RSPC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC)
Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Equal-Weight Approach
The fund spreads its investments fairly evenly across many communication services stocks, so no single company dominates the portfolio.
Strong Performers Among Top Holdings
Several major positions, such as Roku and Live Nation Entertainment, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Focused Industry Exposure
By concentrating on the communication services sector, the ETF gives investors targeted exposure to media, entertainment, and telecom companies in one investment.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration Risk
The ETF invests only in communication services companies, so it can be hit hard if this single sector experiences a downturn.
Weak Recent Overall Performance
The fund’s year-to-date and three-month results have been weak, reflecting pressure on many of its holdings.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF’s fee is not especially low, which slightly reduces the net return investors receive compared with cheaper index funds.
RSPC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM54.23M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.69
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 07, 2018
Dividend Yield1.87%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume8,903
30 Day Avg. Volume16,042
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
43.79Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering26
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSPC Summary
RSPC is an ETF that follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index, focusing on U.S. companies in telecom, media, entertainment, and online platforms. Instead of letting the biggest companies dominate, it gives each stock a similar weight, so you get a more balanced mix of well-known names like Meta Platforms and Comcast along with smaller players. Someone might invest in RSPC to tap into the long-term growth of digital communication and media while spreading risk across many companies in the sector. A key risk is that it is concentrated in communication services, so it can rise or fall sharply with that part of the market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the ETF uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds. It’s designed to provide balanced exposure to the communication services sector.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPC ETF, focused on the U.S. communication services sector, could benefit from increasing demand for digital connectivity, streaming services, and interactive media, driven by technological advancements and changing consumer habits. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can pressure growth-focused companies, and potential regulatory scrutiny on major players like Meta and Netflix. The equal-weight strategy helps reduce concentration risk but may limit gains if larger companies outperform.
RSPC Top 10 Holdings
RSPC is a pure play on U.S. communication services, and its story right now is all about a tug-of-war between streaming, gaming, and digital platforms. Roku and Live Nation are rising and helping pull the fund higher, riding strong demand for connected TV and live events. Take-Two is also contributing, though its gains are a bit more mixed as investors weigh growth against profitability. On the flip side, Meta is losing steam and acting as a noticeable drag, while legacy media names like Warner Bros and Disney are still trying to find their footing.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roku | 5.78% | $3.13M | $21.22B | 57.32% | 65 Neutral | |
| Take-Two | 5.22% | $2.83M | $43.37B | 1.99% | 53 Neutral | |
| Meta Platforms | 5.06% | $2.74M | $1.59T | -15.21% | 76 Outperform | |
| Omnicom Group | 5.02% | $2.72M | $22.62B | 1.09% | 73 Outperform | |
| Live Nation Entertainment | 5.02% | $2.72M | $41.40B | 15.15% | 69 Neutral | |
| Electronic Arts | 4.91% | $2.66M | $52.39B | 36.92% | 70 Outperform | |
| Warner Bros | 4.72% | $2.56M | $64.81B | 92.22% | 68 Neutral | |
| AT&T | 4.72% | $2.56M | $157.88B | -17.76% | 71 Outperform | |
| New York Times | 4.59% | $2.48M | $11.81B | 32.77% | 79 Outperform | |
| Walt Disney | 4.49% | $2.43M | $166.48B | -23.88% | 75 Outperform |
RSPC Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
36.42
Negative
37.21
Negative
37.97
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.31
Positive
37.24
Neutral
5.36
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPC, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 35.81, equal to the 50-day MA of 36.42, and equal to the 200-day MA of 37.97, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.31 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 37.24 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 5.36 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPC.
RSPC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSPC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
34.82
-2.38
-6.40%
PSL
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF
―
―
―
PYZ
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF
―
―
―
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
―
―
―
GXPS
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
―
―
―
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents