Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
EMLP - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Strong Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions, including major energy and utility names, have delivered positive year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Focused but Mixed Sector Exposure
The fund combines large allocations to both energy and utilities, giving investors exposure to two related but distinct parts of the infrastructure space.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Sector Concentration Risk
With most assets in energy and utilities, the ETF is heavily exposed to downturns or regulatory changes affecting these sectors.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The portfolio is overwhelmingly invested in U.S. companies with only a small slice in Canada, offering little protection if North American energy infrastructure faces challenges.
EMLP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM3.78B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.96%
Beta0.41
IssuerFirst Trust
Inception DateJun 21, 2012
Dividend Yield2.88%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume250,800
30 Day Avg. Volume238,855
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
42.74Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering62
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
EMLP Summary
EMLP is an ETF that focuses on North American energy infrastructure rather than tracking a broad market index. It mainly holds companies that move, store, and process oil, gas, and other energy products, plus some utility companies. Well-known holdings include Kinder Morgan and Duke Energy. Someone might invest in EMLP for potential income from dividends and to get targeted exposure to the energy and utilities sectors in one fund. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the energy industry, so its value can rise or fall sharply with energy prices and sector conditions.
How much will it cost me?The ETF EMLP has an expense ratio of 0.96%, which means you’ll pay $9.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on specialized energy infrastructure investments that require more research and management compared to passively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?EMLP could benefit from increased energy demand and investments in North American energy infrastructure, especially as the region transitions to sustainable energy solutions. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating energy prices, regulatory changes affecting MLPs, or economic slowdowns impacting infrastructure projects. Its focus on energy and utilities makes it sensitive to interest rate changes, which could impact dividend yields and borrowing costs for its top holdings.
EMLP Top 10 Holdings
EMLP is powered by a tight group of North American energy infrastructure names, with pipeline giants like Energy Transfer, MPLX, Plains GP, and Enterprise Products Partners doing most of the heavy lifting as their shares have been steadily rising on solid cash flows and income appeal. Kinder Morgan is more of a mixed story, with decent fundamentals but choppier momentum. On the utility side, stocks like Southern, Duke, and Entergy have been lagging or moving sideways, acting as ballast rather than engines. Overall, the fund is firmly anchored in North American energy and utilities, with a clear tilt toward midstream pipelines.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Products Partners | 8.07% | $306.78M | $76.69B | 6.74% | 73 Outperform | |
| Energy Transfer | 7.08% | $269.20M | $62.52B | -8.12% | 70 Outperform | |
| MPLX | 4.74% | $180.30M | $56.65B | 3.70% | 81 Outperform | |
| Kinder Morgan | 4.22% | $160.53M | $69.97B | 18.41% | 68 Neutral | |
| Plains GP Holdings | 3.63% | $138.00M | $16.14B | 1.29% | 72 Outperform | |
| National Fuel Gas Company | 3.55% | $134.81M | $8.08B | 17.80% | 77 Outperform | |
| Southern Co | 2.90% | $110.26M | $100.05B | 4.70% | 68 Neutral | |
| PPL | 2.63% | $100.00M | $26.63B | 4.62% | 66 Neutral | |
| ― | 2.41% | $91.66M | ― | ― | ― | |
| Duke Energy | 2.25% | $85.47M | $97.36B | 9.87% | 70 Outperform |
EMLP Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
38.79
Positive
38.31
Positive
37.49
Positive
Market Momentum
0.75
Negative
81.79
Negative
94.44
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EMLP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 40.01, equal to the 50-day MA of 38.79, and equal to the 200-day MA of 37.49, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.75 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 81.79 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 94.44 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for EMLP.
EMLP Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
41.77
5.65
15.64%
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
―
―
―
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
―
―
―
MLPI
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
―
―
―
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
WEEI
Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents