Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
MLPI - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Income-Focused Energy Infrastructure
The fund targets MLPs and energy infrastructure companies, which are often used by investors seeking steady income from the energy sector.
Broad Energy Exposure Across Key Players
The ETF holds a mix of large, well-known pipeline and infrastructure companies, spreading risk across several major names rather than relying on just one.
North American Diversification
Holdings are split between U.S. and Canadian energy companies, giving investors exposure to two major energy markets instead of just one country.
Negative Factors
Heavy Concentration in Energy Sector
Almost all assets are in energy-related companies, so the fund is highly sensitive to swings in the energy market.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some of the largest positions have shown weak or negative recent performance, which can drag on overall fund returns.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can slowly reduce investors’ net returns over time.
MLPI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM192.39M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.68%
Beta-1.12
IssuerNeos
Inception DateDec 18, 2025
Dividend Yield2.43%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume234,356
30 Day Avg. Volume191,243
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
56.06Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering26
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
MLPI Summary
The NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) focuses on North American energy infrastructure, mainly Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) and related energy companies, rather than tracking a traditional index. It holds well-known pipeline and energy infrastructure firms like Kinder Morgan and Enbridge, which earn money by moving and storing oil and gas. Investors might consider MLPI for its focus on steady income and diversification within the energy sector. However, this ETF is heavily tied to the energy industry, so its value and income can go up and down with energy prices and sector conditions.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.68%, which means you’ll pay about $6.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed and uses options strategies to try to generate higher income.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF could benefit if North American energy demand stays strong, pipeline and infrastructure projects expand, and its call-writing strategy continues to generate steady income from holdings like Williams, Enbridge, and Kinder Morgan. On the other hand, it could be hurt by weaker oil and gas prices, stricter environmental rules, or higher interest rates that make its income less attractive compared with safer bonds, as well as any company-specific problems at its major pipeline and midstream holdings.
MLPI Top 10 Holdings
MLPI is essentially a bet on North American energy pipelines and infrastructure, with Williams, Enbridge, and TC Energy setting the tone. Williams and Enbridge have been more mixed lately, acting like steady but unspectacular anchors rather than clear leaders. The real spark comes from names like Energy Transfer, Oneok, and Targa Resources, which have been rising and giving the fund some welcome momentum. Cheniere adds a more volatile, export-focused twist. Overall, this is a highly concentrated energy play, tilted toward U.S. and Canadian midstream giants.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Co | 10.08% | $19.46M | $84.07B | 23.77% | 76 Outperform | |
| Enbridge | 9.64% | $18.62M | $111.32B | 12.26% | 69 Neutral | |
| TC Energy | 7.49% | $14.47M | C$84.38B | 28.69% | 70 Outperform | |
| Kinder Morgan | 6.81% | $13.14M | $68.99B | 17.92% | 68 Neutral | |
| Oneok | 5.71% | $11.03M | $52.52B | -14.84% | 82 Outperform | |
| Cheniere Energy | 5.00% | $9.65M | $47.00B | 3.02% | 71 Outperform | |
| Targa Resources | 4.99% | $9.63M | $46.59B | 8.53% | 74 Outperform | |
| Pembina Pipeline | 4.63% | $8.94M | $25.05B | 18.36% | 70 Outperform | |
| Energy Transfer | 4.38% | $8.46M | $62.18B | -8.88% | 70 Outperform | |
| Enterprise Products Partners | 4.28% | $8.26M | $76.13B | 6.77% | 73 Outperform |
MLPI Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
Market Momentum
1.18
Negative
82.78
Negative
95.50
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MLPI, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 51.41, equal to the 50-day MA of ―, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 1.18 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 82.78 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 95.50 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MLPI.
MLPI Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MLPI
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
53.99
5.40
11.11%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
―
―
―
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
―
―
―
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
―
―
―
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
WEEI
Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents