Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
EATZ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ)
Rating:57Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past few months, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Holdings Showing Strength
Several of the largest positions, such as Brinker International, Casey's General, US Foods, Dine Brands, and Darden Restaurants, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Focused Industry Exposure
The heavy weighting in restaurant-related consumer cyclical companies gives investors targeted exposure to a specific part of the consumer economy.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost funds.
Concentrated Sector Risk
With most assets in the consumer cyclical sector, the fund is vulnerable to downturns in restaurant and related consumer spending.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The portfolio is heavily focused on U.S. companies, offering little protection if the U.S. market or economy weakens.
EATZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM2.59M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio1.00%
Beta0.86
IssuerAdvisorShares
Inception DateApr 20, 2021
Dividend Yield0.49%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,985
30 Day Avg. Volume3,372
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
31.51Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusHold
Number of Analyst Covering19
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
EATZ Summary
The AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) is a fund that focuses on the restaurant industry, part of the consumer discretionary sector. It doesn’t track a set index, but instead holds a mix of U.S.-focused restaurant and dining-related companies, from fast food to casual and sit-down chains. Well-known names in the fund include Darden Restaurants (Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse) and Yum! Brands (KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut). Someone might invest for targeted growth in the dining and leisure theme and added diversification. A key risk is that restaurant stocks can be very sensitive to the economy and consumer spending, so prices can swing up and down.
How much will it cost me?The AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) has an expense ratio of 0.99%, which means you’ll pay $9.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, meaning professionals are selecting and managing the investments rather than following a preset index.
What would affect this ETF?The AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) could benefit from positive trends like increased consumer spending on dining out, innovations in food delivery services, and a strong U.S. economy supporting discretionary spending. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, inflation affecting food costs, and economic slowdowns that reduce consumer demand for dining and leisure activities. Regulatory changes or labor shortages in the restaurant industry could also impact its performance.
EATZ Top 10 Holdings
EATZ is a pure play on the restaurant world, with most of its firepower in U.S.-listed casual and quick-service names. US Foods, Darden, and Cheesecake Factory are doing the heavy lifting lately, with rising share prices that help propel the fund. Casey’s and Yum China are also adding steady support, showing that both convenience-focused and international dining trends are working. On the flip side, Brinker and Dine Brands are losing steam, acting as mild brakes on performance. Overall, it’s a concentrated bet on consumer dining rather than broad consumer spending.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casey's General | 8.11% | $211.60K | $24.38B | 61.20% | 68 Neutral | |
| Brinker International | 6.70% | $174.71K | $6.89B | -8.03% | 70 Neutral | |
| Nathan's Famous | 6.40% | $166.96K | $411.57M | 0.45% | 61 Neutral | |
| US Foods Holding | 5.84% | $152.37K | $21.30B | 35.55% | 74 Outperform | |
| Yum! Brands | 5.16% | $134.66K | $45.23B | 10.80% | 59 Neutral | |
| Darden Restaurants | 5.12% | $133.48K | $24.92B | 9.91% | 76 Outperform | |
| Yum China Holdings | 5.10% | $132.90K | $20.06B | 17.20% | 78 Outperform | |
| Cheesecake Factory | 5.07% | $132.25K | $3.19B | 16.12% | 66 Neutral | |
| Restaurant Brands International | 4.81% | $125.34K | $32.59B | 5.07% | 75 Outperform | |
| Dine Brands Global | 4.22% | $110.08K | $490.69M | 18.73% | 58 Neutral |
EATZ Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
27.24
Positive
26.69
Positive
27.74
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.01
Positive
48.48
Neutral
20.58
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EATZ, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.41, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.24, and equal to the 200-day MA of 27.74, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.01 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.48 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 20.58 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for EATZ.
EATZ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
27.26
-1.45
-5.05%
LFGY
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
―
―
―
LFSC
F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF
―
―
―
CEPI
REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
IEDI
iShares Evolved US Discretionary Spending ETF
―
―
―
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents