Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
MODL - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL)
Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
High-Quality Mega-Cap Holdings
The ETF’s largest positions include many well-known, financially strong U.S. companies that are widely followed and held by institutional investors.
Broad Sector Diversification Within the U.S.
Holdings are spread across several major sectors—such as technology, financials, health care, communication services, and consumer stocks—which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Meaningful Fund Size
The ETF manages a sizable asset base, which can support trading liquidity and ongoing fund operations.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Performance
The fund has shown weak returns so far this year and over the past month, which may concern investors looking for near-term momentum.
Tech and Communication Concentration
A large portion of the portfolio is in technology and communication services stocks, increasing sensitivity to swings in these growth-oriented sectors.
Single-Country Exposure
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market struggles.
MODL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM816.62M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.46%
Beta0.94
IssuerVictoryShares
Inception DateOct 12, 2022
Dividend Yield0.69%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume66,292
30 Day Avg. Volume72,037
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
57.11Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering355
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
MODL Summary
The VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) is a fund that invests in many large, well-known U.S. companies across several sectors, with a big focus on technology, financials, health care, and communication services. It does not track a specific index, but follows a broad large‑cap U.S. stock theme. Top holdings include companies like Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), and Amazon. Someone might invest in MODL to get diversified exposure to leading U.S. blue-chip stocks in a single fund with growth potential. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward tech and large U.S. stocks, so its value can rise and fall sharply with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) has an expense ratio of 0.46%, which means you’ll pay $4.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average because it is actively managed, aiming to provide strategic exposure to large-cap stocks across various sectors. Active management often involves more research and adjustments compared to passively managed funds, which track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as strong performance from top companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact consumer spending and growth-oriented sectors like technology and communication services, which are heavily weighted in this ETF. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting large-cap U.S. companies could also pose risks to future performance.
MODL Top 10 Holdings
MODL is leaning heavily on U.S. Big Tech, with Alphabet’s twin share classes doing much of the heavy lifting as they keep rising on AI and cloud optimism. Amazon is also quietly helping, adding a steady tailwind rather than a big gust. On the flip side, Apple, Microsoft, Meta, and Nvidia have all been losing steam lately, turning what should be a tech-powered rocket into more of a choppy flight. With most of the action in U.S. mega-cap tech and communication names, financials and health care play more of a supporting role than true drivers.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 5.71% | $46.59M | $4.58T | 44.91% | 76 Outperform | |
| Apple | 5.25% | $42.81M | $4.02T | 15.94% | 79 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 4.66% | $38.07M | $3.85T | 76.64% | 85 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class C | 4.03% | $32.91M | $3.85T | 74.94% | 82 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 3.93% | $32.05M | $3.07T | 0.74% | 79 Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 3.68% | $30.00M | $1.70T | -6.64% | 76 Outperform | |
| AbbVie | 2.25% | $18.36M | $393.14B | 15.68% | 66 Neutral | |
| JPMorgan Chase | 2.25% | $18.35M | $866.44B | 16.57% | 72 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 2.05% | $16.73M | $1.61T | 45.36% | 76 Outperform | |
| Walmart | 1.96% | $16.01M | $1.01T | 22.82% | 78 Outperform |
MODL Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
47.61
Negative
47.05
Positive
44.81
Positive
Market Momentum
>-0.01
Positive
47.92
Neutral
56.88
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MODL, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 47.64, equal to the 50-day MA of 47.61, and equal to the 200-day MA of 44.81, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of >-0.01 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 47.92 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 56.88 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for MODL.
MODL Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MODL
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF
47.50
5.55
13.23%
NBCR
Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF
―
―
―
DSPY
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy
―
―
―
FTQI
First Trust Hedged BuyWrite Income ETF
―
―
―
BALI
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF
―
―
―
LRGC
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents