PAMC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC)
Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and in recent months, suggesting its strategy has been working well in the current market.
Strong Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions, such as TD SYNNEX, Fabrinet, and TechnipFMC, have delivered strong year-to-date gains, helping drive the fund’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including industrials, financials, technology, consumer cyclical, energy, and others, which can help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of staying in investors’ pockets.
Small Asset Base
With a relatively modest amount of money invested in the fund, it may be less liquid and more vulnerable to large investor inflows or outflows than bigger ETFs.
Heavy U.S. Focus
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market faces a downturn.
PAMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM54.14M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.60%
Beta0.83
IssuerPacer
Inception DateJun 24, 2020
Dividend Yield1.12%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedLunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume2,242
30 Day Avg. Volume6,588
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
61.67Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering151
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
PAMC Summary
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) tracks the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, focusing on medium‑sized U.S. companies across many sectors like industrials, financials, and technology. It holds well-known names such as Alcoa and Royal Gold. The fund shifts its mix of stocks based on different styles, aiming to find a balance between growth and stability while giving investors broad diversification in mid-cap stocks. A key risk is that mid-cap shares can be more volatile than large, established companies, so the ETF’s value can go up and down with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, meaning you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, using a multi-factor strategy to optimize portfolio performance. Active management typically involves more research and trading, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) could benefit from economic growth in the U.S., particularly in sectors like Industrials and Health Care, which are among its largest exposures. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns may negatively impact mid-cap companies and sectors like Real Estate and Financials, which are sensitive to such conditions. Additionally, regulatory changes or shifts in investor sentiment toward mid-cap stocks could influence the ETF's performance.
PAMC Top 10 Holdings
PAMC is leaning heavily into U.S. industrial and tech-focused mid-caps, and that’s where most of the action is. Flex and Sterling Infrastructure have been the fund’s workhorses, rising steadily on strong growth stories, while TD SYNNEX and nVent Electric add more tech-flavored momentum despite some valuation jitters. Energy names like HF Sinclair are also pulling their weight, giving the portfolio a cyclical tilt. On the flip side, Royal Gold has been losing steam lately, acting as a small drag in an otherwise broadly rising, U.S.-centric lineup.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TD SYNNEX Corporation | 2.17% | $1.39M | $21.00B | 115.33% | 73 Outperform | |
| Flex | 2.13% | $1.36M | $55.24B | 256.45% | 74 Outperform | |
| Curtiss-Wright | 2.08% | $1.33M | $27.62B | 69.87% | 74 Outperform | |
| Alcoa | 1.97% | $1.26M | $20.49B | 190.03% | 76 Outperform | |
| Sterling Infrastructure | 1.91% | $1.22M | $26.42B | 357.87% | 71 Outperform | |
| HF Sinclair Corporation | 1.78% | $1.14M | $12.60B | 93.44% | 68 Neutral | |
| TechnipFMC | 1.78% | $1.14M | $27.28B | 119.65% | 80 Outperform | |
| nVent Electric | 1.48% | $946.54K | $27.01B | 153.78% | 76 Outperform | |
| Arrow Electronics | 1.47% | $943.32K | $10.97B | 81.30% | 64 Neutral | |
| Royal Gold | 1.43% | $917.52K | $19.05B | 26.03% | 78 Outperform |
PAMC Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
51.27
Positive
50.36
Positive
48.25
Positive
Market Momentum
0.64
Negative
61.53
Neutral
95.44
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PAMC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 53.09, equal to the 50-day MA of 51.27, and equal to the 200-day MA of 48.25, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.64 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 61.53 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 95.44 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for PAMC.
PAMC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
54.00
11.50
27.06%
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
―
―
―
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
―
―
―
EPMB
Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents