tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

OMAH - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

OMAH

VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
OMAH, the VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because it holds high-quality companies like Alphabet, Apple, American Express, and Chubb, which all show strong financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and generally supportive technical trends that point to solid growth potential. The rating is held back somewhat by weaker names like Kroger and DaVita, where profitability, leverage, and bearish price trends raise concerns, and by exposure to energy stocks such as Occidental and Chevron that face bearish momentum and revenue or valuation challenges, creating some sector and sentiment risk.
Positive Factors
Berkshire-Focused Strategy
The fund is built around many of Berkshire Hathaway’s well-known holdings, giving investors access to a curated group of established companies.
Sector Diversification Across Key Industries
Holdings spread across financials, consumer defensive, technology, energy, and other sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Several Strongly Performing Core Holdings
Some major positions in areas like energy, consumer staples, and technology have shown strong gains this year, helping offset weaker names in the portfolio.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Overall Performance
The ETF has delivered negative returns over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, signaling recent performance headwinds.
High Concentration in a Few Stocks and Financials
A small group of top holdings and a heavy tilt toward financial companies mean the fund is more exposed if these areas struggle.
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high management fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost ETFs.

OMAH vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

OMAH Summary

VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is an actively managed fund that follows the Solactive VistaShares Berkshire Select Index theme, focusing on a small group of large U.S. companies. It mainly holds well-known names like Berkshire Hathaway, Apple, American Express, Coca-Cola, and Chevron, and uses an options strategy to try to generate high income, targeting around 15% per year. Someone might consider this ETF for income plus exposure to strong, established companies. A key risk is that it is concentrated in a limited number of stocks and sectors, so its price can move up and down more than a broadly diversified fund.
How much will it cost me?The VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) has an expense ratio of 0.95%, meaning you’ll pay $9.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, which typically involves more research and trading compared to passively managed ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The OMAH ETF, with its focus on U.S. large-cap stocks and a covered call strategy, could benefit from strong performance in sectors like technology and financials, as well as stable consumer demand for defensive stocks like Coca-Cola. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could pressure financial stocks, and economic slowdowns that might impact consumer spending and energy demand. Regulatory changes or tax policies affecting large-cap companies could also influence the ETF's performance.

OMAH Top 10 Holdings

OMAH leans heavily into financials, with Berkshire Hathaway, American Express, Chubb, and Bank of America steering much of the ride, so when these names wobble, the whole fund feels it. Lately, Berkshire has been a bit sluggish and AmEx is clearly lagging, while Bank of America is more or less steady, keeping financials from really pulling ahead. On the brighter side, energy stakes like Occidental and Chevron are powering higher, and consumer staples such as Coca-Cola are quietly lifting returns. Apple adds a touch of Big Tech, but its mixed performance means it’s no longer the star of the show. Overall, this is a U.S.-centric, Buffett-flavored portfolio where energy and defensives are doing the heavy lifting while some core financials catch their breath.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Berkshire Hathaway B9.93%$67.54M$1.06T-5.84%
66
Neutral
Apple9.87%$67.15M$3.73T19.53%
79
Outperform
American Express8.20%$55.76M$206.17B14.29%
80
Outperform
Occidental Petroleum5.86%$39.87M$56.94B21.15%
67
Neutral
Coca-Cola5.28%$35.91M$333.65B11.82%
75
Outperform
Chevron5.02%$34.14M$395.03B23.11%
71
Outperform
Kroger Company4.76%$32.41M$46.91B12.32%
56
Neutral
Alphabet Class A4.59%$31.21M$3.75T93.51%
85
Outperform
DaVita4.57%$31.07M$10.02B0.41%
59
Neutral
Chubb4.52%$30.77M$129.09B11.91%
80
Outperform

OMAH Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
18.23
Negative
100DMA
18.21
Negative
200DMA
17.95
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.03
Positive
RSI
48.94
Neutral
STOCH
44.82
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OMAH, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 18.24, equal to the 50-day MA of 18.23, and equal to the 200-day MA of 17.95, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.03 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.94 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 44.82 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for OMAH.

OMAH Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$678.13M0.95%
70
Outperform
$849.63M0.35%
72
Outperform
$815.82M0.46%
74
Outperform
$793.76M0.39%
74
Outperform
$780.52M0.29%
73
Outperform
$776.58M0.18%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
18.20
1.16
6.81%
BALI
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF
MODL
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF
LRGC
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
NBCR
Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF
DSPY
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement