GSSC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Goldman Sachs Activebeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC)
Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Strong-Performing Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Bloom Energy, Rambus, and TTM Technologies, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including health care, financials, industrials, and technology, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Single-Country Concentration
The fund is heavily focused on U.S. stocks, with only a very small allocation outside the United States, which limits geographic diversification.
Small-Cap Volatility Risk
Because the ETF invests in small-cap companies, it may experience larger price swings and higher risk than funds focused on bigger, more established firms.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While many top holdings are performing well, at least one key position like Enova International has been weak year-to-date, which can drag on overall returns.
GSSC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM860.35M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.20%
Beta1.01
IssuerGoldman Sachs
Inception DateJun 28, 2017
Dividend Yield1.21%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume29,287
30 Day Avg. Volume57,646
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
97.65Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering1327
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GSSC Summary
GSSC is the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF, which follows the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity index. It focuses on smaller U.S. companies across many sectors, including health care, financials, and technology. Examples of holdings include Bloom Energy and Rambus. Investors might consider GSSC if they want growth potential from small companies and broader diversification beyond large, well-known stocks. However, small-cap stocks can be more volatile, so the value of this ETF can move up and down more sharply than funds focused on larger, more established companies.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) is 0.20%, which means you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for actively managed ETFs, as they typically involve more research and strategy compared to passively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and health care, which are significant parts of its portfolio. However, small-cap companies are often more sensitive to rising interest rates, economic slowdowns, or regulatory changes, which could negatively impact their performance. Additionally, its U.S.-focused exposure means the ETF's performance is closely tied to domestic economic conditions.
GSSC Top 10 Holdings
GSSC’s story is all about U.S. small caps, with a tilt toward financials, health care, industrials, and tech rather than any single star name. Bloom Energy has been a clear bright spot, rising strongly this year and giving the fund a bit of clean-tech spark. Sterling Infrastructure and TTM Technologies have also been steady climbers, helping the industrial and tech sleeves pull their weight. On the flip side, Credo Technology and Enova International have been lagging, acting as small anchors on an otherwise broadly diversified, domestically focused portfolio.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ― | 0.62% | $5.13M | ― | ― | ― | |
| Bloom Energy | 0.55% | $4.54M | $37.87B | 683.06% | 62 Neutral | |
| IES Holdings | 0.46% | $3.83M | $9.74B | 197.95% | 76 Outperform | |
| Fabrinet | 0.44% | $3.65M | $19.86B | 208.97% | 78 Outperform | |
| Sterling Infrastructure | 0.38% | $3.16M | $12.06B | 260.87% | 71 Outperform | |
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 0.35% | $2.93M | $18.90B | 185.32% | 77 Outperform | |
| Nextpower Inc | 0.35% | $2.91M | $16.04B | 185.12% | 78 Outperform | |
| Watts Water Technologies | 0.34% | $2.85M | $9.60B | 57.42% | 77 Outperform | |
| TTM Technologies | 0.34% | $2.83M | $9.90B | 432.55% | 77 Outperform | |
| The Ensign Group | 0.34% | $2.79M | $11.51B | 58.85% | 78 Outperform |
GSSC Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
77.15
Negative
76.58
Negative
74.24
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.61
Negative
51.39
Neutral
85.75
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSSC, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 74.54, equal to the 50-day MA of 77.15, and equal to the 200-day MA of 74.24, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.61 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 51.39 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 85.75 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for GSSC.
GSSC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GSSC
Goldman Sachs Activebeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
75.75
20.58
37.30%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
―
―
―
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
―
―
―
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
EES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund
―
―
―
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents