NETL - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL)
Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum in its strategy.
Top Holdings Showing Broad Strength
Most of the largest real estate holdings have delivered steady to strong year-to-date results, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Focused Net-Lease Real Estate Exposure
By concentrating on net-lease real estate companies, the ETF offers targeted access to a specific property niche that many broad real estate funds do not emphasize.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
Nearly all assets are in the real estate sector, so the fund is heavily exposed to downturns in property markets and interest-rate-sensitive stocks.
Limited Geographic Diversification
With almost all holdings in U.S. companies, the ETF provides little international diversification and is closely tied to the U.S. economy.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can gradually reduce net returns for long-term investors.
NETL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM49.12M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.60%
Beta0.34
IssuerNETL
Inception DateMar 21, 2019
Dividend Yield4.65%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedColterpoint Net Lease Real Estate Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume6,278
30 Day Avg. Volume7,977
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
28.98Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering23
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
NETL Summary
NETL is an exchange-traded fund that follows the Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate Index, focusing on U.S. companies that own commercial properties rented out under long-term “net lease” agreements. These are often steady, rent-paying properties like stores, warehouses, and casinos. Well-known holdings include Realty Income and VICI Properties. Investors might consider NETL for diversification and potential regular income from real estate without having to buy properties directly. However, it can go up and down with the real estate market and may be hurt by rising interest rates or weak demand for commercial space.
How much will it cost me?The NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) has an expense ratio of 0.60%, which means you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 you invest. This is slightly higher than the average for ETFs because it is a specialized fund that focuses on a niche area of real estate, requiring more active management. However, this cost may be worth it for investors seeking targeted exposure to net lease real estate.
What would affect this ETF?The NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) could benefit from stable demand for net lease properties, which are known for predictable income streams and resilience during economic uncertainty. However, rising interest rates or a slowdown in the U.S. real estate market could negatively impact property values and investor sentiment, especially given its heavy exposure to U.S.-based holdings like Realty Income and W. P. Carey Inc. Regulatory changes affecting commercial real estate or tenant industries could also pose risks.
NETL Top 10 Holdings
NETL is a pure play on U.S. net-lease real estate, with performance driven by a tight cluster of heavyweight REITs. W. P. Carey and Realty Income have been rising steadily, acting as the fund’s workhorses, while Agree Realty and NNN REIT are adding a quieter but consistent lift. VICI Properties has been more mixed, occasionally losing steam as investors worry about gaming exposure. Smaller names like Getty Realty and Broadstone Net Lease are punching above their weight, helping broaden returns within this very sector-focused, U.S.-centric portfolio.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W. P. Carey Inc. | 7.95% | $3.85M | $16.71B | 24.38% | 70 Neutral | |
| NNN REIT | 7.83% | $3.79M | $8.62B | 9.68% | 78 Outperform | |
| VICI Properties | 7.67% | $3.71M | $30.36B | -8.59% | 73 Outperform | |
| Agree Realty | 7.61% | $3.68M | $9.07B | 1.58% | 75 Outperform | |
| Realty Income | 7.46% | $3.61M | $58.04B | 12.78% | 70 Outperform | |
| Innovative Industrial Properties | 4.27% | $2.07M | $1.62B | 1.53% | 69 Neutral | |
| LXP Industrial Trust | 4.19% | $2.03M | $3.08B | 24.82% | 73 Outperform | |
| Broadstone Net Lease | 4.13% | $2.00M | $3.92B | 32.27% | 61 Neutral | |
| Getty Realty | 4.03% | $1.95M | $2.03B | 17.88% | 78 Outperform | |
| NETSTREIT | 3.99% | $1.93M | $2.01B | 33.20% | 63 Neutral |
NETL Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
25.84
Positive
25.44
Positive
24.54
Positive
Market Momentum
0.11
Positive
57.62
Neutral
70.83
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NETL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.34, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.84, and equal to the 200-day MA of 24.54, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.11 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 57.62 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 70.83 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for NETL.
NETL Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
26.56
3.61
15.73%
PSR
Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund
―
―
―
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
―
―
―
BYRE
Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
PPTY
US Diversified Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
JRE
Janus Henderson U.S. Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents