tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

OASC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

OASC

OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
OASC, the OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF, has a solid overall rating, suggesting it holds a generally attractive mix of small-cap stocks with a balance of strengths and some risks. Strong contributors like CNA Financial and Royalty Pharma support the fund with solid financial health, positive earnings calls, and attractive valuations, while names such as Flex and Affiliated Managers Group add growth potential through strategic initiatives and positive momentum despite some valuation and cash flow concerns. Key risks include exposure to holdings with higher debt, cash flow or profitability challenges, such as Howard Hughes Holdings and Coherent Corp, which can introduce more volatility and limit further upside.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including technology, financials, health care, and consumer-related industries, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single area.
Multiple Strong-Performing Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, particularly in technology and materials, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Negative Factors
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Some Weak Top Holdings
A few of the largest positions have shown weak or negative performance this year, which could drag on future returns if those stocks do not recover.

OASC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

OASC Summary

The OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) invests in smaller U.S. companies and does not track a traditional index, but follows a small‑cap “core” theme focused on businesses with solid values and operations. It spreads money across many sectors, including technology, financials, and health care, with holdings such as Ralph Lauren and SanDisk. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth and diversify beyond large, well-known stocks by tapping into younger, more agile companies. A key risk is that small-cap stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s price can move up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) has an expense ratio of 0.64%, meaning you’ll pay $6.40 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on small-cap companies with specific growth and value criteria.
What would affect this ETF?The OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in the U.S., especially in sectors like technology and financials, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, small-cap companies are often more sensitive to rising interest rates, economic slowdowns, or regulatory changes, which could negatively impact their growth potential. Investors should also consider sector-specific risks, such as volatility in consumer cyclical or energy markets, which could affect the ETF's performance.

OASC Top 10 Holdings

This small-cap U.S. fund leans heavily into tech and financials, with names like SanDisk, Viavi Solutions, and Flex doing much of the heavy lifting as their momentum and upbeat earnings keep the growth story alive. On the flip side, financial players such as CNA Financial and Synchrony Financial have been lagging, while Howard Hughes Holdings has felt more like a weight than a sail. With all its bets placed in U.S. small caps, the ETF is a focused play on domestic innovation, but also more exposed when individual names stumble.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
SanDisk Corp2.60%$2.18M$230.92B3628.65%
55
Neutral
Clearway Energy2.00%$1.68M$8.16B30.25%
70
Neutral
Flex1.75%$1.46M$55.66B244.99%
74
Outperform
CNA Financial1.72%$1.44M$11.81B-6.94%
79
Outperform
Coherent Corp1.62%$1.36M$73.75B395.05%
66
Neutral
Cincinnati Financial1.62%$1.36M$25.57B8.91%
76
Outperform
Howard Hughes Holdings1.60%$1.34M$3.88B-5.84%
68
Neutral
Affiliated Managers1.59%$1.33M$8.90B84.10%
74
Outperform
Royalty Pharma1.59%$1.33M$32.17B65.39%
79
Outperform
Viavi Solutions1.56%$1.31M$11.65B403.81%
71
Outperform

OASC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
32.76
Positive
100DMA
31.56
Positive
200DMA
30.16
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.35
Positive
RSI
54.43
Neutral
STOCH
18.88
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OASC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.77, equal to the 50-day MA of 32.76, and equal to the 200-day MA of 30.16, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.35 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.43 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 18.88 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for OASC.

OASC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$84.45M0.69%
69
Neutral
$86.59M0.38%
72
Outperform
$71.62M0.75%
71
Outperform
$32.04M0.75%
59
Neutral
$31.31M0.80%
71
Outperform
$25.69M0.59%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
OASC
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF
33.92
8.14
31.57%
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
SMOX
Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
BCSM
Baron SMID Cap ETF
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
IVSS
Applied Finance IVS US SMID ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement