RSPM - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM)
Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, suggesting its equal-weight materials approach has recently worked in investors’ favor.
Multiple Strong-Performing Holdings
Several top holdings, including companies like Corteva, Ball, CF Industries, and Air Products and Chemicals, have shown strong or steady performance, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Balanced Exposure Across Top Positions
The largest holdings each make up a similar share of the portfolio, which helps avoid relying too heavily on any single stock.
Negative Factors
Recent Short-Term Weakness
The ETF has shown weak performance over the last three months, indicating some recent pressure on the materials and related holdings.
Underperforming Top Holdings
Some key positions, such as International Paper, Mosaic, and Sherwin-Williams, have lagged, which can drag on the fund’s overall results.
High Concentration in U.S. Materials and Consumer Cyclical Stocks
With almost all assets in U.S. companies and heavy exposure to the materials and consumer cyclical sectors, the fund is sensitive to downturns in these specific areas of the economy.
RSPM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM182.79M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.78
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 01, 2006
Dividend Yield1.76%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weighted / Materials -SEC
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume42,507
30 Day Avg. Volume19,972
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
44.83Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering26
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSPM Summary
RSPM is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF, which follows a materials-focused version of the S&P 500 index. It invests in U.S. companies that make chemicals, packaging, construction materials, and paper products. Well-known holdings include Sherwin-Williams and International Paper. Because each company is given roughly the same weight, you’re not overly dependent on a few giants, which can help with diversification and give smaller firms a chance to contribute to returns. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the materials sector, so its value can rise or fall sharply with economic cycles and commodity prices.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds. It’s a reasonable cost for investors seeking targeted exposure to the materials sector with balanced diversification.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) could benefit from increased demand for materials driven by infrastructure spending, construction growth, or advancements in green technologies, which often rely on metals and chemicals. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for companies in the sector, or economic slowdowns that reduce demand for raw materials. Its focus on U.S.-based companies and equal weighting provides diversification but may limit exposure to faster-growing international markets.
RSPM Top 10 Holdings
RSPM is very much a U.S. materials story, with a clear tilt toward packaging, chemicals, and fertilizers rather than flashy tech. CF Industries has been one of the fund’s key engines, rising on strong fundamentals and helping lift overall returns, while Corteva and Air Products are also pulling their weight with steady to rising momentum. On the flip side, Mosaic is dragging the fund a bit as its performance has lagged, and Ecolab looks a bit tired. With equal weights, no single name dominates, but the sector bet is unmistakably materials-heavy.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Paper Co | 4.93% | $8.85M | $21.62B | -10.01% | 49 Neutral | |
| Amcor | 4.57% | $8.19M | $20.75B | -2.08% | 73 Outperform | |
| Smurfit Westrock | 4.56% | $8.18M | $24.03B | 6.40% | 69 Neutral | |
| Ball | 4.51% | $8.09M | $17.28B | 13.09% | 59 Neutral | |
| Sherwin-Williams Company | 4.41% | $7.92M | $82.74B | 1.83% | 66 Neutral | |
| Packaging | 4.39% | $7.88M | $21.90B | 30.04% | 76 Outperform | |
| Avery Dennison | 4.18% | $7.50M | $12.98B | 2.94% | 73 Outperform | |
| Mosaic Co | 4.17% | $7.48M | $7.03B | -38.60% | 65 Neutral | |
| Ecolab | 4.12% | $7.39M | $78.14B | 5.73% | 66 Neutral | |
| International Flavors & Fragrances | 4.11% | $7.38M | $20.23B | 14.87% | 61 Neutral |
RSPM Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
38.94
Positive
38.77
Positive
36.95
Positive
Market Momentum
0.32
Negative
61.88
Neutral
76.37
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPM, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 39.01, equal to the 50-day MA of 38.94, and equal to the 200-day MA of 36.95, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.32 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 61.88 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 76.37 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPM.
RSPM Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSPM
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF
40.48
9.31
29.87%
REZ
iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
―
―
―
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
―
―
―
FXZ
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents