MCDS - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS)

Rating:68Neutral

Price Target:―

The JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) has a solid overall rating, supported by strong contributions from holdings like Dover (DOV) and Western Digital (WDC). Dover stands out for its robust financial performance, revenue growth, and strategic actions, while Western Digital benefits from positive technical indicators and AI-driven demand. However, weaker holdings like Xcel Energy (XEL), which faces financial risks and bearish momentum, may have slightly weighed on the fund’s overall score. A potential risk for the ETF is its exposure to companies with high leverage, which could impact performance during periods of financial instability.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings

Several of the ETF’s largest positions, such as Howmet Aerospace and Quanta Services, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting overall returns.

Broad Sector Diversification

The ETF is spread across 11 sectors, reducing the risk of being overly exposed to a single industry.

Reasonable Expense Ratio

With an expense ratio of 0.35%, the fund is relatively affordable compared to many actively managed ETFs.

Negative Factors

High Geographic Concentration

The ETF has 95% exposure to U.S. companies, leaving it vulnerable to domestic market downturns.

Mixed Short-Term Performance

The fund’s one-month performance has been slightly negative, suggesting recent volatility or weaker momentum.

Underweight in Defensive Sectors

Sectors like Consumer Defensive and Utilities have relatively low weights, which could limit protection during market downturns.

MCDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM7.14M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.35%

Beta0.91

IssuerJPMorgan

Inception DateAug 08, 2024

Dividend Yield1.21%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedNo Underlying Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume43

30 Day Avg. Volume46

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

67.23

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering181

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

MCDS Summary

The JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is an investment fund that focuses on mid-sized companies, which often balance growth potential and stability. Using advanced data analysis, it selects firms with strong financial health and promising growth. Some of its holdings include well-known companies like Hilton Worldwide Holdings and State Street. This ETF is ideal for investors looking to diversify their portfolio and tap into the potential of mid-cap stocks. However, new investors should note that the fund’s performance can fluctuate with market conditions, as mid-cap stocks may be more volatile than larger, established companies.

How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund uses an actively managed, data-driven approach to select mid-cap stocks, requiring more research and management effort compared to passively managed ETFs.

What would affect this ETF?The MCDS ETF, focused on U.S. mid-cap companies, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and industrials, which are significant parts of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact financial and real estate holdings, or economic slowdowns that affect consumer spending and cyclical sectors. Regulatory changes or shifts in energy policy could also influence its performance, given its exposure to energy and utilities.

MCDS Top 10 Holdings

The JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) leans heavily into mid-cap U.S. equities, with a notable tilt toward industrials and technology. Western Digital is a standout performer, riding strong demand and AI-driven growth, while State Street’s strategic partnerships and earnings momentum add steady support. On the flip side, Xcel Energy and CMS Energy are lagging, weighed down by financial risks and bearish sentiment. The fund’s diverse sector exposure balances growth and stability, but its reliance on a few rising names like Western Digital suggests concentrated bets driving recent performance.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
	―	3.90%	$278.21K	―	―	―
HWM	Howmet Aerospace	1.40%	$100.13K	$84.92B	89.89%	67 Neutral
CAH	Cardinal Health	1.13%	$80.23K	$49.49B	74.83%	66 Neutral
HLT	Hilton Worldwide Holdings	1.11%	$78.99K	$68.22B	17.42%	67 Neutral
XEL	Xcel Energy	1.10%	$78.06K	$44.02B	9.22%	61 Neutral
STT	State Street	1.09%	$77.48K	$36.95B	34.18%	75 Outperform
WDC	Western Digital	1.06%	$75.30K	$62.07B	199.08%	77 Outperform
DOV	Dover	1.05%	$75.02K	$27.45B	6.28%	79 Outperform
RJF	Raymond James Financial	1.03%	$73.54K	$32.51B	5.34%	76 Outperform
MTB	M&T Bank	1.01%	$71.97K	$31.86B	9.54%	76 Outperform

MCDS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

57.85

Positive

100DMA

57.52

Positive

200DMA

55.53

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

0.48

Negative

RSI

62.27

Neutral

STOCH

88.08

Negative

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MCDS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 58.75, equal to the 50-day MA of 57.85, and equal to the 200-day MA of 55.53, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.48 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.27 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 88.08 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MCDS.

MCDS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
MCDS	―	―	$7.14M	0.35%	―
AFMC	―	―	$98.55M	0.65%	―
MID.ETF	―	―	$95.86M	0.45%	―
KMID	―	―	$37.12M	0.80%	―
MMID	―	―	$32.63M	0.59%	―
EPMB	―	―	$4.06M	0.88%	―

Performance Comparison

MCDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF

59.50

4.56

8.30%

AFMC

First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF

―

MID.ETF

American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF

―

KMID

Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF

―

MMID

MFS Active Mid Cap ETF

―

EPMB

Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents