tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RSPE - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPE

Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
RSPE, the Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, has a solid overall rating, helped by strong contributors like NetApp, Corning, Akamai, and AT&T, which benefit from healthy earnings, growth in areas like cloud, AI, and security, and generally positive business momentum. However, weaker names such as Air Products and Dow, which face profitability, cash flow, and broader market challenges, weigh on the fund, and investors should also be aware of risks tied to leverage, valuation concerns, and some bearish technical trends across several holdings.
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Strong Top Holdings Momentum
Several of the largest positions, especially in technology and related industries, have shown strong recent performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively low for an ESG-focused, equal-weight strategy, helping investors keep more of their gains over time.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market weakens.
Small Asset Base
The fund manages a relatively modest amount of assets, which can sometimes mean lower trading volume and wider bid-ask spreads for investors.
Cyclical and Tech Sensitivity
Meaningful exposure to technology, industrials, and consumer cyclical sectors may make the ETF more sensitive to economic slowdowns and market swings.

RSPE vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPE Summary

The Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Scored & Screened Leaders Select Index, focusing on large U.S. companies that meet environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards. Instead of letting the biggest companies dominate, it gives each stock a similar weight, spreading your money more evenly across sectors like technology, industrials, and finance. Well-known holdings include Intel and Moderna. Someone might invest for broad, diversified exposure to U.S. stocks with an ESG tilt. A key risk is that the share price can rise or fall with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) has an expense ratio of 0.20%, which means you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an equal weight strategy and incorporates ESG criteria, which require more active management compared to traditional passive funds. However, it may appeal to investors seeking a balanced and socially responsible investment approach.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPE ETF could benefit from growing investor interest in ESG-focused funds and the strong performance of large-cap technology and industrial companies, which are among its top sector exposures. However, it may face challenges if regulatory changes or economic downturns negatively impact ESG criteria or large-cap stocks, particularly in sectors like technology and financials. Additionally, rising interest rates could pressure growth-oriented sectors and reduce demand for equities overall.

RSPE Top 10 Holdings

RSPE’s story is less about one superstar and more about a deep bench of U.S. names, with a clear tilt toward tech, industrials, and materials. Chip players like Micron and Western Digital have been rising on AI-related optimism, helping pull the fund forward, while Lam Research has cooled a bit after a strong run. Materials giants like Dow and LyondellBasell are rebounding, adding some cyclical punch despite their underlying business headwinds. Moderna’s sharp recovery adds extra fuel, making this ESG-screened, equal-weight portfolio a broadly diversified but tech-leaning ride.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Intel0.72%$358.93K$327.27B221.46%
64
Neutral
Corning0.72%$358.58K$150.47B313.64%
74
Outperform
Western Digital0.70%$352.70K$118.72B877.55%
77
Outperform
Lam Research0.66%$332.48K$333.82B298.03%
77
Outperform
Advanced Micro Devices0.66%$330.31K$402.43B167.68%
73
Outperform
KLA0.66%$328.35K$231.85B165.58%
77
Outperform
Jabil0.65%$323.76K$32.22B125.79%
73
Outperform
Hewlett Packard Enterprise0.64%$320.71K$32.92B73.74%
68
Neutral
ON Semiconductor0.64%$319.98K$27.98B100.98%
73
Outperform
Keysight Technologies0.63%$314.45K$56.79B141.88%
77
Outperform

RSPE Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
30.45
Positive
100DMA
30.11
Positive
200DMA
29.13
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.03
Negative
RSI
60.43
Neutral
STOCH
93.71
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPE, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.68, equal to the 50-day MA of 30.45, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.13, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.03 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 60.43 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 93.71 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPE.

RSPE Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$50.69M0.20%
71
Outperform
$99.00M0.30%
72
Outperform
$96.65M0.60%
70
Outperform
$95.51M0.79%
71
Outperform
$92.19M0.45%
69
Neutral
$84.91M0.92%
62
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
30.87
7.21
30.47%
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
EGGY
NestYield Dynamic Income Shield ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement