tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

LGHT - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

LGHT

Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
LGHT, the Langar Global HealthTech ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong, well-established holdings like Intuitive Surgical, GE Healthcare, and Dexcom, which show healthy financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and generally supportive technical trends. However, weaker names such as Koninklijke Philips and BioNTech, which face financial challenges and bearish or neutral trading signals, weigh on the fund’s appeal. The main risk factor is its concentration in health technology, meaning sector-specific issues like regulation, tariffs, or valuation pressures could affect many holdings at once.
Positive Factors
Focused HealthTech Theme
The ETF targets global health technology companies, giving investors concentrated exposure to a growing, innovation-driven area of healthcare.
Several Strong-Performing Core Holdings
Key positions such as Resmed, IQVIA, Philips, Dexcom, and BioNTech have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Broad Mix Within HealthTech Leaders
The top holdings include a mix of medical device makers, healthcare services, and biotech-related firms, which helps spread risk within the health technology space.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high fee means more of the investment return goes to costs instead of staying in investors’ pockets.
Heavy Concentration in a Few Stocks
A small number of companies make up a large share of the portfolio, so weakness in any of these names can significantly affect the ETF’s performance.
Narrow Sector and Geographic Exposure
With most assets in U.S. healthcare stocks, the ETF is vulnerable to downturns in that single sector and country rather than being cushioned by broader global or multi-sector diversification.

LGHT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

LGHT Summary

The Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) invests in companies using technology to improve healthcare, rather than tracking a traditional index. It focuses on health care technology, including digital health tools, telemedicine, medical devices, and biotech innovations. Well-known holdings include Intuitive Surgical and GE Healthcare Technologies. Someone might consider this ETF if they want long-term growth potential from advances in medical technology and a way to diversify within the healthcare sector. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in health care technology stocks, so its price can swing more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) has an expense ratio of 0.85%, meaning you’ll pay $8.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on specialized healthcare technology companies rather than tracking a broad index.
What would affect this ETF?The Langar Global HealthTech ETF could benefit from growing demand for innovative healthcare solutions, such as telemedicine and advanced medical devices, driven by aging populations and technological advancements. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in healthcare, fluctuating global economic conditions, and potential competition within the health tech sector. Its global exposure and focus on leading companies like Intuitive Surgical and Siemens Healthineers position it well for long-term growth but also make it sensitive to international market volatility.

LGHT Top 10 Holdings

LGHT is a pure play on global health-tech, with performance heavily shaped by a few big names. Intuitive Surgical has been losing steam lately, acting as a bit of a brake on returns, while Insulet and Veeva are clearly lagging and adding pressure. On the brighter side, GE Healthcare and Zimmer Biomet have been rising, helping to steady the ship, with Dexcom offering a more mixed but generally supportive backdrop. With nearly everything tied to healthcare technology and spread across U.S. and international names, this ETF is both sector-focused and globally diversified.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Intuitive Surgical15.11%$584.19K$177.84B-14.83%
78
Outperform
Resmed10.77%$416.41K$37.72B11.84%
76
Outperform
GE Healthcare Technologies Inc9.80%$379.04K$37.80B-7.53%
78
Outperform
Insulet6.92%$267.53K$18.15B-14.47%
70
Outperform
Veeva Systems6.85%$264.88K$29.79B-20.14%
66
Neutral
Koninklijke Philips6.42%$248.27K$29.74B22.35%
50
Neutral
Dexcom5.40%$208.64K$28.02B-17.68%
79
Outperform
IQVIA Holdings5.29%$204.38K$29.03B-13.31%
73
Outperform
Siemens Healthineers AG Unsponsored ADR4.71%$182.02K$54.44B-14.34%
74
Outperform
Zimmer Biomet Holdings4.27%$165.11K$19.47B-5.80%
73
Outperform

LGHT Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
9.98
Negative
100DMA
10.09
Negative
200DMA
10.18
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.15
Negative
RSI
45.71
Neutral
STOCH
88.56
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For LGHT, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 9.73, equal to the 50-day MA of 9.98, and equal to the 200-day MA of 10.18, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.15 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 45.71 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 88.56 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for LGHT.

LGHT Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$3.86M0.85%
68
Neutral
$61.05M0.50%
60
Neutral
$58.96M0.59%
61
Neutral
$54.98M0.18%
68
Neutral
$26.90M0.80%
62
Neutral
$22.56M0.75%
70
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
LGHT
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
9.67
-1.18
-10.88%
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
OZEM
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF
HRTS
Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement