tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

EATZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

EATZ

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ)

Rating:60Neutral
Price Target:
EATZ, the AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF, has a solid but not top-tier rating, reflecting a mix of strong restaurant leaders and some weaker names. Standout holdings like Yum China and Darden Restaurants support the fund with robust financial performance, positive earnings sentiment, and healthy growth prospects, while companies such as Krispy Kreme and Nathan’s Famous, which face financial challenges and weaker momentum, weigh on the overall picture. The main risk is the fund’s concentration in the restaurant and food-service industry, which makes it sensitive to sector-specific issues like consumer spending trends, cost inflation, and leverage across several holdings.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Casey's General and US Foods, have shown strong gains this year, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Focused Restaurant Exposure
The ETF targets restaurant and related companies, giving investors a simple way to invest in this specific consumer theme without picking individual stocks.
Mostly Positive Recent Performance
The fund has delivered solid gains so far this year and over the past month, showing improving momentum despite a recent three‑month dip.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into returns over time compared with lower-cost funds.
Concentrated Sector Risk
With most assets in consumer cyclical restaurant names, the fund is highly sensitive to economic slowdowns and changes in consumer spending.
Small Asset Base
The fund manages a low level of assets, which can increase the risk of closure and may lead to wider trading spreads for investors.

EATZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

EATZ Summary

The AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) is a fund that focuses on the restaurant and dining industry, mainly in the U.S. It doesn’t track a traditional index, but instead holds a mix of well-known restaurant companies and related businesses, from fast food to sit-down chains. Big names include Yum! Brands (KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut) and Darden Restaurants (Olive Garden). Someone might invest in EATZ to bet on long-term growth in eating out and food-away-from-home trends. A key risk is that it’s concentrated in restaurant and consumer spending, so it can rise or fall sharply with the economy and changing dining habits.
How much will it cost me?The AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) has an expense ratio of 0.99%, which means you’ll pay $9.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, meaning professionals are selecting and managing the investments rather than following a preset index.
What would affect this ETF?The AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) could benefit from positive trends like increased consumer spending on dining out, innovations in food delivery services, and a strong U.S. economy supporting discretionary spending. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, inflation affecting food costs, and economic slowdowns that reduce consumer demand for dining and leisure activities. Regulatory changes or labor shortages in the restaurant industry could also impact its performance.

EATZ Top 10 Holdings

EATZ is a pure play on the U.S. dining scene, with most of its firepower in restaurant and food-service names rather than broad consumer stocks. Casey’s General Stores and US Foods are doing the heavy lifting, with steadily rising shares that help offset bumps elsewhere. Cheesecake Factory and Restaurant Brands are also adding some flavor, contributing solid, if not spectacular, gains. On the flip side, Brinker International has been mixed and Yum China is losing steam, modestly dragging on results. Overall, the fund is concentrated in restaurant operators, with limited geographic diversification beyond North America.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Brinker International8.86%$198.51K$6.26B-8.54%
70
Neutral
Casey's General6.31%$141.38K$29.19B76.58%
68
Neutral
US Foods Holding6.23%$139.52K$20.45B43.63%
74
Outperform
Krispy Kreme5.85%$130.97K$657.80M-11.16%
57
Neutral
Restaurant Brands International5.67%$126.88K$37.03B29.78%
75
Outperform
Yum! Brands4.88%$109.30K$44.39B8.91%
59
Neutral
Cheesecake Factory4.81%$107.73K$3.08B22.58%
66
Neutral
Darden Restaurants4.73%$106.03K$23.18B0.95%
76
Outperform
Nathan's Famous4.39%$98.32K$414.15M5.56%
61
Neutral
Yum China Holdings4.35%$97.38K$16.87B3.51%
78
Outperform

EATZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
26.79
Positive
100DMA
26.97
Positive
200DMA
27.13
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.18
Positive
RSI
53.15
Neutral
STOCH
17.41
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EATZ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.04, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.79, and equal to the 200-day MA of 27.13, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.18 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 53.15 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 17.41 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for EATZ.

EATZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$2.18M1.00%
60
Neutral
$94.36M0.85%
65
Neutral
$87.97M1.06%
72
Outperform
$54.07M0.32%
65
Neutral
$28.59M0.18%
70
Outperform
$1.86M0.99%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
27.20
0.43
1.61%
CEPI
REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
IEDI
iShares Evolved US Discretionary Spending ETF
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement