Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
RSPM - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM)
Rating:63Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Strong Top Holdings
Most of the top 10 holdings have delivered strong year-to-date gains, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Diversified Materials Exposure
The fund spreads its assets across many materials and related companies, reducing the impact if any single stock runs into trouble.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration Risk
With the vast majority of assets in the materials and related consumer cyclical space, the ETF is heavily exposed to swings in commodity and industrial cycles.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The portfolio is concentrated mainly in U.S. companies, offering only a small allocation outside the U.S. and less global diversification.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low for a passive ETF, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.
RSPM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM179.26M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.83
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 01, 2006
Dividend Yield1.86%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weighted / Materials -SEC
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume38,673
30 Day Avg. Volume37,250
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
44.04Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering27
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSPM Summary
RSPM is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF, which follows the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Materials index. It invests mainly in U.S. materials companies involved in chemicals, metals and mining, packaging, and construction materials. Well-known holdings include Dow Inc. and Freeport-McMoRan. Because each company is given roughly the same weight, smaller and mid-sized firms can have as much impact as larger ones, offering more balanced exposure to the sector. Someone might invest for targeted growth in the materials space and added diversification, but should know the fund can rise or fall sharply with the materials sector and the broader stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds. It’s a reasonable cost for investors seeking targeted exposure to the materials sector with balanced diversification.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) could benefit from increased demand for materials driven by infrastructure spending, construction growth, or advancements in green technologies, which often rely on metals and chemicals. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for companies in the sector, or economic slowdowns that reduce demand for raw materials. Its focus on U.S.-based companies and equal weighting provides diversification but may limit exposure to faster-growing international markets.
RSPM Top 10 Holdings
RSPM is a pure U.S. materials play, and its story right now is about broad strength with a few trouble spots. Freeport-McMoRan and Newmont are helping lead the charge, riding firm metals and mining sentiment, while CF Industries and Linde add steady support from chemicals and industrial gases. Packaging names like Ball and Smurfit Westrock are also rising, giving the fund a lift from the containers and paper side. Albemarle, however, is more of a wild card—its recent wobble in lithium leaves the fund with a bit of a speed bump amid an otherwise solid sector run.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cf Industries Holdings | 5.98% | $10.55M | $19.91B | 69.08% | 72 Outperform | |
| LyondellBasell | 5.49% | $9.70M | $23.29B | -2.49% | 52 Neutral | |
| Dow Inc | 5.11% | $9.02M | $26.28B | -0.95% | 49 Neutral | |
| Mosaic Co | 4.41% | $7.79M | $9.31B | 13.17% | 65 Neutral | |
| Ball | 4.32% | $7.62M | $16.55B | 19.85% | 59 Neutral | |
| Freeport-McMoRan | 4.26% | $7.52M | $81.03B | 45.12% | 67 Neutral | |
| Linde | 4.18% | $7.37M | $228.88B | 8.43% | 66 Neutral | |
| Albemarle | 4.11% | $7.26M | $18.65B | 110.32% | 58 Neutral | |
| Air Products and Chemicals | 4.10% | $7.24M | $64.12B | -1.35% | 46 Neutral | |
| Corteva | 4.10% | $7.23M | $53.27B | 32.41% | 75 Outperform |
RSPM Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
38.27
Negative
35.50
Positive
34.06
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.11
Positive
39.89
Neutral
30.72
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPM, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 39.53, equal to the 50-day MA of 38.27, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.06, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.11 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 39.89 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 30.72 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPM.
RSPM Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSPM
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF
37.93
6.17
19.43%
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF
―
―
―
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
―
―
―
FXZ
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents