Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
SMDV - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV)
Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings Performance
Most of the largest positions have shown strong gains this year, helping support the ETF’s overall returns.
Diversified Sector Mix
Holdings spread across financials, industrials, utilities, materials, real estate, and other sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Solid Recent Performance Trend
The ETF has delivered steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Market Concentration
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy.
Sector Concentration in Financials and Industrials
A large share of the portfolio is in financial and industrial stocks, which can increase risk if these sectors face a downturn.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not especially low for an ETF, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.
SMDV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM621.65M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.67
IssuerProShares
Inception DateFeb 05, 2015
Dividend Yield2.57%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedRussell 2000 Dividend Growth Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume34,244
30 Day Avg. Volume20,980
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
80.74Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering102
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
SMDV Summary
SMDV is the ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF. It follows the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index, which focuses on smaller U.S. companies that have a history of steadily increasing their dividends. These are mainly financial, industrial, and utility businesses, including names like Insperity and Matson. Someone might invest in SMDV to get diversified exposure to small-cap stocks with both growth potential and a stream of dividend income. A key risk is that small-cap stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can go up and down more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, meaning you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is actively managed to focus on small-cap companies with consistent dividend growth, which requires more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?The ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) could benefit from a strong U.S. economy, as small-cap companies often thrive during periods of growth and innovation, while its focus on dividend-paying firms provides stability. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact small-cap stocks and sectors like financials and industrials, which make up a significant portion of the ETF's holdings. Regulatory changes or sector-specific challenges in utilities and real estate could also influence performance.
SMDV Top 10 Holdings
SMDV’s story is all about steady, dividend-focused small caps rather than flashy high-fliers. Industrial and materials names like Gorman-Rupp, Stepan, and Matson have been quietly rising, giving the fund a solid backbone, while Alamo Group and Trinity Industries add more industrial punch with generally supportive trends despite some balance-sheet and segment challenges. Power Integrations, one of the few tech holdings, has been more mixed, keeping a lid on upside. With all holdings based in the U.S. and a tilt toward financials, industrials, and utilities, this ETF is a domestically rooted, income-minded small-cap play.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Andersons | 1.35% | $8.37M | $2.40B | 68.79% | 71 Outperform | |
| Power Integrations | 1.24% | $7.69M | $2.63B | -17.12% | 61 Neutral | |
| Matson | 1.23% | $7.62M | $4.56B | 15.10% | 77 Outperform | |
| Lemaitre Vascular | 1.22% | $7.57M | $2.46B | 31.92% | 75 Outperform | |
| Gorman-Rupp Company | 1.19% | $7.38M | $1.52B | 53.54% | 76 Outperform | |
| Gladstone Land | 1.18% | $7.36M | $470.74M | 4.99% | 61 Neutral | |
| H2O America | 1.17% | $7.28M | $2.46B | 8.95% | 69 Neutral | |
| New Jersey Resources | 1.16% | $7.23M | $5.55B | 11.89% | 64 Neutral | |
| Getty Realty | 1.13% | $7.03M | $1.98B | 8.15% | 78 Outperform | |
| WD-40 Company | 1.12% | $6.98M | $3.03B | -5.71% | 73 Outperform |
SMDV Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
70.69
Negative
68.38
Negative
66.82
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.71
Positive
29.99
Positive
13.56
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SMDV, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 71.54, equal to the 50-day MA of 70.69, and equal to the 200-day MA of 66.82, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.71 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 29.99 is Positive, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 13.56 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for SMDV.
SMDV Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
68.62
3.28
5.02%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
―
―
―
GSSC
Goldman Sachs Activebeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
―
―
―
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
EES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents