tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

PJP - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PJP

Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
PJP, the Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven by strong, diversified holdings like Merck, Johnson & Johnson, Gilead, and Amgen, which all benefit from robust financial performance, positive earnings calls, and strategic growth initiatives. This strength is partly offset by weaker names such as Liquidia Technologies and Viatris, where high leverage, negative or challenged profitability, and weaker valuations weigh on the fund, and the main risk is its concentrated exposure to the pharmaceutical sector, which can amplify industry-specific setbacks.
Positive Factors
Strong Large-Cap Pharma Holdings
Several major drug companies in the top holdings have shown solid gains this year, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Recent Short-Term Momentum
The ETF has delivered strong performance over the last three months, indicating improving short-term momentum despite a weak year-to-date result.
Focused Exposure to U.S. Health Care
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. health care companies, giving targeted exposure to a defensive sector that can be more resilient in economic slowdowns.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
Nearly all of the fund is invested in health care, so it could be hit hard if the pharmaceutical industry faces regulatory or pricing pressures.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
A few sizable positions, such as Abbott and AbbVie, have been weak this year, which can drag on the ETF’s overall returns.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of the returns are eaten up by fees over time.

PJP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PJP Summary

PJP is the Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF, which follows the Dynamic Pharmaceutical Intellidex Index and focuses on U.S. drug and health care companies. It holds well-known names like Merck and Johnson & Johnson, along with other major pharmaceutical firms. Someone might invest in PJP to tap into the long-term growth potential of new medicines and an aging population, while still spreading money across many companies instead of picking just one stock. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in the pharmaceutical sector, so its price can swing with drug news, regulations, and health care policy changes.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) has an expense ratio of 0.57%, meaning you’ll pay $5.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is higher than average because it’s actively managed, focusing on selecting pharmaceutical stocks based on various strategic factors to optimize performance.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) could benefit from advancements in drug discovery, regulatory approvals, and the growing demand for pharmaceuticals driven by an aging population. However, it may face challenges from stricter regulations, patent expirations, or pricing pressures in the U.S. market, where it is heavily focused. The performance of its top holdings, such as AbbVie and Eli Lilly, will also play a significant role in shaping its future returns.

PJP Top 10 Holdings

PJP is a pure play on U.S. big pharma, with the fund’s story largely written by heavyweights like Merck, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Amgen, and Eli Lilly. Merck and J&J have been rising steadily, helping to pull the ETF higher, while Eli Lilly’s strong recent run has been a key engine of momentum. Smaller name Liquidia has been sprinting ahead, adding a speculative spark. On the flip side, Abbott and AbbVie have been lagging, acting as a bit of a brake on an otherwise solid health care convoy.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Gilead Sciences5.72%$22.97M$176.11B46.04%
78
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson5.56%$22.34M$547.51B49.36%
78
Outperform
Merck & Company5.54%$22.26M$273.69B11.59%
80
Outperform
Pfizer5.29%$21.25M$150.33B-0.30%
74
Outperform
Amgen5.16%$20.74M$184.10B19.78%
77
Outperform
AbbVie4.90%$19.69M$394.14B21.27%
66
Neutral
Eli Lilly & Co4.90%$19.68M$980.50B27.87%
72
Outperform
Abbott Laboratories4.33%$17.42M$190.06B-14.56%
73
Outperform
Liquidia Technologies3.96%$15.93M$3.69B197.89%
57
Neutral
Viatris3.46%$13.90M$15.08B16.05%
60
Neutral

PJP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
105.29
Negative
100DMA
99.93
Positive
200DMA
91.15
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.11
Positive
RSI
50.61
Neutral
STOCH
55.95
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PJP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 105.10, equal to the 50-day MA of 105.29, and equal to the 200-day MA of 91.15, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.11 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 50.61 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 55.95 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for PJP.

PJP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$398.52M0.57%
$974.47M0.38%
$964.10M0.62%
$769.94M0.40%
$718.30M0.38%
$289.03M0.35%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
105.26
20.36
23.98%
IHE
iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
IHF
iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement