID.

JMID Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$17.42M0.30%
72
Outperform
$89.88M0.45%
68
Neutral
$39.97M0.80%
70
Neutral
$39.54M0.55%
71
Outperform
$33.08M0.59%
66
Neutral
$7.27M0.35%
68
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
JMID
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
28.94
3.54
13.94%
MID.ETF
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
TSCM
TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement