UMI - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI)

Rating:68Neutral

Price Target:―

UMI, the USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to several strong midstream energy holdings like MPLX and DTM, which show robust financial performance, positive earnings calls, and supportive technical trends, all while offering attractive dividend income. Other key positions such as Williams Co, Targa Resources, and Plains GP Holdings also add strength through profitability and strategic growth moves, though high leverage and some valuation concerns across names like Enbridge, Kinder Morgan, and TC Energy introduce risk. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in midstream energy companies, where shared issues like high debt levels, cash flow pressures, and occasional bearish or cautious technical signals can weigh on the ETF’s rating.

Positive Factors

Solid Recent Performance

The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.

Strong Core Midstream Holdings

Several of the largest midstream energy positions have delivered strong year-to-date results, helping support the fund’s overall performance.

Meaningful Asset Base

The fund manages a sizable pool of assets, which can support liquidity and trading for everyday investors.

Negative Factors

High Sector Concentration

With the vast majority of assets in the energy sector, the fund is heavily exposed to swings in energy prices and industry-specific risks.

Notable Single-Industry Focus

The portfolio is focused on midstream energy and related infrastructure, offering limited diversification across different parts of the economy.

Above-Average Expense Ratio

The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of staying with investors.

UMI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM465.51M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.69%

Beta0.49

IssuerUSCF Advisers

Inception DateMar 24, 2021

Dividend Yield5.63%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedNo Underlying Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume19,425

30 Day Avg. Volume25,574

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

57.83

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering23

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

UMI Summary

UMI is an ETF that focuses on midstream energy companies, mainly in the U.S. and Canada, that own and operate pipelines, storage tanks, and other energy infrastructure. It does not track a traditional index, but instead targets income from energy partnerships and related firms. Well-known holdings include Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan. Someone might invest in UMI for potential steady income and diversification within the energy sector, since these businesses often earn fees for moving and storing oil and gas. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in energy, so its price can rise or fall sharply with energy markets and regulations.

How much will it cost me?The USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (Ticker: UMI) has an expense ratio of 0.69%, which means you’ll pay $6.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a niche area of the energy sector, requiring more specialized management. It’s designed to generate income through investments in Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs).

What would affect this ETF?The UMI ETF, focused on midstream energy infrastructure and MLPs, could benefit from increased energy demand and investment in North American energy infrastructure, as well as the steady income from MLP distributions. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, fluctuating energy prices, or reduced demand for fossil fuels due to the global shift toward renewable energy. The performance of top holdings like Enbridge and Energy Transfer will also play a significant role in its future prospects.

UMI Top 10 Holdings

UMI is very much a midstream energy story, with a tight cluster of North American pipeline and infrastructure names steering returns. Energy Transfer, Enterprise Products Partners, and Kinder Morgan are the steady engines, rising on solid cash flows and dependable dividends. MPLX and Targa Resources add more punch, with stronger recent momentum that helps pull the fund forward. On the flip side, Enbridge and TC Energy are losing a bit of steam, their lagging share prices and leverage concerns acting as a mild brake on overall performance.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
EPD	Enterprise Products Partners	7.73%	$36.24M	$78.12B	9.03%	73 Outperform
ET	Energy Transfer	7.73%	$36.23M	$64.75B	-2.11%	70 Outperform
WMB	Williams Co	7.48%	$35.06M	$88.10B	27.05%	76 Outperform
ENB	Enbridge	6.93%	$32.47M	C$152.10B	23.31%	69 Neutral
KMI	Kinder Morgan	6.59%	$30.91M	$71.84B	23.93%	68 Neutral
DTM	DT Midstream	6.45%	$30.25M	$13.57B	38.10%	78 Outperform
MPLX	MPLX	6.25%	$29.29M	$57.67B	9.01%	81 Outperform
TRGP	Targa Resources	5.77%	$27.07M	$48.86B	15.47%	74 Outperform
PAGP	Plains GP Holdings	4.74%	$22.20M	$16.72B	2.72%	72 Outperform
TRP	TC Energy	4.65%	$21.82M	C$87.94B	38.68%	70 Outperform

UMI Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

50.99

Positive

100DMA

49.52

Positive

200DMA

48.74

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

1.66

Negative

RSI

82.32

Negative

STOCH

82.51

Negative

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For UMI, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 53.87, equal to the 50-day MA of 50.99, and equal to the 200-day MA of 48.74, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.66 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 82.32 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 82.51 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for UMI.

UMI Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
UMI	―	―	$465.51M	0.69%	―
EMLP	―	―	$3.82B	0.96%	―
MLPI	―	―	$269.76M	0.68%	―
MDST	―	―	$207.28M	0.80%	―
PIPE	―	―	$57.45M	0.75%	―
WEEI	―	―	$46.98M	0.85%	―

Performance Comparison

UMI

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF

56.78

8.78

18.29%

EMLP

First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund

―

MLPI

NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF

―

MDST

Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF

―

PIPE

Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

―

WEEI

Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents