tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

HRTS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

HRTS

Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF (HRTS)

Rating:65Neutral
Price Target:
HRTS, the Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by high-quality healthcare leaders like Merck, AstraZeneca, and Novartis, which show strong financial performance, promising drug pipelines, and supportive earnings call commentary. Other major positions such as Eli Lilly, UnitedHealth, Thermo Fisher, Johnson & Johnson, and Gilead also add strength through solid fundamentals and strategic growth initiatives, though some face valuation concerns, leverage and cash flow risks, or challenges in specific business segments. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in a single area of healthcare (cardiovascular and metabolic-related companies), which can make performance more sensitive to sector-specific setbacks or regulatory changes.
Positive Factors
Exposure to Leading Healthcare Companies
The ETF holds several well-known global healthcare leaders, which can provide stability and long-term growth potential.
Many Top Holdings Showing Solid Momentum
Several of the largest positions, such as AstraZeneca, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, Gilead, and Novartis, have shown strong recent performance, helping support the fund.
Focused Theme in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health
The fund’s concentration in cardiovascular and metabolic healthcare targets a specific area of medical need that may benefit from ongoing innovation and demand.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into returns over time compared with lower-cost funds.
Recent Weak Overall Performance
The fund has delivered negative returns so far this year and over the last three months, indicating recent performance has been soft.
Concentration in U.S. Healthcare Stocks
With most assets in U.S. companies and almost all in the healthcare sector, the ETF is heavily exposed to one country and one industry, increasing sensitivity to sector-specific and regulatory risks.

HRTS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

HRTS Summary

The Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF (HRTS) is a health care–focused fund that invests in companies working on treatments and technologies for heart disease, diabetes, and other metabolic conditions. It doesn’t track a traditional index, but instead follows this specific medical theme. Top holdings include well-known names like Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson. Someone might invest in HRTS to seek long-term growth from medical innovation and to get targeted exposure to leading drug and biotech companies. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in health care, so its value can swing with news and trends in this one sector.
How much will it cost me?The Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF (HRTS) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, meaning you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a specialized niche within the health care sector.
What would affect this ETF?The HRTS ETF, focused on cardiovascular and metabolic health, could benefit from growing demand for innovative treatments as heart disease and diabetes remain global health priorities. Positive trends like advancements in biotech and pharmaceutical research, along with increased healthcare spending, may drive growth for its top holdings such as Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca. However, challenges like regulatory hurdles, patent expirations, or economic downturns affecting healthcare budgets could negatively impact the ETF's performance.

HRTS Top 10 Holdings

HRTS is very much a healthcare specialist, with its top spots dominated by big global drugmakers. Eli Lilly is the star of the show, with a rising share price helping power the fund as investors stay excited about its obesity and diabetes pipeline. UnitedHealth and Merck are also pulling their weight, adding steady momentum from the managed-care and pharma corners. On the flip side, Thermo Fisher has been lagging, acting like a small anchor on returns. With holdings spread across the U.S. and Europe, the ETF is globally diversified but tightly focused on cardiovascular and metabolic medicine.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Eli Lilly & Co10.41%$5.23M$1.00T46.82%
72
Outperform
5.59%$2.81M
UnitedHealth5.47%$2.75M$352.79B27.75%
72
Outperform
Roche Holding4.55%$2.29M$339.59B33.13%
74
Outperform
Merck & Company4.13%$2.08M$302.33B54.30%
80
Outperform
AstraZeneca4.09%$2.06M$290.33B33.16%
80
Outperform
Thermo Fisher3.77%$1.89M$166.59B11.06%
72
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson3.64%$1.83M$564.11B50.20%
78
Outperform
Gilead Sciences3.52%$1.77M$166.82B22.59%
78
Outperform
Novartis AG3.38%$1.70MCHF218.09B26.43%
80
Outperform

HRTS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
33.67
Positive
100DMA
34.61
Negative
200DMA
33.37
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.13
Negative
RSI
59.76
Neutral
STOCH
86.93
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For HRTS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.77, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.67, and equal to the 200-day MA of 33.37, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.13 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 59.76 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 86.93 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for HRTS.

HRTS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$51.65M0.75%
65
Neutral
$48.77M0.59%
57
Neutral
$42.81M0.50%
57
Neutral
$37.28M0.80%
61
Neutral
$35.12M1.00%
44
Neutral
$20.13M0.44%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
HRTS
Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF
34.50
7.10
25.91%
OZEM
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
TMED
T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement