tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSPC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPC

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
The overall rating of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) reflects a mix of strengths and challenges among its holdings. Disney and Verizon stand out as strong contributors due to their solid financial performance and strategic advancements, which bolster the fund’s rating. However, weaker holdings like Frontier Communications and Paramount Skydance, both facing significant profitability and growth challenges, have likely held back the ETF’s overall score. The fund’s concentration in the communication services sector may pose risks tied to industry-specific volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as Warner Bros and Paramount Skydance, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s overall returns.
Equal Weight Strategy
The ETF’s equal weight approach ensures no single stock dominates the portfolio, promoting balanced exposure across holdings.
Healthy Year-to-Date Performance
The fund has shown positive year-to-date returns, indicating solid performance in 2023.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration Risk
The ETF is heavily concentrated in the Communication Services sector, making it vulnerable to downturns in this industry.
Geographic Overexposure
With nearly all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund lacks diversification across global markets.
Mixed Holding Performance
Some top holdings, like Trade Desk and Omnicom Group, have underperformed year-to-date, potentially dragging on overall returns.

RSPC Historical Chart

RSPC Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) focuses on companies in the communication services sector, including telecommunications, media, entertainment, and interactive media services. Unlike traditional ETFs, it uses an equal-weight strategy, giving each company the same importance in the portfolio. Some well-known holdings include Netflix and Meta Platforms. This ETF could be appealing for investors looking to benefit from the growth of digital connectivity and media consumption trends while maintaining balanced exposure across the sector. However, new investors should be aware that its performance is heavily tied to the communication services sector, which can be sensitive to changes in technology and consumer behavior.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) is 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the ETF uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed funds. It’s designed to provide balanced exposure to the communication services sector.
What would affect this ETF?The RSPC ETF, focused on the U.S. communication services sector, could benefit from increasing demand for digital connectivity, streaming services, and interactive media, driven by technological advancements and changing consumer habits. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can pressure growth-focused companies, and potential regulatory scrutiny on major players like Meta and Netflix. The equal-weight strategy helps reduce concentration risk but may limit gains if larger companies outperform.

RSPC Top 10 Holdings

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF is a balanced mix of media giants and telecom players, but recent performance has been a mixed bag. Warner Bros is rising on streaming success and box office wins, while Meta Platforms shows promise with AI-driven growth despite valuation concerns. On the flip side, Verizon is lagging, weighed down by competitive pressures, and Comcast struggles with segment-specific challenges. With its U.S.-focused exposure and a clear tilt toward communication services, the fund offers steady diversification but faces headwinds from some underperforming names.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Warner Bros10.44%$9.08M$68.83B159.78%
68
Neutral
Electronic Arts5.65%$4.91M$51.00B37.97%
70
Outperform
TKO Group Holdings5.16%$4.49M$41.64B48.70%
71
Outperform
Omnicom Group4.98%$4.33M$25.36B-9.71%
73
Outperform
Frontier Communications Parent4.81%$4.18M$9.54B9.96%
46
Neutral
Take-Two4.78%$4.16M$45.71B35.96%
53
Neutral
Walt Disney4.53%$3.94M$198.60B-0.70%
75
Outperform
Verizon4.32%$3.76M$167.90B-0.28%
81
Outperform
Comcast4.16%$3.62M$107.75B-22.63%
74
Outperform
Meta Platforms4.14%$3.60M$1.66T12.56%
76
Outperform

RSPC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
38.99
Positive
100DMA
39.05
Positive
200DMA
37.30
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.20
Negative
RSI
55.83
Neutral
STOCH
39.22
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 39.03, equal to the 50-day MA of 38.99, and equal to the 200-day MA of 37.30, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.20 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 55.83 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 39.22 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPC.

RSPC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$87.09M0.40%
$98.44M0.60%
$97.65M0.50%
$96.83M0.61%
$53.45M0.15%
$13.26M0.29%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
39.38
5.10
14.88%
FTXN
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF
RIET
Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
GXPC
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement