tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

PAMC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PAMC

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
PAMC, the Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF, has a solid overall rating supported by strong holdings like Woodward (WWD), Renaissancere Holdings (RNR), Curtiss-Wright (CW), and US Foods (USFD), which benefit from robust financial performance, positive earnings calls, and shareholder-friendly actions such as buybacks and dividends. The rating is held back somewhat by weaker names like Talen Energy (TLN), Lumentum (LITE), and Unum (UNM), where financial challenges, valuation concerns, and weaker technical trends introduce more uncertainty. A key risk factor is that several holdings face high valuation and potential overbought conditions, which could make the fund more sensitive to market pullbacks.
Positive Factors
Recent Solid Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including consumer, technology, financials, industrials, and energy, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Strong Contributors Among Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Alcoa, Echostar, Performance Food Group, and Fluor, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns go toward fees instead of staying with investors.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks and very little in other countries, the fund offers limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Several Weak Top Holdings
Some key positions, including American Airlines, TD SYNNEX, Renaissancere, Reinsurance Group, Macy’s, and Lithia Motors, have shown weak year-to-date performance that could drag on overall results.

PAMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PAMC Summary

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is a fund that invests mainly in medium‑sized U.S. companies, following the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It spreads money across many sectors like technology, consumer cyclical, and financials, and holds well-known names such as Alcoa and Macy’s. The fund uses a rules-based approach to tilt toward mid-cap stocks it views as attractive, aiming for a mix of growth and stability and offering diversification beyond large, familiar blue chips. A key risk is that mid-cap stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, meaning you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, using a multi-factor strategy to optimize portfolio performance. Active management typically involves more research and trading, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) could benefit from economic growth in the U.S., particularly in sectors like Industrials and Health Care, which are among its largest exposures. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns may negatively impact mid-cap companies and sectors like Real Estate and Financials, which are sensitive to such conditions. Additionally, regulatory changes or shifts in investor sentiment toward mid-cap stocks could influence the ETF's performance.

PAMC Top 10 Holdings

PAMC’s story is all about U.S. mid-caps where a few industrial and cyclical names are doing the heavy lifting while some consumer and financial plays wobble. Alcoa has been a clear bright spot, rising on renewed optimism in materials, and Echostar has also been climbing despite shaky fundamentals. Fluor is another name quietly helping, with recent gains offsetting earlier stumbles. On the flip side, American Airlines and Macy’s are losing steam, and TD SYNNEX has been lagging, reminding investors that this diversified, sector-balanced mid-cap mix can still be a bumpy ride.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Lumentum Holdings3.10%$1.88M$42.87B668.87%
61
Neutral
Performance Food Group2.72%$1.65M$15.47B13.56%
65
Neutral
Curtiss-Wright2.22%$1.35M$25.37B105.87%
74
Outperform
TD SYNNEX Corporation2.11%$1.28M$12.89B11.89%
73
Outperform
Woodward2.10%$1.27M$23.08B104.82%
79
Outperform
US Foods Holding2.07%$1.25M$21.42B34.86%
74
Outperform
Talen Energy Corp1.71%$1.04M$17.74B53.14%
60
Neutral
Twilio1.60%$968.38K$16.45B-8.75%
70
Neutral
Renaissancere Holdings1.58%$955.79K$13.36B32.04%
78
Outperform
Unum Group1.56%$947.03K$12.20B-2.24%
64
Neutral

PAMC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
48.62
Positive
100DMA
47.21
Positive
200DMA
45.59
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.59
Negative
RSI
62.79
Neutral
STOCH
79.82
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PAMC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 49.76, equal to the 50-day MA of 48.62, and equal to the 200-day MA of 45.59, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.59 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.79 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 79.82 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for PAMC.

PAMC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$60.53M0.60%
$88.26M0.15%
$40.08M0.80%
$33.48M0.59%
$22.83M0.18%
$7.43M0.35%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
50.76
5.53
12.23%
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
STXM
Strive Mid-Cap ETF
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement