tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

QNXT - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

QNXT

iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
The ETF QNXT's overall rating reflects a mix of strong and moderate-performing holdings. Top contributors like Lam Research (LRCX) and KLA (KLAC) drive the fund's rating with robust financial performance, positive earnings sentiment, and strategic positioning in high-demand areas like AI and advanced technologies. However, weaker holdings such as Intel (INTC), which faces profitability and valuation challenges, and CrowdStrike (CRWD), with ongoing profitability issues, slightly weigh down the overall score. A key risk for this ETF is its exposure to companies with valuation concerns and sector-specific challenges, particularly in technology.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several top holdings, such as Lam Research and Intel, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF’s overall gains.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, including Technology, Consumer Cyclical, and Health Care, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively low, making it cost-effective for investors compared to other ETFs.
Negative Factors
High Technology Exposure
With over 42% of the portfolio in Technology, the ETF is heavily reliant on the performance of this sector, increasing sensitivity to tech market volatility.
Limited Geographic Exposure
The ETF is overwhelmingly focused on U.S. companies, offering minimal exposure to international markets.
Underperforming Holdings
Some top holdings, such as Comcast and Automatic Data Processing, have lagged in year-to-date performance, potentially dragging down returns.

QNXT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

QNXT Summary

The iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (Ticker: QNXT) is a fund that lets investors own shares in large-cap companies from the Nasdaq-100 Index, but it excludes the top 30 biggest companies. This means it focuses on the next tier of growing businesses in sectors like technology, healthcare, and consumer goods. Some well-known companies in this ETF include Intel and Lam Research. People might invest in QNXT to diversify their portfolio and tap into the growth potential of innovative companies that aren’t yet market giants. However, since it’s heavily focused on tech and growth-oriented sectors, its value can rise and fall with market trends.
How much will it cost me?The iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) has an expense ratio of 0.20%, meaning you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is lower than average for actively managed funds but slightly higher than many passively managed ETFs, as it focuses on a unique niche within the Nasdaq-100 Index.
What would affect this ETF?The QNXT ETF, with its focus on large-cap companies in technology, healthcare, and consumer sectors, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in these industries, especially as emerging leaders gain market share. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact growth-oriented stocks, and economic slowdowns that could affect consumer spending and corporate investments. Additionally, regulatory changes in the tech and healthcare sectors could create uncertainty for some of its top holdings.

QNXT Top 10 Holdings

The iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) leans heavily on technology, with nearly half of its portfolio in the sector, including names like Lam Research and Intel. Lam Research is rising steadily, fueled by its focus on AI and advanced technologies, while Intel’s mixed performance reflects profitability challenges despite revenue growth. KLA is holding steady, benefiting from demand in advanced packaging, though export controls on China remain a headwind. On the downside, Analog Devices and Comcast are lagging, with weak momentum and bearish signals. With its U.S.-centric exposure, QNXT offers a fresh take on large-cap innovation but faces hurdles from valuation concerns and sector-specific risks.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Lam Research4.54%$744.06K$205.06B106.09%
77
Outperform
Intel3.65%$598.54K$177.97B86.79%
64
Neutral
KLA3.58%$587.18K$160.74B85.81%
77
Outperform
Analog Devices3.08%$505.76K$136.32B30.45%
78
Outperform
CrowdStrike Holdings2.73%$447.46K$123.16B34.61%
67
Neutral
Vertex Pharmaceuticals2.67%$437.38K$115.43B0.45%
78
Outperform
Comcast2.58%$423.57K$108.33B-19.92%
72
Outperform
Automatic Data Processing2.49%$407.76K$106.03B-7.98%
70
Outperform
Constellation Energy Corporation2.46%$404.05K$114.18B51.03%
72
Outperform
Mercadolibre2.24%$367.93K$98.03B11.65%
77
Outperform

QNXT Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
27.64
Negative
100DMA
27.15
Positive
200DMA
25.93
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.10
Positive
RSI
44.98
Neutral
STOCH
2.93
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QNXT, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.51, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.64, and equal to the 200-day MA of 25.93, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.10 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 44.98 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 2.93 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for QNXT.

QNXT Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$16.73M0.20%
$98.26M0.20%
$97.76M0.14%
$97.65M0.30%
$97.49M0.79%
$95.04M0.70%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
27.34
3.24
13.44%
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
LRND
IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
BCUS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement