DSPY - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY)

Rating:73Outperform

Price Target:―

The ETF DSPY's overall rating reflects a solid mix of high-performing holdings, with Microsoft and Alphabet standing out as key contributors due to their strong financial performance, strategic investments in AI and cloud services, and positive long-term growth outlooks. Nvidia also adds strength with its focus on AI and data center expansion, though its high valuation and potential bearish momentum slightly temper its impact. However, weaker holdings like Berkshire Hathaway, which faces bearish technical momentum and lacks a dividend yield, may have modestly weighed on the fund's overall rating. Investors should note the ETF's concentration in tech-heavy holdings, which could pose risks during sector downturns.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings

Several key stocks, such as Nvidia and Broadcom, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, driving the ETF's overall returns.

Broad Sector Diversification

The ETF is spread across 11 sectors, reducing the risk of overexposure to any single industry.

Low Expense Ratio

With a competitive expense ratio of 0.18%, this ETF is cost-efficient compared to many alternatives.

Negative Factors

High Geographic Concentration

The ETF is heavily focused on U.S. companies, offering little exposure to international markets.

Overweight in Technology

Technology makes up over 27% of the portfolio, increasing vulnerability to sector-specific downturns.

Mixed Performance Among Holdings

While some top holdings have performed well, others like Apple and Amazon have shown weaker year-to-date growth.

DSPY vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM795.31M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.18%

Beta0.88

IssuerTema

Inception DateApr 01, 2025

Dividend Yield0.71%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedNo Underlying Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume1,026

30 Day Avg. Volume1,891

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

67.55

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering505

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

DSPY Summary

The Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) is an investment fund that focuses on large U.S. companies in the S&P 500, but with a unique twist—it uses historical weightings of the index since 1989 instead of current market weights. This approach aims to provide exposure to long-term growth and stability in large-cap stocks. Some well-known companies it includes are Microsoft and Nvidia. Investors might consider DSPY for diversification and a strategic edge based on historical trends. However, it’s important to know that its performance can fluctuate with the overall stock market, especially since it has significant exposure to technology companies.

How much will it cost me?The DSPY ETF has an expense ratio of 0.18%, which means you’ll pay $1.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, aiming to replicate historical weightings of the S&P 500 rather than simply tracking the index. Active management typically involves more research and strategy, which can increase costs.

What would affect this ETF?DSPY's focus on large-cap U.S. stocks, particularly in technology and financial sectors, positions it to benefit from innovation and economic growth in these areas. However, its heavy reliance on tech giants like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple could make it vulnerable to sector-specific risks, such as regulatory changes or slowing demand for tech products. Broader economic conditions, including interest rate fluctuations, could also impact financial and consumer-focused holdings.

DSPY Top 10 Holdings

The DSPY ETF leans heavily into technology, with names like Nvidia and Microsoft driving its performance thanks to their strategic focus on AI and cloud growth, though recent mixed signals in their stock movements temper enthusiasm. Tesla has been a bright spot, surging ahead with strong financial results and bullish technical indicators, while Meta Platforms has faced a rocky road, lagging due to valuation concerns and expense management challenges. With a clear U.S. focus and a tech-heavy tilt, the fund’s positioning reflects a bet on innovation but carries some volatility from uneven sector performance.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
NVDA	Nvidia	4.22%	$33.34M	$4.60T	32.07%	76 Outperform
AAPL	Apple	2.94%	$23.21M	$3.85T	6.73%	79 Outperform
MSFT	Microsoft	2.45%	$19.39M	$3.59T	12.61%	79 Outperform
AMZN	Amazon	2.16%	$17.10M	$2.58T	10.88%	71 Outperform
AVGO	Broadcom	1.73%	$13.68M	$1.63T	44.99%	76 Outperform
META	Meta Platforms	1.61%	$12.74M	$1.64T	5.79%	76 Outperform
TSLA	Tesla	1.50%	$11.88M	$1.43T	10.34%	73 Outperform
LLY	Eli Lilly & Co	1.44%	$11.41M	$1.05T	37.85%	72 Outperform
JPM	JPMorgan Chase	1.42%	$11.25M	$890.15B	35.64%	72 Outperform
BRK.B	Berkshire Hathaway B	1.39%	$11.00M	$1.07T	10.61%	66 Neutral

DSPY Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

57.88

Positive

100DMA

57.06

Positive

200DMA

Market Momentum

MACD

0.37

Negative

RSI

59.72

Neutral

STOCH

92.14

Negative

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For DSPY, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 58.55, equal to the 50-day MA of 57.88, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.37 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 59.72 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 92.14 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for DSPY.

DSPY Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
DSPY	―	―	$795.31M	0.18%	―
AVLC	―	―	$893.71M	0.15%	―
FTQI	―	―	$771.36M	0.76%	―
MODL	―	―	$734.25M	0.46%	―
LRGC	―	―	$727.40M	0.39%	―
NBCR	―	―	$703.65M	0.29%	―

Performance Comparison

DSPY

Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy

59.16

9.55

19.25%

AVLC

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

―

FTQI

First Trust Hedged BuyWrite Income ETF

―

MODL

VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF

―

LRGC

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

―

NBCR

Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents