tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

BEDZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ)

Rating:63Neutral
Price Target:
BEDZ, the AdvisorShares Hotel ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to strong contributors like Expedia and Host Hotels & Resorts, which show robust financial performance, attractive valuations, and positive growth strategies that support the fund’s quality. However, weaker names such as Chatham Lodging, with mixed financial results and bearish trading signals, and holdings with high leverage or premium valuations introduce risk. The main risk factor is the fund’s focus on hotel, lodging, and related leisure businesses, which ties its fortunes closely to travel demand and economic cycles.
Positive Factors
Targeted Exposure to Travel and Lodging
The fund focuses on hotels, online travel platforms, and related real estate, giving investors direct exposure to the travel and lodging theme.
Mix of Strong and Steady Top Holdings
Several major positions, such as Marriott, Host Hotels & Resorts, and Service Properties, have shown positive year-to-date performance, helping offset weaker names in the portfolio.
Blend of Consumer and Real Estate Sectors
Holdings spread across consumer cyclical and real estate companies provide exposure to both travel demand and property-based income streams within the same ETF.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into returns over time compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has delivered negative returns over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, signaling recent headwinds for its strategy.
Concentrated and U.S.-Heavy Portfolio
The ETF is heavily invested in U.S. companies and in a single industry group, increasing risk if the domestic hotel and travel market struggles.

BEDZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

BEDZ Summary

BEDZ is an ETF that focuses on the hotel and travel industry, mainly in the U.S. It doesn’t track a traditional index, but instead holds a mix of hotel, resort, and travel-related companies. Well-known names in the fund include Marriott International and Expedia, along with other hotel owners and booking platforms. Someone might invest in BEDZ if they believe travel and leisure will keep growing and want a simple way to spread their money across many companies in this space. A key risk is that it can rise or fall sharply with travel demand and the overall economy.
How much will it cost me?The AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) has an expense ratio of 0.99%, meaning you’ll pay $9.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, which typically involves more research and trading compared to passively managed ETFs that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) could benefit from a continued rebound in global travel and leisure demand, driven by increased consumer spending and easing travel restrictions. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact consumer discretionary spending, and economic slowdowns that might reduce travel activity. Its focus on U.S.-based hospitality companies and exposure to cruise lines, hotels, and resorts makes it sensitive to both positive trends in tourism and potential disruptions like regulatory changes or geopolitical events.

BEDZ Top 10 Holdings

BEDZ is essentially a bet on the travel comeback, with a heavy tilt toward U.S. hotel and leisure names. Expedia has been one of the brighter spots lately, helping to pull the fund forward, while Airbnb’s mixed trading and Viking’s recent slide act more like headwinds than tailwinds. Traditional hotel giants like Marriott and Hilton look steady but not spectacular, keeping the fund on a relatively even keel. REITs such as Host Hotels and Gaming and Leisure add income-focused ballast, but their recent softness has slightly dulled overall momentum.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Expedia7.07%$121.03K$28.07B63.81%
80
Outperform
Marriott International6.05%$103.52K$89.56B58.42%
62
Neutral
Host Hotels & Resorts5.98%$102.28K$13.23B48.84%
77
Outperform
Monarch Casino & Resort5.16%$88.25K$1.76B34.70%
78
Outperform
Chatham Lodging5.14%$88.01K$375.67M27.20%
59
Neutral
Hilton Worldwide Holdings4.98%$85.27K$70.37B50.33%
67
Neutral
Gaming and Leisure4.93%$84.39K$12.79B-2.86%
72
Outperform
Apple Hospitality REIT4.83%$82.72K$2.73B4.51%
64
Neutral
Viking Holdings4.76%$81.47K$32.74B115.11%
66
Neutral
H World Group4.55%$77.87K$15.54B68.27%
74
Outperform

BEDZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
32.31
Negative
100DMA
32.56
Negative
200DMA
32.48
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.37
Negative
RSI
47.17
Neutral
STOCH
62.86
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BEDZ, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 31.44, equal to the 50-day MA of 32.31, and equal to the 200-day MA of 32.48, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.37 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 47.17 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 62.86 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for BEDZ.

BEDZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.71M0.99%
63
Neutral
$93.12M0.54%
53
Neutral
$80.06M0.85%
66
Neutral
$60.39M1.06%
72
Outperform
$27.15M0.18%
70
Outperform
$1.81M1.00%
56
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
31.42
4.23
15.56%
LFSC
F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF
CEPI
REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
IEDI
iShares Evolved US Discretionary Spending ETF
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement