tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

JMID - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

JMID

Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
JMID, the Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong, growing companies like Expedia, Comfort Systems USA, Idexx Laboratories, and Medpace, all of which show robust financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and generally supportive technical trends. However, some holdings such as Ameriprise Financial, Cardinal Health, and Somnigroup International face challenges like weaker margins, leverage and valuation concerns, or bearish/overbought technical signals, which temper the fund’s rating. The main risk factor is that several key holdings appear richly valued or show signs of technical or financial caution, which could increase volatility if growth expectations are not met.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Roblox and Vertiv Holdings, have delivered strong year-to-date gains, supporting the ETF's overall performance.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, including Industrials, Consumer Cyclical, and Technology, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The ETF has a relatively low expense ratio, making it cost-effective compared to many actively managed funds.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
With over 98% of its geographic exposure in the U.S., the ETF lacks diversification across global markets.
Underperforming Holdings
Some top holdings, such as Ameriprise Financial and Ares Management, have lagged in year-to-date performance, potentially dragging down returns.
Small Asset Base
The ETF has relatively low assets under management, which could lead to less liquidity and higher trading costs for investors.

JMID vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

JMID Summary

The Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) focuses on mid-sized companies in the U.S. that are positioned for growth. It includes firms like Royal Caribbean and Roblox, which are known for their innovative approaches and potential to expand. This ETF is designed for investors who want to diversify their portfolios with companies that are past the startup phase but still have room to grow. However, since it targets mid-cap stocks, its performance can be more volatile than larger, more established companies, meaning the value of your investment may go up and down with market trends.
How much will it cost me?The Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) has an expense ratio of 0.3%, which means you’ll pay $3 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, aiming to select mid-cap stocks with strong growth potential rather than tracking a broad index.
What would affect this ETF?The Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and consumer cyclical, as well as increased spending in industries such as healthcare and financials. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth-focused companies, and economic slowdowns, which could reduce consumer spending and industrial activity. Its U.S. focus also makes it sensitive to domestic regulatory changes and geopolitical events.

JMID Top 10 Holdings

The Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF is leaning heavily into growth-oriented sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Health Care, with a strong U.S. focus. Comfort Systems and Howmet Aerospace are rising stars, driving performance with robust financial results and strategic initiatives. Expedia is also gaining momentum, buoyed by its innovative strategies and solid earnings. On the flip side, GoDaddy is lagging, weighed down by weak revenue growth and bearish technical signals. Overall, the fund’s positioning reflects a balanced approach to mid-cap growth, though its reliance on a few standout names could amplify volatility.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Cencora3.51%$729.90K$65.12B42.54%
70
Neutral
Vertiv Holdings3.06%$636.85K$62.54B37.11%
77
Outperform
Ameriprise Financial3.02%$628.83K$47.17B-3.13%
64
Neutral
Expedia2.88%$600.21K$36.31B59.14%
80
Outperform
Idexx Laboratories2.78%$578.46K$56.96B73.13%
78
Outperform
Comfort Systems2.56%$532.38K$35.64B122.58%
80
Outperform
Howmet Aerospace2.45%$509.09K$87.76B84.70%
67
Neutral
Cardinal Health2.31%$481.52K$47.78B63.28%
66
Neutral
Somnigroup International2.14%$444.69K$19.69B63.14%
72
Outperform
Medpace Holdings2.08%$433.81K$16.76B81.08%
79
Outperform

JMID Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
29.36
Positive
100DMA
29.64
Positive
200DMA
28.57
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.17
Negative
RSI
60.18
Neutral
STOCH
92.90
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For JMID, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.59, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.36, and equal to the 200-day MA of 28.57, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.17 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 60.18 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 92.90 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for JMID.

JMID Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$19.57M0.30%
$40.41M0.80%
$33.35M0.59%
$9.08M0.55%
$7.27M0.35%
$4.19M0.88%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
JMID
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
30.12
2.25
8.07%
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
TSCM
TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
EPMB
Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement