tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

UMI - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

UMI

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
The USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) benefits from strong contributions by holdings like MPLX and DTM, which showcase robust financial performance, strategic growth initiatives, and attractive dividend yields. These strengths are slightly offset by weaker performers such as Keyera Corp., which faces challenges in revenue growth and cash flow, and Kinder Morgan, which shows bearish technical trends and potential overvaluation. A key risk factor for the ETF is its concentration in the energy sector, which may expose it to volatility from commodity price fluctuations and regulatory changes.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as Williams Co and Antero Midstream, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s returns.
High Energy Sector Focus
The ETF’s heavy exposure to the energy sector benefits from steady demand and growth in midstream energy infrastructure.
Diversified Geographic Exposure
The fund includes both U.S. and Canadian companies, providing some regional diversification within North America.
Negative Factors
Underperforming Holdings
Some top positions, like Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners, have lagged year-to-date, dragging overall performance.
Sector Concentration Risk
With over 95% exposure to the energy sector, the fund is highly vulnerable to downturns in energy markets.
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high expense ratio compared to many other funds, which can eat into investor returns over time.

UMI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

UMI Summary

The USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (Ticker: UMI) focuses on companies in the midstream energy sector, such as pipelines and storage facilities, which are essential for transporting and storing oil, natural gas, and refined products. It includes well-known companies like Enbridge and Energy Transfer and is designed to generate income through investments in Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs), which often offer attractive yields. This ETF might appeal to investors seeking steady income and exposure to the energy infrastructure market. However, it is heavily tied to the energy sector, meaning its performance can be impacted by fluctuations in energy prices and demand.
How much will it cost me?The USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (Ticker: UMI) has an expense ratio of 0.69%, which means you’ll pay $6.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a niche area of the energy sector, requiring more specialized management. It’s designed to generate income through investments in Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs).
What would affect this ETF?The UMI ETF, focused on midstream energy infrastructure and MLPs, could benefit from increased energy demand and investment in North American energy infrastructure, as well as the steady income from MLP distributions. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, fluctuating energy prices, or reduced demand for fossil fuels due to the global shift toward renewable energy. The performance of top holdings like Enbridge and Energy Transfer will also play a significant role in its future prospects.

UMI Top 10 Holdings

The USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) is firmly rooted in the energy sector, with a heavy focus on Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) that drive midstream infrastructure like pipelines and storage. Recent performance has been mixed, with DT Midstream and MPLX showing rising momentum thanks to strong earnings and bullish trends, while Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan are lagging due to bearish technical indicators and growth challenges. The fund’s North American concentration offers steady exposure to essential energy infrastructure, but its reliance on a few key names means performance hinges on sector-wide stability.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Enbridge8.50%$33.40M$102.08B12.03%
69
Neutral
Energy Transfer8.28%$32.52M$56.27B-14.39%
70
Outperform
Enterprise Products Partners7.67%$30.11M$69.10B3.32%
73
Outperform
Williams Co7.35%$28.88M$71.15B9.01%
76
Outperform
DT Midstream6.46%$25.39M$12.00B17.66%
78
Outperform
MPLX6.36%$25.00M$54.62B12.19%
81
Outperform
Kinder Morgan6.18%$24.26M$58.93B-0.59%
68
Neutral
Targa Resources4.72%$18.56M$38.41B2.40%
74
Outperform
TC Energy4.67%$18.33MC$78.01B18.84%
70
Outperform
South Bow Corp4.37%$17.16MC$7.86B11.20%

UMI Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
48.12
Positive
100DMA
48.39
Positive
200DMA
47.96
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.09
Positive
RSI
55.81
Neutral
STOCH
1.84
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For UMI, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 49.04, equal to the 50-day MA of 48.12, and equal to the 200-day MA of 47.96, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.09 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 55.81 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 1.84 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for UMI.

UMI Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$394.00M0.69%
$3.35B0.96%
$915.49M0.75%
$168.43M0.80%
$49.94M0.75%
$32.52M0.85%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
49.24
2.42
5.17%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
PWRD
Tcw Transform Systems Etf
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
WEEI
Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement