UMI - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The fund has delivered solid gains so far this year, showing positive momentum for investors.
Leading Midstream Energy Holdings
Many of the largest positions in the portfolio are well-known midstream energy companies that have shown strong or steady performance this year.
Meaningful U.S. and Canadian Exposure
Holdings spread across both U.S. and Canadian companies provide some geographic diversification within North American energy markets.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration in Energy
With the vast majority of assets in the energy sector, the fund is heavily exposed to swings in energy prices and industry-specific risks.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s ongoing fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can gradually reduce net returns over time.
Short-Term Performance Volatility
The recent one-month decline shows that the fund’s price can move around noticeably in the short term, which may be uncomfortable for more cautious investors.
UMI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM483.21M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.69%
Beta0.35
IssuerUSCF Advisers
Inception DateMar 24, 2021
Dividend Yield6%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume27,573
30 Day Avg. Volume45,730
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
63.66Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering22
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
UMI Summary
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) focuses on energy infrastructure companies, mainly in the U.S. and Canada, that run pipelines and storage for oil and natural gas. It does not track a traditional index, but targets midstream energy partnerships and corporations. Well-known holdings include Kinder Morgan and Enbridge. Investors might consider UMI if they want potential income from energy-related businesses that earn fees for moving and storing fuel, rather than finding or drilling it. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in the energy sector, so its value can rise or fall sharply with energy prices and industry conditions.
How much will it cost me?The USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (Ticker: UMI) has an expense ratio of 0.69%, which means you’ll pay $6.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a niche area of the energy sector, requiring more specialized management. It’s designed to generate income through investments in Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs).
What would affect this ETF?The UMI ETF, focused on midstream energy infrastructure and MLPs, could benefit from increased energy demand and investment in North American energy infrastructure, as well as the steady income from MLP distributions. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, fluctuating energy prices, or reduced demand for fossil fuels due to the global shift toward renewable energy. The performance of top holdings like Enbridge and Energy Transfer will also play a significant role in its future prospects.
UMI Top 10 Holdings
UMI is very much a midstream energy story, with a tight cluster of North American pipeline and infrastructure names steering the ship. Targa Resources and DT Midstream are the fund’s sprinters, with rising share prices and upbeat growth narratives giving the ETF a solid tailwind. Williams, Enbridge, and Oneok are also climbing, helped by steady cash flows and generous dividends. MPLX, on the other hand, has been more of a steady plodder lately, contributing income but not much spark, underscoring how concentrated this fund is in a single, income-heavy energy theme.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Transfer | 8.09% | $38.37M | $69.06B | 9.19% | 70 Outperform | |
| Enterprise Products Partners | 7.83% | $37.13M | $85.74B | 21.90% | 73 Outperform | |
| Williams Co | 7.39% | $35.04M | $95.97B | 27.02% | 76 Outperform | |
| Enbridge | 7.11% | $33.72M | $126.06B | 23.83% | 69 Neutral | |
| Targa Resources | 6.54% | $30.99M | $59.40B | 67.16% | 74 Outperform | |
| Kinder Morgan | 6.31% | $29.90M | $75.18B | 16.60% | 68 Neutral | |
| DT Midstream | 6.20% | $29.38M | $15.42B | 41.67% | 78 Outperform | |
| MPLX | 5.30% | $25.14M | $57.30B | 10.38% | 81 Outperform | |
| Oneok | 4.94% | $23.44M | $59.24B | 10.64% | 82 Outperform | |
| TC Energy | 4.77% | $22.62M | C$101.07B | 38.81% | 70 Outperform |
UMI Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
58.13
Positive
55.59
Positive
51.50
Positive
Market Momentum
0.71
Positive
46.96
Neutral
12.36
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For UMI, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 59.63, equal to the 50-day MA of 58.13, and equal to the 200-day MA of 51.50, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.71 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 46.96 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 12.36 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for UMI.
UMI Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
58.65
12.14
26.10%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
―
―
―
MLPI
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
―
―
―
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
―
―
―
WEEI
Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF
―
―
―
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents