Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
MCDS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Generally Strong Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions, such as Western Digital, Teradyne, and Ross Stores, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s overall returns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is moderate for an actively managed, factor-based strategy, so fees are not excessively high relative to its approach.
Negative Factors
Very Small Asset Base
The ETF manages a relatively small amount of money, which can lead to lower trading volume and potentially wider bid-ask spreads for investors.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With the vast majority of its holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Higher Cost Than Basic Index ETFs
While not extreme, the expense ratio is higher than many simple index-tracking ETFs, which could slightly reduce long-term net returns compared with cheaper passive options.
MCDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM7.39M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta0.90
IssuerJPMorgan
Inception DateAug 08, 2024
Dividend Yield1.17%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume76
30 Day Avg. Volume60
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
68.90Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering181
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
MCDS Summary
The JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is an actively managed fund that focuses on mid-sized U.S. companies, using data science to pick stocks instead of tracking a set index. It spreads investments across many sectors, including industrials, technology, and health care, and holds well-known names like Western Digital and Hilton. Someone might consider this ETF for growth potential and diversification, since mid-cap companies can offer a balance between younger, fast-growing firms and more established businesses. A key risk is that mid-cap stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can go up and down with the market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund uses an actively managed, data-driven approach to select mid-cap stocks, requiring more research and management effort compared to passively managed ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The MCDS ETF, focused on U.S. mid-cap companies, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and industrials, which are significant parts of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact financial and real estate holdings, or economic slowdowns that affect consumer spending and cyclical sectors. Regulatory changes or shifts in energy policy could also influence its performance, given its exposure to energy and utilities.
MCDS Top 10 Holdings
This mid-cap, U.S.-focused ETF leans into industrials and tech, with a clear tilt toward data-driven growth stories. Western Digital and Teradyne are doing much of the heavy lifting, riding strong momentum tied to AI and chip demand. Retail name Ross Stores and industrial player Dover are also quietly pulling their weight with steady, rising trends. On the softer side, Xcel Energy has been more of a speed bump, with utilities losing a bit of spark, while Hilton’s mixed performance keeps it from being a true engine for the fund.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ― | 4.14% | $308.92K | ― | ― | ― | |
| Western Digital | 1.56% | $116.61K | $92.81B | 315.41% | 77 Outperform | |
| Howmet Aerospace | 1.49% | $111.04K | $92.82B | 83.47% | 67 Neutral | |
| Teradyne | 1.43% | $106.72K | $50.34B | 174.64% | 71 Outperform | |
| Hilton Worldwide Holdings | 1.18% | $87.79K | $75.57B | 21.18% | 67 Neutral | |
| Cardinal Health | 1.18% | $87.68K | $52.77B | 70.40% | 66 Neutral | |
| Dover | 1.17% | $87.63K | $31.97B | 13.96% | 79 Outperform | |
| Xcel Energy | 1.10% | $82.36K | $46.09B | 15.11% | 61 Neutral | |
| M&T Bank | 1.09% | $81.68K | $36.08B | 16.39% | 76 Outperform | |
| Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies | 1.08% | $80.91K | $43.49B | 34.86% | 79 Outperform |
MCDS Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
59.94
Positive
58.66
Positive
57.12
Positive
Market Momentum
0.56
Negative
58.36
Neutral
88.24
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MCDS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 60.92, equal to the 50-day MA of 59.94, and equal to the 200-day MA of 57.12, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.56 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 58.36 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 88.24 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MCDS.
MCDS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
61.58
4.64
8.15%
MID.ETF
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
―
―
―
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
TSCM
TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF
―
―
―
EPMB
Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents