tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RSPR - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPR

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
RSPR, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF, has a generally positive rating driven by solid underlying real estate companies with decent financial performance and income potential. Strong holdings like Welltower (WELL), AvalonBay (AVB), and Realty Income (O) support the fund through good earnings, strategic growth moves, and attractive dividends, while names such as Healthpeak Properties (DOC) and BXP face profitability and leverage challenges that weigh somewhat on the overall picture. The main risk is that the ETF is concentrated in the real estate sector, where several holdings show bearish technical trends, high valuation concerns, and sensitivity to regional or market-specific headwinds.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year and over the past few months, showing positive momentum in its real estate holdings.
Equal-Weight Real Estate Exposure
By weighting its S&P 500 real estate stocks more evenly, the fund avoids relying too heavily on just one or two large companies.
Multiple Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Welltower, Ventas, and Healthpeak Properties, have posted strong year-to-date gains that support the fund’s overall performance.
Negative Factors
Single-Sector Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are in the real estate sector, so investors are heavily exposed to swings in property markets.
U.S.-Only Geographic Focus
With nearly all holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers little diversification across different countries or regions.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
A few major positions, such as CBRE Group and BXP, have shown weak or negative year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall returns.

RSPR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPR Summary

RSPR is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF, which follows a real estate version of the S&P 500 index. It invests mainly in U.S. real estate companies that own or manage properties like shopping centers, apartments, offices, and warehouses. Well-known holdings include Simon Property Group and Realty Income. Because each company is given similar weight, the fund avoids putting too much money into any single stock, helping with diversification. Investors might consider RSPR for long-term growth and income from the real estate sector. A key risk is that real estate stocks can go up and down with interest rates and the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it uses an equal weight methodology and focuses on a specific sector, which requires more active management compared to broad market index ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) could benefit from positive trends such as urbanization, demographic shifts, and increased demand for commercial and residential properties, which drive growth in the real estate sector. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact property values and rental income, affecting the ETF's performance. Its focus on U.S. real estate and equal weight methodology provides diversification but also exposes it to risks tied to domestic economic conditions and regulatory changes.

RSPR Top 10 Holdings

RSPR is a pure U.S. real estate play, and its story right now is all about health care and data. Senior-housing giants Welltower and Ventas have been rising, giving the fund a solid tailwind, while Healthpeak adds more momentum despite some underlying profitability issues. On the tech side of real estate, Equinix and Iron Mountain have been standout winners, though their rich valuations and choppy trading can make the ride bumpy. Offsetting some of that strength, CBRE has been lagging, acting as a mild brake on overall performance.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
CBRE Group3.59%$3.69M$42.51B-4.63%
70
Outperform
Welltower3.59%$3.69M$168.97B41.02%
77
Outperform
BXP3.53%$3.62M$12.28B8.51%
62
Neutral
Ventas3.51%$3.60M$49.03B38.53%
68
Neutral
Simon Property3.49%$3.58M$74.38B42.75%
70
Outperform
Healthpeak Properties3.47%$3.56M$15.42B30.17%
58
Neutral
Digital Realty3.45%$3.53M$69.75B9.47%
69
Neutral
Host Hotels & Resorts3.38%$3.46M$17.21B61.82%
77
Outperform
Realty Income3.34%$3.43M$59.56B12.90%
70
Outperform
Iron Mountain3.26%$3.34M$36.39B29.95%
55
Neutral

RSPR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
36.63
Positive
100DMA
35.51
Positive
200DMA
34.56
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
RSI
STOCH
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.02, equal to the 50-day MA of 36.63, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.56, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPR.

RSPR Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$100.78M0.40%
68
Neutral
$874.78M0.48%
70
Outperform
$491.54M0.50%
68
Neutral
$317.44M0.35%
59
Neutral
$308.01M0.68%
70
Neutral
$109.48M0.50%
55
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
37.07
3.23
9.54%
REZ
iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF
JPRE
JPMorgan Realty Income ETF
KBWY
Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF
IYRI
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
RIET
Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement