Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
UMI - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Strong Core Midstream Holdings
Several of the largest midstream energy positions have delivered strong year-to-date results, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Meaningful Asset Base
The fund manages a sizable pool of assets, which can support liquidity and trading for everyday investors.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in the energy sector, the fund is heavily exposed to swings in energy prices and industry-specific risks.
Notable Single-Industry Focus
The portfolio is focused on midstream energy and related infrastructure, offering limited diversification across different parts of the economy.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of staying with investors.
UMI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM430.84M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.69%
Beta0.49
IssuerUSCF Advisers
Inception DateMar 24, 2021
Dividend Yield6.1%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume48,775
30 Day Avg. Volume24,297
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
56.20Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering23
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
UMI Summary
UMI is an ETF that focuses on midstream energy companies, mainly in the U.S. and Canada, that own and operate pipelines, storage tanks, and other energy infrastructure. It does not track a traditional index, but instead targets income from energy partnerships and related firms. Well-known holdings include Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan. Someone might invest in UMI for potential steady income and diversification within the energy sector, since these businesses often earn fees for moving and storing oil and gas. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in energy, so its price can rise or fall sharply with energy markets and regulations.
How much will it cost me?The USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (Ticker: UMI) has an expense ratio of 0.69%, which means you’ll pay $6.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a niche area of the energy sector, requiring more specialized management. It’s designed to generate income through investments in Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs).
What would affect this ETF?The UMI ETF, focused on midstream energy infrastructure and MLPs, could benefit from increased energy demand and investment in North American energy infrastructure, as well as the steady income from MLP distributions. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, fluctuating energy prices, or reduced demand for fossil fuels due to the global shift toward renewable energy. The performance of top holdings like Enbridge and Energy Transfer will also play a significant role in its future prospects.
UMI Top 10 Holdings
UMI is very much a midstream energy story, with a tight cluster of North American pipeline and infrastructure names steering returns. Energy Transfer, Enterprise Products Partners, and Kinder Morgan are the steady engines, rising on solid cash flows and dependable dividends. MPLX and Targa Resources add more punch, with stronger recent momentum that helps pull the fund forward. On the flip side, Enbridge and TC Energy are losing a bit of steam, their lagging share prices and leverage concerns acting as a mild brake on overall performance.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Transfer | 8.14% | $34.92M | $63.35B | -9.91% | 70 Outperform | |
| Enterprise Products Partners | 7.65% | $32.81M | $71.80B | 1.65% | 73 Outperform | |
| Williams Co | 7.47% | $32.04M | $82.14B | 21.34% | 76 Outperform | |
| Enbridge | 7.11% | $30.52M | $106.43B | 12.95% | 69 Neutral | |
| Kinder Morgan | 6.65% | $28.55M | $67.83B | 10.95% | 68 Neutral | |
| MPLX | 6.50% | $27.90M | $56.85B | 7.48% | 81 Outperform | |
| DT Midstream | 6.47% | $27.78M | $12.81B | 24.67% | 78 Outperform | |
| Targa Resources | 5.43% | $23.32M | $43.14B | 2.12% | 74 Outperform | |
| TC Energy | 4.74% | $20.34M | C$83.08B | 30.23% | 70 Outperform | |
| Plains GP Holdings | 4.72% | $20.25M | $15.60B | -3.17% | 72 Outperform |
UMI Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
49.42
Positive
48.75
Positive
48.19
Positive
Market Momentum
0.91
Negative
65.90
Neutral
82.95
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For UMI, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 50.21, equal to the 50-day MA of 49.42, and equal to the 200-day MA of 48.19, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.91 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 65.90 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 82.95 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for UMI.
UMI Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
51.96
3.19
6.54%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
―
―
―
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
―
―
―
MLPI
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
―
―
―
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
WEEI
Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents