UMI - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The fund’s year-to-date and recent three-month returns have been strong, showing solid momentum in the current market.
High-Performing Core Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including major midstream energy companies, have delivered strong gains, supporting the ETF’s overall results.
North American Focus with Some Diversification
While most assets are in U.S. energy companies, meaningful exposure to Canadian firms adds a bit of geographic diversification within the midstream space.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration in Energy
With the vast majority of assets in the energy sector, the fund is highly sensitive to swings in energy prices and industry-specific risks.
Top Holdings Make Up Large Share
A relatively small group of midstream stocks accounts for a big portion of the portfolio, increasing the impact if any of these companies run into trouble.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of going to investors.
UMI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM507.14M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.69%
Beta0.28
IssuerUSCF Advisers
Inception DateMar 24, 2021
Dividend Yield5.11%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume20,386
30 Day Avg. Volume19,279
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
66.05Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering22
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
UMI Summary
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) is an energy-focused fund that invests mainly in midstream companies—businesses that run pipelines, storage tanks, and other infrastructure that move oil and natural gas. It does not track a traditional index, but follows the theme of energy midstream and Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs). Well-known holdings include Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners. Investors might consider UMI for its focus on income and diversification within the energy infrastructure space. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the energy sector, so its value can rise or fall sharply with energy prices and industry conditions.
How much will it cost me?The USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (Ticker: UMI) has an expense ratio of 0.69%, which means you’ll pay $6.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a niche area of the energy sector, requiring more specialized management. It’s designed to generate income through investments in Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs).
What would affect this ETF?The UMI ETF, focused on midstream energy infrastructure and MLPs, could benefit from increased energy demand and investment in North American energy infrastructure, as well as the steady income from MLP distributions. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, fluctuating energy prices, or reduced demand for fossil fuels due to the global shift toward renewable energy. The performance of top holdings like Enbridge and Energy Transfer will also play a significant role in its future prospects.
UMI Top 10 Holdings
UMI is built around a tight cluster of North American midstream energy names, with Targa Resources and Oneok acting as the fund’s main engines thanks to their rising momentum and upbeat growth stories. Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners provide a steadier, income-focused backbone, keeping returns more predictable. On the softer side, Williams and Kinder Morgan have been lagging recently, occasionally throwing sand in the gears. Overall, this is a sector-heavy bet on pipelines and energy infrastructure, with performance driven largely by a handful of big midstream operators.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Transfer | 7.98% | $40.32M | $69.51B | 12.20% | 70 Outperform | |
| Enterprise Products Partners | 7.62% | $38.51M | $83.66B | 23.01% | 73 Outperform | |
| Enbridge | 7.00% | $35.40M | $120.82B | 22.39% | 69 Neutral | |
| Williams Co | 6.83% | $34.52M | $85.77B | 18.28% | 76 Outperform | |
| Targa Resources | 6.69% | $33.84M | $56.81B | 61.25% | 74 Outperform | |
| Kinder Morgan | 5.99% | $30.30M | $70.92B | 12.83% | 68 Neutral | |
| DT Midstream | 5.69% | $28.76M | $13.87B | 33.14% | 78 Outperform | |
| Plains GP Holdings | 4.85% | $24.54M | $20.31B | 35.64% | 72 Outperform | |
| MPLX | 4.82% | $24.39M | $58.64B | 9.73% | 81 Outperform | |
| Keyera Corp. | 4.81% | $24.33M | C$17.71B | 38.94% | 64 Neutral |
UMI Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
59.74
Positive
58.66
Positive
54.02
Positive
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For UMI, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 60.63, equal to the 50-day MA of 59.74, and equal to the 200-day MA of 54.02, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for UMI.
UMI Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
60.78
13.39
28.25%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
―
―
―
MLPI
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
―
―
―
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
―
―
―
WEEI
Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF
―
―
―
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents