RSPC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC)
Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Equal-Weight Approach
The fund spreads its investments fairly evenly across many communication services stocks, so returns are not dominated by just one or two giants.
Mix of Strong and Weak Performers
Several top holdings like Echostar, Charter Communications, New York Times, and Meta have shown positive performance this year, helping offset weaker names in the portfolio.
Pure Play on U.S. Communication Services
Almost all assets are invested in U.S.-based communication services companies, giving focused exposure to this specific part of the market.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration Risk
Nearly all of the fund’s assets are in the communication services sector, so it could be hit hard if this industry struggles.
Recent Weak Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF’s overall performance so far this year has been negative, reflecting pressure on several of its holdings.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are eaten up by fees over time.
RSPC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM61.82M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.67
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 07, 2018
Dividend Yield1.71%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume14,713
30 Day Avg. Volume9,008
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
46.02Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering26
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSPC Summary
RSPC is an ETF that follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, focusing on U.S. communication services companies like media, entertainment, telecom, and online platforms. Instead of letting the biggest companies dominate, it gives each stock a similar weight, so well-known names like Walt Disney and Meta Platforms sit alongside smaller players. Someone might invest in RSPC to tap into the long-term growth of streaming, social media, and digital communication while spreading their money across many companies in this sector. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to communication and media stocks, which can be quite volatile.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the ETF uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds. It’s designed to provide balanced exposure to the communication services sector.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPC ETF, focused on the U.S. communication services sector, could benefit from increasing demand for digital connectivity, streaming services, and interactive media, driven by technological advancements and changing consumer habits. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can pressure growth-focused companies, and potential regulatory scrutiny on major players like Meta and Netflix. The equal-weight strategy helps reduce concentration risk but may limit gains if larger companies outperform.
RSPC Top 10 Holdings
RSPC is a pure play on U.S. communication services, but because it’s equal-weighted, no single giant runs the show. Recent gains are being nudged along by rising names like Echostar and Live Nation, which are giving the fund some welcome lift. On the flip side, Paramount Skydance and Pinterest have been lagging, acting like a bit of an anchor on returns, while Disney and Warner Bros. look more mixed. Overall, it’s a diversified bet across media, entertainment, and digital platforms rather than a one-stock or one-theme story.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Echostar | 5.34% | $3.24M | $35.99B | 508.30% | 57 Neutral | |
| Paramount Skydance | 4.98% | $3.02M | $11.71B | -13.80% | 49 Neutral | |
| Take-Two | 4.95% | $3.00M | $42.25B | -2.47% | 53 Neutral | |
| 4.91% | $2.98M | $10.81B | -38.62% | 77 Outperform | ||
| Walt Disney | 4.87% | $2.95M | $178.86B | -8.08% | 75 Outperform | |
| Electronic Arts | 4.63% | $2.81M | $50.39B | 36.91% | 70 Outperform | |
| Live Nation Entertainment | 4.62% | $2.80M | $38.53B | 16.43% | 69 Neutral | |
| New York Times | 4.61% | $2.80M | $12.13B | 35.24% | 79 Outperform | |
| Warner Bros | 4.52% | $2.74M | $67.77B | 182.72% | 68 Neutral | |
| Omnicom Group | 4.39% | $2.66M | $21.36B | 0.22% | 73 Outperform |
RSPC Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
37.88
Negative
38.24
Negative
38.67
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.13
Positive
45.94
Neutral
59.30
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPC, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.84, equal to the 50-day MA of 37.88, and equal to the 200-day MA of 38.67, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.13 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 45.94 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 59.30 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPC.
RSPC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSPC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
37.64
1.91
5.35%
GXPT
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
―
―
―
GXPC
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF
―
―
―
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
―
―
―
PSL
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF
―
―
―
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents