tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

QNXT - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

QNXT

iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
QNXT, the iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF, has an overall rating that reflects a generally solid lineup of mid-to-large tech and growth names with good financial health and growth prospects. Strong contributors like ASML, Adobe, Analog Devices, Honeywell, and Vertex support the fund through robust profitability, positive earnings calls, and strategic growth initiatives, especially in areas like AI and advanced semiconductors. The rating is held back somewhat by weaker names such as Starbucks, which faces high leverage and declining margins, and by valuation and technical risks across several holdings, with a key overall risk being the fund’s heavy tilt toward growth-oriented technology and related sectors.
Positive Factors
Supportive Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Analog Devices, Honeywell, ASML, Starbucks, and Mercadolibre, have shown strong or steady performance, helping support the ETF’s overall returns.
Sector Diversification Across Growth Areas
The fund spreads its investments across technology, industrials, consumer cyclical, health care, and other sectors, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively low ongoing fee, which helps investors keep more of any returns generated over time.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Short-Term Performance
The ETF has shown weak results over the past one and three months, which may concern investors focused on near-term momentum.
Mixed Results Among Top Holdings
Some major positions like Adobe, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, CrowdStrike, and Comcast have been lagging, which can drag on the fund’s overall performance.
Heavy U.S. Market Concentration
With the vast majority of its assets in U.S. companies, the ETF offers limited geographic diversification and is highly sensitive to the U.S. market.

QNXT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

QNXT Summary

The iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) tracks the Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 Index, focusing on the “next tier” of large U.S. companies after the biggest names are removed. It holds many tech, industrial, and consumer businesses, including well-known companies like Adobe and Starbucks. Someone might invest in QNXT to seek growth from innovative firms while avoiding heavy concentration in the very largest tech giants, adding diversification to a portfolio. A key risk is that it is still heavily tilted toward growth and technology-related stocks, so its price can rise and fall sharply with the Nasdaq market.
How much will it cost me?The iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) has an expense ratio of 0.20%, meaning you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is lower than average for actively managed funds but slightly higher than many passively managed ETFs, as it focuses on a unique niche within the Nasdaq-100 Index.
What would affect this ETF?The QNXT ETF, with its focus on large-cap companies in technology, healthcare, and consumer sectors, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in these industries, especially as emerging leaders gain market share. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact growth-oriented stocks, and economic slowdowns that could affect consumer spending and corporate investments. Additionally, regulatory changes in the tech and healthcare sectors could create uncertainty for some of its top holdings.

QNXT Top 10 Holdings

QNXT leans heavily into U.S. tech and innovation, and its story starts with chip names like Analog Devices and ASML, which have been rising and giving the fund a solid tailwind. Industrial heavyweight Honeywell has also been steadily pulling its weight, adding some balance outside pure tech. On the softer side, software giant Adobe and cybersecurity player Palo Alto Networks have been lagging, acting like a bit of an anchor on recent returns. Consumer names like Starbucks and Comcast are more mixed, helping smooth out the ride but not fully offsetting the tech-related bumps.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Analog Devices3.54%$570.21K$149.42B46.62%
78
Outperform
Honeywell International3.52%$566.55K$149.07B11.95%
77
Outperform
Vertex Pharmaceuticals2.82%$452.91K$119.23B-7.02%
78
Outperform
ASML Holding2.79%$449.46K$515.87B88.47%
81
Outperform
Palo Alto Networks2.75%$442.92K$136.28B-8.40%
73
Outperform
Starbucks2.67%$429.02K$112.96B1.06%
56
Neutral
CrowdStrike Holdings2.62%$421.90K$112.04B24.89%
67
Neutral
Comcast2.59%$417.11K$108.51B-14.87%
74
Outperform
Constellation Energy Corporation2.59%$416.14K$109.24B39.41%
68
Neutral
Adobe2.47%$397.17K$102.35B-36.84%
80
Outperform

QNXT Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
27.80
Negative
100DMA
27.73
Negative
200DMA
27.13
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.17
Positive
RSI
42.09
Neutral
STOCH
8.51
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QNXT, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.58, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.80, and equal to the 200-day MA of 27.13, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.17 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 42.09 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 8.51 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for QNXT.

QNXT Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$16.09M0.20%
72
Outperform
$97.75M0.79%
70
Neutral
$96.13M0.60%
71
Outperform
$91.86M0.70%
73
Outperform
$91.17M0.30%
72
Outperform
$84.95M0.32%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
27.11
3.17
13.24%
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
BCUS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
RWLC
Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement