Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
MLPA - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Global X MLP ETF (MLPA)
Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Top Holdings Performing Well
Most of the largest positions, including Energy Transfer, Plains All American, Sunoco, Genesis Energy, and USA Compression, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Large Asset Base
The fund manages a sizable pool of assets, which can help with trading liquidity and suggests ongoing investor interest.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With almost all assets in the energy sector, the ETF is heavily exposed to swings in energy prices and industry-specific risks.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The portfolio is almost entirely invested in U.S. companies, offering little protection if the U.S. market or energy infrastructure space weakens.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning fees take a noticeable, ongoing bite out of investor returns compared with cheaper ETFs.
MLPA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM2.05B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.45%
Beta0.35
IssuerGlobal X
Inception DateApr 18, 2012
Dividend Yield7.28%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive MLP Infrastructure Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume311,156
30 Day Avg. Volume292,532
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
53.52Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusHold
Number of Analyst Covering19
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
MLPA Summary
The Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) is a fund that follows the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index and focuses on U.S. energy infrastructure partnerships called MLPs. These companies help move, store, and process oil and gas. Well-known holdings include Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners. Investors might consider MLPA if they want potential income from high dividend payouts and exposure to the energy infrastructure theme in a single, diversified investment. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in the energy sector, so its price and income can rise or fall sharply with energy markets and related regulations.
How much will it cost me?The Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, meaning you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because it focuses on a niche area of the energy sector, which requires specialized management. However, it may appeal to investors seeking targeted exposure to energy infrastructure and income-generating MLPs.
What would affect this ETF?The Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) could benefit from rising energy demand and infrastructure investments in the U.S., as its holdings focus on transporting and processing energy commodities. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating energy prices, regulatory changes affecting MLPs, or economic slowdowns that reduce energy consumption. Its strong focus on North American energy infrastructure makes it sensitive to regional economic and policy shifts.
MLPA Top 10 Holdings
MLPA is very much an energy infrastructure story, with a tight cluster of U.S. midstream MLPs steering returns. Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners act as steady anchors, while MPLX and Plains All American have been rising more decisively, giving the fund an extra push. Sunoco and USA Compression add more zip, recently climbing and reinforcing the income-focused theme. On the flip side, Cheniere Energy Partners and Genesis Energy look more mixed, with leverage and softer trends occasionally acting like sand in the fund’s gears.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Transfer | 13.51% | $293.88M | $64.38B | -8.32% | 70 Outperform | |
| Enterprise Products Partners | 13.18% | $286.83M | $80.50B | 8.98% | 73 Outperform | |
| MPLX | 11.39% | $247.90M | $57.80B | 4.03% | 81 Outperform | |
| Western Midstream Partners | 10.77% | $234.32M | $17.72B | 4.35% | 80 Outperform | |
| Plains All American | 9.58% | $208.37M | $14.22B | -1.03% | 79 Outperform | |
| Sunoco | 8.54% | $185.88M | $9.11B | 2.64% | 72 Outperform | |
| Hess Midstream Partners | 8.53% | $185.66M | $7.62B | -10.51% | 77 Outperform | |
| Cheniere Energy Partners | 6.11% | $132.96M | $28.87B | -4.48% | 61 Neutral | |
| USA Compression | 5.22% | $113.49M | $3.75B | -6.67% | 70 Outperform | |
| Genesis Energy | 4.81% | $104.67M | $2.15B | 42.60% | 49 Neutral |
MLPA Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
49.13
Positive
47.86
Positive
47.56
Positive
Market Momentum
0.99
Negative
76.57
Negative
80.92
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MLPA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 50.86, equal to the 50-day MA of 49.13, and equal to the 200-day MA of 47.56, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.99 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 76.57 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 80.92 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MLPA.
MLPA Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
52.86
3.36
6.79%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
―
―
―
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
―
―
―
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
―
―
―
IYE
iShares U.S. Energy ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents