BEDZ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ)
Rating:65Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong short-term gains over the past month and solid results over the past three months, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Hotel and Lodging Holdings
Several of the largest holdings, including well-known hotel and lodging companies, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Focused Exposure to Travel and Lodging
The fund’s concentration in hotel, lodging, and related real estate names offers targeted exposure for investors who are optimistic about the travel and hospitality industry.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high management fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost funds.
Small Asset Base
The fund manages a very small amount of assets, which can increase the risk of closure and may lead to wider trading spreads for investors.
Concentrated Sector and U.S. Exposure
Heavy weighting in consumer cyclical and real estate sectors and a strong focus on U.S. companies leave the fund more vulnerable to downturns in the domestic travel and lodging market.
BEDZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM2.18M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.99%
Beta0.96
IssuerAdvisorShares
Inception DateApr 20, 2021
Dividend Yield2.1%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,536
30 Day Avg. Volume955
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
39.19Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering21
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
BEDZ Summary
The AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) focuses on the travel and leisure theme, investing mainly in U.S. companies tied to hotels, resorts, and related real estate rather than tracking a traditional index. It holds well-known names like Hilton Worldwide and Expedia, along with hotel-focused real estate companies. Someone might consider BEDZ if they believe travel and tourism will keep growing and want a simple way to invest in that trend through one fund. However, this ETF is concentrated in the hotel and travel industry, so its price can swing a lot with changes in travel demand and the overall economy.
How much will it cost me?The AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) has an expense ratio of 0.99%, meaning you’ll pay $9.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, which typically involves more research and trading compared to passively managed ETFs that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) could benefit from a continued rebound in global travel and leisure demand, driven by increased consumer spending and easing travel restrictions. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact consumer discretionary spending, and economic slowdowns that might reduce travel activity. Its focus on U.S.-based hospitality companies and exposure to cruise lines, hotels, and resorts makes it sensitive to both positive trends in tourism and potential disruptions like regulatory changes or geopolitical events.
BEDZ Top 10 Holdings
BEDZ is heavily tilted toward U.S. hotel and lodging names, with a big dose of hotel-focused REITs, so it’s essentially a pure play on the travel and hospitality comeback. Chatham Lodging, Apple Hospitality, Host Hotels, and Pebblebrook are doing much of the heavy lifting, with shares generally rising as travel demand stays firm. Monarch Casino & Resort adds a steady gaming twist, while Gaming and Leisure is more mixed. On the flip side, H World Group and Service Properties are lagging, acting like sandbags on an otherwise recovering portfolio.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chatham Lodging | 6.73% | $136.46K | $570.44M | 76.11% | 59 Neutral | |
| Sunstone Hotel | 6.28% | $127.38K | $2.13B | 29.01% | 57 Neutral | |
| Apple Hospitality REIT | 5.65% | $114.61K | $3.74B | 39.31% | 64 Neutral | |
| H World Group | 5.57% | $113.03K | $13.22B | 27.77% | 74 Outperform | |
| Monarch Casino & Resort | 5.16% | $104.78K | $2.26B | 49.74% | 78 Outperform | |
| Host Hotels & Resorts | 4.62% | $93.70K | $16.40B | 52.64% | 77 Outperform | |
| Hilton Grand Vacations | 4.57% | $92.63K | $3.95B | 29.98% | 60 Neutral | |
| Marriott International | 4.38% | $88.96K | $101.84B | 46.73% | 62 Neutral | |
| Diamondrock | 4.27% | $86.64K | $2.39B | 49.81% | 65 Neutral | |
| Carnival | 4.23% | $85.91K | $35.95B | 19.30% | 78 Outperform |
BEDZ Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
33.91
Positive
33.14
Positive
32.94
Positive
Market Momentum
0.69
Negative
70.11
Negative
89.62
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BEDZ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 34.81, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.91, and equal to the 200-day MA of 32.94, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.69 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 70.11 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 89.62 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for BEDZ.
BEDZ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
36.59
7.62
26.30%
SOXY
YieldMax Target 12 Semiconductor Option Income ETF
―
―
―
PSR
Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund
―
―
―
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
SRHR
SRH REIT Covered Call ETF
―
―
―
IEDI
iShares Evolved US Discretionary Spending ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents