MLPI - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating solid momentum in its strategy.
High-Quality Energy Infrastructure Holdings
The top holdings are well-known energy infrastructure companies that have delivered strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Growing Asset Base
The fund manages a sizable amount of assets, which suggests healthy investor interest and can help with trading liquidity.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration in Energy
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are in the energy sector, which increases risk if that industry faces a downturn.
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns go toward costs instead of to investors.
Limited Diversification Outside North America
With nearly all exposure in the U.S. and Canada, the ETF offers little geographic diversification beyond North American markets.
MLPI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM902.94M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.68%
Beta-0.70
IssuerNeos
Inception DateDec 18, 2025
Dividend Yield11.17%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume393,681
30 Day Avg. Volume366,994
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
60.02Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering26
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
MLPI Summary
MLPI is the NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF, focused on energy infrastructure and Master Limited Partnerships in North America rather than tracking a traditional index. It mainly holds companies that own pipelines and other assets that move oil and natural gas, such as Kinder Morgan and Enbridge. Investors might consider MLPI for diversification into the energy sector and the potential for high monthly income from its call-writing strategy. However, because it is heavily concentrated in energy companies, its value can go up and down with changes in energy prices and the broader market.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.68%, which means you’ll pay about $6.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed and uses options strategies to try to generate higher income.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF could benefit if North American energy demand stays strong, pipeline and infrastructure projects expand, and its call-writing strategy continues to generate steady income from holdings like Williams, Enbridge, and Kinder Morgan. On the other hand, it could be hurt by weaker oil and gas prices, stricter environmental rules, or higher interest rates that make its income less attractive compared with safer bonds, as well as any company-specific problems at its major pipeline and midstream holdings.
MLPI Top 10 Holdings
MLPI is essentially a North American energy toll-road play, with midstream giants like Targa Resources and Cheniere Energy doing the heavy lifting as their rising share prices and growth stories power the fund. Energy Transfer and Oneok are also adding steady fuel, helped by solid operations and income appeal. On the flip side, big pipeline names such as Enbridge, TC Energy, and Williams have been lagging lately, acting as a bit of a brake. Overall, the ETF is highly concentrated in energy infrastructure, with minimal exposure beyond the sector or region.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Co | 9.47% | $84.66M | $87.68B | 23.51% | 76 Outperform | |
| Enbridge | 8.83% | $78.90M | $111.75B | 5.19% | 69 Neutral | |
| TC Energy | 6.97% | $62.29M | C$87.01B | 21.04% | 70 Outperform | |
| Kinder Morgan | 6.33% | $56.63M | $70.39B | 16.03% | 68 Neutral | |
| Targa Resources | 6.15% | $54.98M | $64.81B | 83.20% | 74 Outperform | |
| Oneok | 5.83% | $52.15M | $59.63B | 24.71% | 82 Outperform | |
| Cheniere Energy | 5.28% | $47.20M | $57.66B | 16.82% | 71 Outperform | |
| Energy Transfer | 4.82% | $43.09M | $73.03B | 21.02% | 70 Outperform | |
| Pembina Pipeline | 4.55% | $40.69M | $28.67B | 27.97% | 70 Outperform | |
| Enterprise Products Partners | 4.49% | $40.17M | $82.99B | 19.15% | 73 Outperform |
MLPI Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
53.99
Negative
53.74
Positive
Market Momentum
0.06
Negative
49.38
Neutral
34.37
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MLPI, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 53.60, equal to the 50-day MA of 53.99, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.06 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 49.38 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 34.37 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for MLPI.
MLPI Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MLPI
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
53.86
9.22
20.65%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
―
―
―
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
―
―
―
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
―
―
―
WEEI
Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF
―
―
―
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents