tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

EATZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

EATZ

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ)

Rating:56Neutral
Price Target:
EATZ, the AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF, has a solid but not top-tier rating, reflecting a mix of strong restaurant leaders and some holdings with notable risks. Top positions like Yum China, Darden Restaurants, US Foods, and Restaurant Brands International support the fund’s quality through strong financial performance, positive earnings sentiment, and generally favorable technical or valuation profiles. However, more leveraged and technically weaker names such as Nathan’s Famous, Yum! Brands, and others with bearish trends or overvaluation concerns, along with the fund’s concentrated focus on the restaurant and food-service sector, introduce higher risk and help keep the overall rating more moderate.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past few months, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Holdings Showing Strength
Several of the largest positions, such as Brinker International, Casey's General, US Foods, Dine Brands, and Darden Restaurants, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Focused Industry Exposure
The heavy weighting in restaurant-related consumer cyclical companies gives investors targeted exposure to a specific part of the consumer economy.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost funds.
Concentrated Sector Risk
With most assets in the consumer cyclical sector, the fund is vulnerable to downturns in restaurant and related consumer spending.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The portfolio is heavily focused on U.S. companies, offering little protection if the U.S. market or economy weakens.

EATZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

EATZ Summary

The AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) is a fund that focuses on the restaurant industry, part of the consumer discretionary sector. It doesn’t track a set index, but instead holds a mix of U.S.-focused restaurant and dining-related companies, from fast food to casual and sit-down chains. Well-known names in the fund include Darden Restaurants (Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse) and Yum! Brands (KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut). Someone might invest for targeted growth in the dining and leisure theme and added diversification. A key risk is that restaurant stocks can be very sensitive to the economy and consumer spending, so prices can swing up and down.
How much will it cost me?The AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) has an expense ratio of 0.99%, which means you’ll pay $9.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, meaning professionals are selecting and managing the investments rather than following a preset index.
What would affect this ETF?The AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) could benefit from positive trends like increased consumer spending on dining out, innovations in food delivery services, and a strong U.S. economy supporting discretionary spending. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, inflation affecting food costs, and economic slowdowns that reduce consumer demand for dining and leisure activities. Regulatory changes or labor shortages in the restaurant industry could also impact its performance.

EATZ Top 10 Holdings

EATZ is a pure play on the restaurant world, with most of its firepower in U.S.-listed casual and quick-service names. Brinker International sits in the driver’s seat but has been lagging lately, acting more like a headwind than a tailwind. In contrast, steadier names like Darden Restaurants and Restaurant Brands International have been quietly rising, helping to prop up returns. US Foods and Casey’s General Stores add a food-service and convenience-store twist, with mixed but generally rising trends, while Cheesecake Factory’s recent wobble has added a bit of turbulence.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Brinker International9.68%$185.30K$6.69B5.03%
70
Neutral
US Foods Holding6.30%$120.56K$20.22B41.55%
74
Outperform
Casey's General6.14%$117.55K$28.03B72.46%
68
Neutral
Restaurant Brands International5.54%$105.95K$35.36B25.46%
75
Outperform
Krispy Kreme5.22%$99.90K$573.43M-24.66%
57
Neutral
Yum! Brands4.98%$95.30K$44.35B10.30%
59
Neutral
Darden Restaurants4.68%$89.61K$22.41B-0.36%
76
Outperform
Yum China Holdings4.62%$88.35K$17.59B11.18%
78
Outperform
Cheesecake Factory4.58%$87.65K$2.87B20.50%
66
Neutral
Nathan's Famous4.48%$85.73K$412.96M6.59%
61
Neutral

EATZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
26.87
Negative
100DMA
26.68
Positive
200DMA
27.39
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.20
Negative
RSI
54.78
Neutral
STOCH
88.61
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EATZ, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.13, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.87, and equal to the 200-day MA of 27.39, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.20 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 54.78 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 88.61 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for EATZ.

EATZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.83M1.00%
56
Neutral
$93.18M0.54%
53
Neutral
$80.68M0.85%
65
Neutral
$60.71M1.06%
72
Outperform
$27.15M0.18%
70
Outperform
$1.71M0.99%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
26.83
1.05
4.07%
LFSC
F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF
CEPI
REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
IEDI
iShares Evolved US Discretionary Spending ETF
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement