tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

OZEM - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

OZEM

Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM)

Rating:58Neutral
Price Target:
The Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) has a moderate overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong and weaker holdings. Eli Lilly & Co (LLY) and Novo Nordisk (NVO) are key contributors to the fund’s rating, driven by their strong financial performance, strategic pipeline advancements, and market share gains. However, weaker holdings like Terns Pharmaceuticals (TERN) and Structure Therapeutics (GPCR), which face financial sustainability risks and lack profitability, weigh on the ETF’s overall score. A potential risk factor is the concentration in early-stage biotech companies, which can introduce volatility due to their speculative nature and reliance on future R&D success.
Positive Factors
Strong Sector Focus
The ETF is heavily weighted in the health care sector, which has shown resilience and growth potential in the weight loss and GLP-1 drug space.
Healthy Performance Trends
The fund has delivered steady gains year-to-date and over the past three months, indicating positive momentum.
Global Diversification
While primarily focused on U.S. companies, the ETF includes exposure to international markets like Hong Kong, Japan, and Switzerland, adding geographic balance.
Negative Factors
Underperforming Key Holdings
Several top holdings, including Novo Nordisk and Viking Therapeutics, have lagged in year-to-date performance, which could weigh on overall returns.
High Sector Concentration
With over 85% of the portfolio in health care, the fund is highly exposed to risks specific to this sector.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is higher than some low-cost alternatives, which could reduce net returns for long-term investors.

OZEM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

OZEM Summary

The Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF (Ticker: OZEM) focuses on companies in the healthcare sector, particularly those involved in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and life sciences. It targets firms developing innovative treatments for obesity and metabolic disorders, including well-known names like Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly. This ETF could appeal to investors looking for growth opportunities in the health and wellness industry, which is becoming increasingly important globally. However, new investors should be aware that the ETF is heavily concentrated in healthcare, meaning its performance could be impacted by changes in that sector or regulatory challenges.
How much will it cost me?The Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, meaning you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a niche sector like pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, which requires more research and specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF could benefit from growing global demand for innovative health solutions, particularly in obesity and metabolic disorder treatments, as well as advancements in biotechnology and pharmaceuticals led by top holdings like Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly. However, potential risks include regulatory hurdles, competition in the weight management sector, and broader economic challenges that may impact healthcare spending or innovation funding. Global exposure also means the ETF could be affected by geopolitical events or currency fluctuations.

OZEM Top 10 Holdings

The Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) is heavily concentrated in the healthcare sector, with a clear focus on pharmaceutical and biotech companies driving innovation in weight management and metabolic health. Eli Lilly is a standout performer, bolstered by strong revenue growth and a promising drug pipeline, providing a solid lift to the fund. Novo Nordisk, however, has been lagging recently due to market share challenges and restructuring efforts. Meanwhile, smaller holdings like Terns Pharmaceuticals are rising sharply, adding speculative energy to the mix. With a global footprint, this ETF leans heavily on a few key players, making it both exciting and high-risk for investors.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Eli Lilly & Co18.36%$8.49M$1.00T30.07%
71
Outperform
Novo Nordisk13.26%$6.13M$217.00B-55.43%
73
Outperform
Terns Pharmaceuticals8.53%$3.95M$2.48B347.64%
45
Neutral
Viking Therapeutics5.45%$2.52M$3.91B-32.92%
53
Neutral
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. Sponsored ADR5.21%$2.41M$2.10B3.97%
31
Underperform
5.06%$2.34M
Roche Holding AG4.97%$2.30MCHF247.26B36.34%
73
Outperform
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co4.74%$2.19M¥13.27T14.66%
80
Outperform
Amgen3.66%$1.70M$181.73B21.26%
77
Outperform
AstraZeneca3.56%$1.65M$283.39B35.02%
79
Outperform

OZEM Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
29.49
Positive
100DMA
27.55
Positive
200DMA
26.07
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.09
Positive
RSI
59.90
Neutral
STOCH
41.40
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OZEM, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 31.64, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.49, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.07, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.09 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 59.90 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 41.40 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for OZEM.

OZEM Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$43.26M0.59%
$63.69M0.50%
$53.15M0.75%
$24.63M0.80%
$21.97M0.75%
$18.53M1.00%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
OZEM
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF
32.10
5.00
18.45%
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
HRTS
Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement