MLPI - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI)
Rating:65Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, helped by a generally strong energy infrastructure market.
Leading Energy Infrastructure Holdings
Many of the largest positions, such as major pipeline and midstream companies, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s returns.
Growing Asset Base
The fund has built a sizable level of assets under management, suggesting steady investor interest and better trading liquidity.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in the energy sector, the ETF is heavily exposed to swings in energy prices and industry-specific risks.
Limited Geographic Diversification
Most holdings are in North America, which reduces the benefits of global diversification and ties performance closely to U.S. and Canadian markets.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can gradually reduce net returns for long-term investors.
MLPI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM537.67M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.68%
Beta-0.58
IssuerNeos
Inception DateDec 18, 2025
Dividend Yield6.09%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume377,154
30 Day Avg. Volume326,024
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
59.19Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering26
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
MLPI Summary
The NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) focuses on energy infrastructure in North America, mainly companies that own and operate pipelines and related assets. It doesn’t track a set index, but is actively managed and aims to provide high monthly income, partly by using options. Well-known holdings include Enbridge and Kinder Morgan, which move and store oil and natural gas. Someone might invest for steady income and diversification within the energy sector. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the energy market, so its value can rise or fall with energy prices and demand.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.68%, which means you’ll pay about $6.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed and uses options strategies to try to generate higher income.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF could benefit if North American energy demand stays strong, pipeline and infrastructure projects expand, and its call-writing strategy continues to generate steady income from holdings like Williams, Enbridge, and Kinder Morgan. On the other hand, it could be hurt by weaker oil and gas prices, stricter environmental rules, or higher interest rates that make its income less attractive compared with safer bonds, as well as any company-specific problems at its major pipeline and midstream holdings.
MLPI Top 10 Holdings
MLPI is essentially a North American energy highway play, with big positions in midstream names like Williams, Kinder Morgan, and Oneok quietly powering the fund as they keep trending higher over the past few months. Targa Resources and Cheniere Energy have been the real spark plugs lately, adding extra juice with stronger, more upbeat momentum. On the flip side, Canadian giants Enbridge and TC Energy have been a bit sluggish recently, softening returns. Overall, the ETF is heavily concentrated in energy infrastructure, with very little exposure outside the sector or region.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Co | 9.48% | $50.49M | $87.62B | 20.20% | 76 Outperform | |
| Enbridge | 9.38% | $49.96M | $114.53B | 13.24% | 69 Neutral | |
| TC Energy | 6.14% | $32.72M | C$86.87B | 22.97% | 70 Outperform | |
| Kinder Morgan | 5.87% | $31.28M | $70.59B | 18.09% | 68 Neutral | |
| Pembina Pipeline | 5.58% | $29.71M | $25.11B | 12.59% | 70 Outperform | |
| Cheniere Energy | 4.95% | $26.37M | $54.05B | 10.73% | 71 Outperform | |
| Targa Resources | 4.72% | $25.14M | $51.53B | 35.54% | 74 Outperform | |
| Oneok | 4.60% | $24.48M | $54.94B | 1.08% | 82 Outperform | |
| Energy Transfer | 4.39% | $23.39M | $65.88B | 8.87% | 70 Outperform | |
| Enterprise Products Partners | 4.36% | $23.24M | $81.80B | 20.89% | 73 Outperform |
MLPI Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
54.73
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.09
Positive
50.60
Neutral
38.70
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MLPI, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 55.07, equal to the 50-day MA of 54.73, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.09 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 50.60 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 38.70 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MLPI.
MLPI Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MLPI
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
54.78
7.95
16.98%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
―
―
―
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
―
―
―
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
―
―
―
WEEI
Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF
―
―
―
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents