tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

SAEF - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SAEF

Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
SAEF, the Schwab Ariel ESG ETF, earns a solid overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong core holdings and a few weaker names that introduce some risk. Higher-quality positions like Jones Lang LaSalle, Northern Trust, Brink’s, and First American Financial support the fund’s standing through solid financial performance, growth initiatives, and generally positive outlooks. However, weaker holdings such as Lindblad Expeditions and Resideo Technologies, which face leverage, profitability, and cash flow challenges, slightly weigh on the rating and highlight the risk of exposure to companies with more fragile financial health.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive short-term momentum.
Diversified Across Multiple Sectors
Holdings are spread across several industries such as industrials, consumer cyclical, technology, financials, and health care, which helps reduce reliance on any single sector.
Several Strong Top Holdings
A number of the largest positions, including companies in financials, real estate, and industrials, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Negative Factors
Higher-Than-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Concentrated in U.S. Stocks
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. market.
Mixed Results Among Top Holdings
Some of the largest positions, particularly in consumer-related and financial names, have shown weak or negative year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall results.

SAEF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SAEF Summary

The Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) is a U.S.-focused fund that invests in mid-size and smaller companies chosen for strong environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices, rather than tracking a traditional index. It spreads money across many sectors like industrials, consumer companies, and technology. Well-known holdings include Fiserv and Norwegian Cruise Line. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth while aligning their money with their values and gaining diversification beyond large, well-known stocks. A key risk is that smaller-company shares can be more volatile and can go up and down more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, which means you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because SAEF is actively managed, focusing on ESG principles and niche market opportunities.
What would affect this ETF?The Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) could benefit from increasing investor interest in ESG-focused investments and growth in mid-cap and small-cap companies, particularly in sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Technology, which are heavily weighted in this ETF. However, it may face challenges from economic slowdowns, rising interest rates, or regulatory changes that impact ESG standards or the extended market. Additionally, its U.S.-focused exposure means its performance is closely tied to domestic economic conditions.

SAEF Top 10 Holdings

This U.S.-focused ESG fund leans heavily into industrials and consumer cyclicals, and its story right now is a bit of a tug-of-war. Generac has been a bright spot, rising on solid profitability, while Lindblad Expeditions is also climbing despite its shaky balance sheet. Brink’s is another steady engine, helped by improving margins. On the other side, Norwegian Cruise Line and OneSpaWorld are lagging, acting like anchors on recent returns, and Fiserv has lost some steam. Overall, performance is being driven more by niche, mid-cap industrial and travel names than by big, familiar tech giants.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
OneSpaWorld Holdings5.34%$1.36M$1.97B-9.63%
70
Outperform
Brink's Company4.84%$1.23M$5.18B32.08%
74
Outperform
Norwegian Cruise Line4.63%$1.18M$9.46B-21.16%
64
Neutral
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings4.26%$1.08M$899.71M28.40%
53
Neutral
Resideo Technologies3.56%$906.43K$4.99B46.37%
51
Neutral
Fiserv3.11%$792.66K$34.93B-70.62%
68
Neutral
Jones Lang Lasalle2.91%$739.73K$16.82B27.03%
79
Outperform
First American Financial2.77%$705.23K$6.50B0.36%
74
Outperform
Northern2.66%$676.77K$28.41B33.63%
78
Outperform
Generac Holdings2.55%$649.34K$10.22B11.66%
59
Neutral

SAEF Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
27.72
Positive
100DMA
27.60
Positive
200DMA
26.58
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.29
Positive
RSI
54.11
Neutral
STOCH
37.70
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SAEF, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.75, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.72, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.58, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.29 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.11 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 37.70 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for SAEF.

SAEF Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$24.52M0.59%
$72.46M0.69%
$54.46M0.75%
$44.45M0.38%
$29.32M0.80%
$27.10M1.09%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SAEF
Schwab Ariel ESG ETF
28.72
1.19
4.32%
OASC
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF
SMOX
Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
MYLD
Cambria Micro and SmallCap Shareholder Yield ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement