tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

MLPI - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

MLPI

NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
MLPI, the NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong, income-focused energy infrastructure names like Oneok and Williams, which combine healthy financial performance, growth initiatives, and attractive dividends. Other major holdings such as Enbridge, TC Energy, and Enterprise Products Partners further support the fund with resilient operations and shareholder-friendly policies, though common issues like high leverage, revenue or cash flow pressures, and some bearish or mixed technical signals introduce risk. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in leveraged energy infrastructure companies, where sector-specific headwinds or funding challenges could weigh on future performance.
Positive Factors
Income-Focused Energy Infrastructure
The fund targets MLPs and energy infrastructure companies, which are often used by investors seeking steady income from the energy sector.
Broad Energy Exposure Across Key Players
The ETF holds a mix of large, well-known pipeline and infrastructure companies, spreading risk across several major names rather than relying on just one.
North American Diversification
Holdings are split between U.S. and Canadian energy companies, giving investors exposure to two major energy markets instead of just one country.
Negative Factors
Heavy Concentration in Energy Sector
Almost all assets are in energy-related companies, so the fund is highly sensitive to swings in the energy market.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some of the largest positions have shown weak or negative recent performance, which can drag on overall fund returns.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can slowly reduce investors’ net returns over time.

MLPI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

MLPI Summary

The NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) focuses on North American energy infrastructure, mainly Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) and related energy companies, rather than tracking a traditional index. It holds well-known pipeline and energy infrastructure firms like Kinder Morgan and Enbridge, which earn money by moving and storing oil and gas. Investors might consider MLPI for its focus on steady income and diversification within the energy sector. However, this ETF is heavily tied to the energy industry, so its value and income can go up and down with energy prices and sector conditions.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.68%, which means you’ll pay about $6.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed and uses options strategies to try to generate higher income.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF could benefit if North American energy demand stays strong, pipeline and infrastructure projects expand, and its call-writing strategy continues to generate steady income from holdings like Williams, Enbridge, and Kinder Morgan. On the other hand, it could be hurt by weaker oil and gas prices, stricter environmental rules, or higher interest rates that make its income less attractive compared with safer bonds, as well as any company-specific problems at its major pipeline and midstream holdings.

MLPI Top 10 Holdings

MLPI is essentially a North American energy toll-road play, with big positions in Williams, Enbridge, TC Energy, and Kinder Morgan steering the fund. These pipeline and infrastructure names have been steadily rising, helped by solid earnings and dependable dividends, giving the ETF a sturdy backbone. Cheniere Energy and Targa Resources are more like the fund’s growth engines, recently running hotter and adding extra spark to returns. With almost everything tied to energy infrastructure and MLPs, sector concentration is high, but geographic exposure stays firmly rooted in North America.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Enbridge9.86%$44.64M$117.06B18.85%
69
Neutral
Williams Co9.39%$42.51M$87.74B16.61%
76
Outperform
TC Energy6.20%$28.04MC$89.99B27.71%
70
Outperform
Kinder Morgan5.98%$27.07M$73.15B13.69%
68
Neutral
Pembina Pipeline5.68%$25.72M$25.42B7.02%
70
Outperform
Cheniere Energy5.33%$24.14M$57.98B17.57%
71
Outperform
Targa Resources4.75%$21.52M$52.62B18.99%
74
Outperform
Oneok4.75%$21.51M$55.02B-12.96%
82
Outperform
Enterprise Products Partners4.30%$19.46M$80.91B9.93%
73
Outperform
Energy Transfer4.26%$19.27M$65.43B0.48%
70
Outperform

MLPI Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
54.01
Positive
100DMA
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
0.77
Positive
RSI
52.44
Neutral
STOCH
50.60
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MLPI, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 55.90, equal to the 50-day MA of 54.01, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.77 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 52.44 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 50.60 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for MLPI.

MLPI Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$485.30M0.68%
68
Neutral
$4.01B0.95%
65
Neutral
$515.63M0.69%
68
Neutral
$231.51M0.80%
71
Outperform
$65.81M0.85%
78
Outperform
$62.75M0.75%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
MLPI
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
55.69
8.28
17.46%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
WEEI
Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement