PAMC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Recent Solid Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including consumer, technology, financials, industrials, and energy, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Strong Contributors Among Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Alcoa, Echostar, Performance Food Group, and Fluor, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns go toward fees instead of staying with investors.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks and very little in other countries, the fund offers limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Several Weak Top Holdings
Some key positions, including American Airlines, TD SYNNEX, Renaissancere, Reinsurance Group, Macy’s, and Lithia Motors, have shown weak year-to-date performance that could drag on overall results.
PAMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM56.86M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.60%
Beta0.87
IssuerPacer
Inception DateJun 24, 2020
Dividend Yield1.25%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedLunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,591
30 Day Avg. Volume3,143
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
58.53Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering133
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
PAMC Summary
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is a fund that invests mainly in medium‑sized U.S. companies, following the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It spreads money across many sectors like technology, consumer cyclical, and financials, and holds well-known names such as Alcoa and Macy’s. The fund uses a rules-based approach to tilt toward mid-cap stocks it views as attractive, aiming for a mix of growth and stability and offering diversification beyond large, familiar blue chips. A key risk is that mid-cap stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, meaning you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, using a multi-factor strategy to optimize portfolio performance. Active management typically involves more research and trading, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) could benefit from economic growth in the U.S., particularly in sectors like Industrials and Health Care, which are among its largest exposures. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns may negatively impact mid-cap companies and sectors like Real Estate and Financials, which are sensitive to such conditions. Additionally, regulatory changes or shifts in investor sentiment toward mid-cap stocks could influence the ETF's performance.
PAMC Top 10 Holdings
This mid-cap ETF is leaning heavily into U.S. industrials and financials, with names like Woodward and Curtiss-Wright doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares keep climbing on solid earnings and buybacks. Tech distributor TD SYNNEX and optical player Lumentum are also rising, giving the fund a helpful tailwind from the technology side. On the flip side, Twilio is clearly losing steam, and insurer Unum has been lagging, acting as small brakes on performance. Overall, it’s a U.S.-centric, sector-balanced play with a tilt toward economically sensitive mid-caps.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumentum Holdings | 6.00% | $3.45M | $50.04B | 885.97% | 61 Neutral | |
| Curtiss-Wright | 3.85% | $2.22M | $25.47B | 105.26% | 74 Outperform | |
| Woodward | 3.41% | $1.96M | $22.21B | 98.79% | 79 Outperform | |
| BWX Technologies | 2.52% | $1.45M | $19.11B | 109.66% | 75 Outperform | |
| Carpenter Technology | 2.48% | $1.43M | $19.30B | 110.12% | 75 Outperform | |
| Talen Energy Corp | 2.47% | $1.42M | $15.47B | 55.56% | 60 Neutral | |
| US Foods Holding | 2.06% | $1.18M | $19.62B | 36.71% | 74 Outperform | |
| RBC Bearings | 2.02% | $1.16M | $17.32B | 62.35% | 77 Outperform | |
| Twilio | 1.96% | $1.13M | $19.17B | 22.86% | 70 Neutral | |
| Somnigroup International | 1.91% | $1.10M | $15.90B | 40.85% | 72 Outperform |
PAMC Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
49.44
Negative
47.75
Positive
46.24
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.46
Positive
43.98
Neutral
36.81
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PAMC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 49.39, equal to the 50-day MA of 49.44, and equal to the 200-day MA of 46.24, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.46 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 43.98 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 36.81 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for PAMC.
PAMC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
48.36
6.31
15.01%
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
―
―
―
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
STXM
Strive Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents