tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GDOC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GDOC

Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
GDOC, the Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven mainly by high-quality healthcare leaders like Merck, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, and Intuitive Surgical, all of which show strong financial performance, positive earnings calls, and promising growth pipelines. These strengths are partly offset by holdings such as Guardant Health, where financial instability and valuation concerns introduce more risk, and by several positions with high valuations and some cash flow or debt challenges, making valuation and financial health the key risk factors to watch.
Positive Factors
Established Healthcare Leaders in Top Holdings
Several major pharmaceutical and medical technology companies sit among the largest positions, providing exposure to well-known, financially solid businesses.
Focused Healthcare Exposure
The fund is heavily concentrated in the health care sector, which can benefit investors who want targeted exposure to long-term trends in medicine and biotechnology.
Global Healthcare Reach
While most holdings are U.S.-based, the ETF also includes companies from Switzerland, Japan, and France, adding some international diversification within healthcare.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high annual fee means more of the investment return is used to cover costs instead of staying in investors’ pockets.
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has shown negative performance over the year to date and over the last three months, indicating recent struggles in its strategy or holdings.
Concentration in a Single Sector and a Few Stocks
With most assets in healthcare and a meaningful share in a small number of companies, investors face higher risk if this sector or these specific stocks perform poorly.

GDOC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GDOC Summary

The Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) focuses on the future of health care, especially health care technology like digital health tools, telemedicine, biotech, and advanced medical devices. It does not track a traditional index, but instead holds a selected mix of health-focused companies, mainly in the U.S. Well-known holdings include Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson. Someone might invest in GDOC to seek long-term growth from innovation in medicine and health technology. However, it is concentrated in one sector, so its price can rise and fall sharply with changes in the health care industry.
How much will it cost me?The Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, meaning you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on specialized health care technology companies that require more research and expertise to select.
What would affect this ETF?The Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) could benefit from increasing demand for health care technology, driven by advancements in telemedicine, biotech, and medical devices, as well as global aging populations requiring innovative solutions. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in the health care sector, fluctuating interest rates affecting growth-focused companies, and potential competition or setbacks in technological adoption. Its global exposure and focus on leading companies like Eli Lilly and Boston Scientific provide both opportunities and risks tied to the broader health care industry trends.

GDOC Top 10 Holdings

GDOC is firmly hitched to the future of health care, with big pharma and cutting-edge medtech doing most of the heavy lifting. Eli Lilly, Merck, and a surging Guardant Health are the main engines, with rising share prices helping power the fund. On the flip side, Boston Scientific, Thermo Fisher, and Intuitive Surgical have been losing steam lately, acting as a bit of a drag. The portfolio is almost entirely health care and health tech, with a global flavor thanks to names like AstraZeneca, Argenx, and Japan’s HOYA alongside U.S. leaders.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Eli Lilly & Co12.44%$2.49M$1.04T44.85%
72
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson8.40%$1.68M$542.42B43.83%
78
Outperform
Merck & Company5.89%$1.18M$293.22B51.04%
80
Outperform
AstraZeneca5.06%$1.01M$287.95B27.05%
80
Outperform
Boston Scientific4.43%$887.29K$71.81B-53.94%
79
Outperform
Thermo Fisher4.41%$883.69K$183.03B24.61%
72
Outperform
Guardant Health4.31%$862.68K$17.20B206.74%
61
Neutral
Intuitive Surgical4.15%$831.78K$150.39B-25.49%
78
Outperform
Argenx Se4.14%$829.07K$51.51B43.02%
79
Outperform
HOYA3.76%$752.57K¥9.05T34.04%
74
Outperform

GDOC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
32.50
Positive
100DMA
33.57
Negative
200DMA
33.81
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
0.23
Negative
RSI
55.99
Neutral
STOCH
85.62
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GDOC, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 32.40, equal to the 50-day MA of 32.50, and equal to the 200-day MA of 33.81, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.23 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 55.99 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 85.62 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for GDOC.

GDOC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$19.85M0.75%
70
Outperform
$52.19M0.75%
66
Neutral
$49.76M0.59%
57
Neutral
$41.08M0.50%
57
Neutral
$37.73M0.80%
62
Neutral
$2.37M0.85%
68
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
32.61
1.31
4.19%
HRTS
Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF
OZEM
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
LGHT
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement