tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSPC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPC

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
RSPC, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven by strong, established holdings like Verizon, Meta Platforms, Disney, and Comcast, which combine healthy financial performance with generally positive outlooks. These strengths are partly offset by weaker names such as Echostar and Take-Two, where financial challenges and valuation concerns weigh on the fund, and investors should also note the main risk that the ETF is concentrated in a single sector—communication services—making it more sensitive to industry-specific downturns.
Positive Factors
Equal-Weight Approach
The fund spreads its investments fairly evenly across many communication services stocks, so it does not rely too heavily on just one or two big names.
Focused Industry Exposure
By concentrating on communication services companies, the ETF gives investors targeted access to a specific part of the market that can benefit from long-term trends in media, entertainment, and connectivity.
Strong Standout Holding
One of the top holdings has shown strong gains this year, helping to offset some of the weakness in other positions.
Negative Factors
Single-Sector Concentration
Almost all of the fund is invested in the communication services sector, which increases the risk if this industry struggles.
Weak Recent Performance
The ETF has shown negative performance over the past month, three months, and year to date, signaling recent headwinds for its holdings.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are eaten up by fees over time.

RSPC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPC Summary

RSPC is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF. It tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, which focuses on U.S. companies in telecom, media, entertainment, and online services. Instead of letting the biggest companies dominate, it gives each stock a similar weight, so giants like Comcast and Walt Disney sit alongside smaller players. Someone might invest for targeted exposure to trends like streaming, gaming, and digital connectivity, while still getting diversification within this sector. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to communication and media stocks, which can rise and fall sharply with industry news and market swings.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the ETF uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds. It’s designed to provide balanced exposure to the communication services sector.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPC ETF, focused on the U.S. communication services sector, could benefit from increasing demand for digital connectivity, streaming services, and interactive media, driven by technological advancements and changing consumer habits. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can pressure growth-focused companies, and potential regulatory scrutiny on major players like Meta and Netflix. The equal-weight strategy helps reduce concentration risk but may limit gains if larger companies outperform.

RSPC Top 10 Holdings

RSPC is a pure play on U.S. communication services, and its story right now is a tug-of-war between a few rising stars and several names losing steam. Echostar has been one of the brighter spots, helping to prop up returns with strong recent momentum. Warner Bros. Discovery has also shown renewed life lately, adding some spark from the media side. On the flip side, heavyweight staples like Comcast, Verizon, and Live Nation have been lagging, while Disney and Take-Two are more mixed, keeping the fund’s equal-weight, sector-focused engine from really hitting full speed.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Verizon5.85%$3.82M$206.65B19.56%
81
Outperform
Comcast5.78%$3.77M$113.58B-10.79%
74
Outperform
AT&T5.61%$3.66M$200.85B10.90%
71
Outperform
Live Nation Entertainment5.44%$3.55M$36.75B2.93%
69
Neutral
T Mobile US5.36%$3.50M$241.86B-18.95%
76
Outperform
Charter Communications5.35%$3.49M$33.98B-33.64%
69
Neutral
Echostar5.19%$3.38M$32.57B286.70%
57
Neutral
TKO Group Holdings5.01%$3.27M$40.33B17.81%
71
Outperform
Electronic Arts4.70%$3.07M$50.21B55.04%
70
Outperform
Meta Platforms4.68%$3.06M$1.62T-13.15%
76
Outperform

RSPC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
39.10
Negative
100DMA
39.13
Negative
200DMA
38.16
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.35
Positive
RSI
38.28
Neutral
STOCH
28.57
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPC, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 38.50, equal to the 50-day MA of 39.10, and equal to the 200-day MA of 38.16, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.35 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 38.28 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 28.57 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPC.

RSPC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$65.08M0.40%
$99.69M0.29%
$99.19M0.60%
$98.96M0.50%
$92.50M0.15%
$13.86M0.29%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
37.66
1.58
4.38%
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
PYZ
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF
RIET
Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF
GXPC
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement