Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
SMLV - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV)
Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several top holdings, such as Argan and Trimas, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF’s overall returns.
Low Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a very low expense ratio, making it cost-effective for investors compared to similar funds.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, including financials, industrials, and technology, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
The ETF is heavily focused on U.S. companies, offering little exposure to international markets and limiting global diversification.
Mixed Performance in Top Holdings
Some top holdings, like Phillips Edison & Company and American States Water, have underperformed year-to-date, dragging on overall returns.
Sector Overweight in Financials
Nearly 30% of the ETF is allocated to financials, increasing vulnerability to sector-specific risks.
SMLV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM206.10M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.12%
Beta0.74
IssuerSPDR
Inception DateFeb 20, 2013
Dividend Yield2.68%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedState Street US Large Cap Low Volatility Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,980
30 Day Avg. Volume2,978
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
149.87Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering398
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
SMLV Summary
The SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is designed to give investors access to U.S. small-cap companies while aiming to reduce the ups and downs often seen in the stock market. It follows the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, which focuses on companies with historically lower price swings. Some of its holdings include Phillips Edison & Company and Sensient Technologies. This ETF could be a good choice for investors looking for growth opportunities in smaller companies while keeping risk in check. However, since it focuses on small-cap stocks, it may be more sensitive to economic changes compared to larger, more established companies.
How much will it cost me?The SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has an expense ratio of 0.12%, meaning you’ll pay $1.20 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for ETFs because it is passively managed, aiming to track an index rather than actively selecting stocks.
What would affect this ETF?The SMLV ETF, focused on U.S. small-cap companies with lower volatility, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and healthcare, which are key components of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact small-cap companies more significantly, and sector-specific risks such as regulatory changes in financials or real estate. Its concentration in the U.S. market also makes it sensitive to domestic economic conditions.
SMLV Top 10 Holdings
The SMLV ETF leans heavily into U.S. small-cap stocks with a focus on stability, but its performance is a mixed bag. Financials dominate the portfolio, with names like Safety Insurance Group showing resilience thanks to strong fundamentals and attractive dividends, while City Holding Company is lagging due to bearish momentum. Industrials and utilities, represented by Black Hills and Horace Mann Educators, are steady contributors, benefiting from strategic growth initiatives and solid execution. However, Sensient Technologies in the consumer sector is losing steam, weighed down by bearish trends. Overall, the fund’s sector concentration in financials and industrials provides stability, but a few underperformers are holding back broader gains.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northwestern | 0.72% | $1.50M | $4.17B | 33.20% | 74 Outperform | |
| TXNM Energy | 0.72% | $1.50M | $6.37B | 19.56% | 60 Neutral | |
| Argan | 0.69% | $1.43M | $4.59B | 123.78% | 73 Outperform | |
| Phillips Edison & Company | 0.67% | $1.40M | $4.81B | -11.33% | 71 Outperform | |
| TTM Technologies | 0.66% | $1.38M | $8.29B | 185.28% | 77 Outperform | |
| Sensient Technologies | 0.64% | $1.33M | $4.07B | 21.50% | 63 Neutral | |
| Black Hills | 0.63% | $1.31M | $5.43B | 19.14% | 74 Outperform | |
| Tower | 0.63% | $1.30M | $14.41B | 138.05% | 76 Outperform | |
| City Holding Company | 0.61% | $1.28M | $1.80B | -3.01% | 78 Outperform | |
| Safety Insurance Group | 0.61% | $1.27M | $1.17B | -6.19% | 75 Outperform |
SMLV Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
128.77
Positive
128.75
Positive
125.09
Positive
Market Momentum
1.81
Negative
70.11
Negative
92.54
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SMLV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 130.11, equal to the 50-day MA of 128.77, and equal to the 200-day MA of 125.09, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.81 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 70.11 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 92.54 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SMLV.
SMLV Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
135.47
2.82
2.13%
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
―
―
―
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
―
―
―
GSSC
Goldman Sachs Activebeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents