tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

PINK - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PINK

Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
PINK, the Simplify Health Care ETF, has a solid but not top-tier rating, reflecting a mix of strong blue-chip healthcare leaders and some much riskier names. High-quality holdings like Regeneron, Amgen, Novo Nordisk, and UnitedHealth support the fund’s rating with strong financial performance, growth potential, and generally positive outlooks. However, weaker holdings such as PureCycle Technologies and Biohaven, which face serious financial challenges and high risk, drag on the overall rating and highlight the main risk: exposure to speculative companies within an otherwise strong healthcare portfolio.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past three months and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Health Care Holdings
Several major positions like Novo Nordisk, PureCycle Technologies, Align Tech, Amgen, and Biohaven have delivered strong year-to-date results, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Focused Health Care Exposure
With most assets in the health care sector, the ETF gives targeted access to a key defensive area of the market that can be resilient across economic cycles.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
Over 90% of the fund is invested in health care, so a downturn in this single sector could significantly hurt returns.
Top Holdings Concentration Risk
A small group of stocks makes up a large share of the portfolio, increasing the impact if any of these companies run into trouble.
Mixed Performance Among Key Stocks
Some important holdings like Regeneron, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Apellis Pharmaceuticals have shown weak or negative year-to-date performance, which can drag on the fund’s results.

PINK vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PINK Summary

The Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) is a fund that focuses on the health care theme rather than tracking a specific index. It invests mainly in U.S. health care companies across areas like drugs, medical devices, and health services. Well-known holdings include UnitedHealth and Eli Lilly, along with other biotech and pharmaceutical names. Someone might invest in PINK to seek long-term growth from medical innovation and the rising demand for health care as populations age. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in the health care sector, so its value can swing more than a broadly diversified market fund.
How much will it cost me?The Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) has an expense ratio of 0.5%, which means you’ll pay $5 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a specific sector like health care, which requires more research and expertise. It’s designed to give investors targeted exposure to innovative health care companies.
What would affect this ETF?The Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) could benefit from advancements in biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, as well as increased demand for health care services driven by aging populations and global health awareness. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, pricing pressures in the pharmaceutical industry, and potential economic downturns that could impact consumer spending on health care. Its strong U.S. focus and top holdings in companies like UnitedHealth and AbbVie position it well for growth but also expose it to risks tied to U.S. health care policies.

PINK Top 10 Holdings

PINK is a health care-heavy ETF with a clear tilt toward big drugmakers and a few high-risk innovators, all based in the U.S. and North America. Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly have been key engines of recent gains, riding strong momentum in cutting-edge treatments. UnitedHealth and Amgen are steadier anchors, adding stability even as they occasionally lose a bit of steam. On the riskier side, PureCycle and Biohaven are more like wild cards: their recent rebounds help, but ongoing financial strains mean they can still tug performance in the wrong direction.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Novo Nordisk9.61%$34.56M$283.19B-25.16%
73
Outperform
UnitedHealth7.86%$28.26M$318.53B-47.46%
72
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co6.74%$24.22M$1.00T29.28%
72
Outperform
PureCycle Technologies6.20%$22.27M$2.03B20.90%
38
Underperform
Amgen5.20%$18.68M$188.30B24.72%
77
Outperform
Align Tech5.06%$18.19M$12.03B-25.58%
74
Outperform
Regeneron4.82%$17.32M$80.15B12.22%
78
Outperform
Biohaven Ltd.3.43%$12.33M$1.85B-66.98%
40
Underperform
Jazz Pharmaceuticals3.38%$12.14M$10.11B35.07%
64
Neutral
Apellis Pharmaceuticals3.32%$11.92M$2.78B-25.99%
50
Neutral

PINK Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
37.07
Negative
100DMA
34.68
Positive
200DMA
31.93
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.24
Positive
RSI
44.54
Neutral
STOCH
36.15
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PINK, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.47, equal to the 50-day MA of 37.07, and equal to the 200-day MA of 31.93, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.24 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 44.54 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 36.15 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for PINK.

PINK Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$369.00M0.51%
$900.44M0.18%
$625.34M0.65%
$621.13M0.65%
$210.86M0.75%
$198.69M0.68%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
36.78
6.12
19.96%
IETC
iShares Evolved US Technology ETF
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
GTOP
Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
IYRI
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement