tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

MLPA - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

MLPA

Global X MLP ETF (MLPA)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
MLPA, the Global X MLP ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because its biggest positions like MPLX and Western Midstream Partners show strong financial performance, attractive valuations, and supportive dividends, which provide income and stability for the fund. Additional support comes from holdings such as Plains All American and Hess Midstream, which combine solid operations with high yields, though leverage and certain operational challenges add some caution. The main risks come from weaker names like Genesis Energy and more leveraged holdings such as Cheniere Energy Partners, and from the fund’s concentration in the energy midstream sector, which can make it sensitive to industry-specific downturns.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Top Holdings Performing Well
Most of the largest positions, including Energy Transfer, Plains All American, Sunoco, Genesis Energy, and USA Compression, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Large Asset Base
The fund manages a sizable pool of assets, which can help with trading liquidity and suggests ongoing investor interest.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With almost all assets in the energy sector, the ETF is heavily exposed to swings in energy prices and industry-specific risks.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The portfolio is almost entirely invested in U.S. companies, offering little protection if the U.S. market or energy infrastructure space weakens.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning fees take a noticeable, ongoing bite out of investor returns compared with cheaper ETFs.

MLPA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

MLPA Summary

The Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) is a fund that follows the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index and focuses on U.S. energy infrastructure partnerships called MLPs. These companies help move, store, and process oil and gas. Well-known holdings include Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners. Investors might consider MLPA if they want potential income from high dividend payouts and exposure to the energy infrastructure theme in a single, diversified investment. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in the energy sector, so its price and income can rise or fall sharply with energy markets and related regulations.
How much will it cost me?The Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, meaning you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because it focuses on a niche area of the energy sector, which requires specialized management. However, it may appeal to investors seeking targeted exposure to energy infrastructure and income-generating MLPs.
What would affect this ETF?The Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) could benefit from rising energy demand and infrastructure investments in the U.S., as its holdings focus on transporting and processing energy commodities. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating energy prices, regulatory changes affecting MLPs, or economic slowdowns that reduce energy consumption. Its strong focus on North American energy infrastructure makes it sensitive to regional economic and policy shifts.

MLPA Top 10 Holdings

MLPA is very much an energy infrastructure story, with a tight cluster of U.S. midstream MLPs steering returns. Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners act as steady anchors, while MPLX and Plains All American have been rising more decisively, giving the fund an extra push. Sunoco and USA Compression add more zip, recently climbing and reinforcing the income-focused theme. On the flip side, Cheniere Energy Partners and Genesis Energy look more mixed, with leverage and softer trends occasionally acting like sand in the fund’s gears.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Energy Transfer13.41%$284.98M$61.66B-11.79%
70
Outperform
Enterprise Products Partners12.40%$263.43M$71.50B-1.60%
73
Outperform
MPLX11.59%$246.33M$55.70B8.09%
81
Outperform
Western Midstream Partners10.32%$219.32M$16.57B-2.10%
80
Outperform
Plains All American10.14%$215.48M$13.62B-5.94%
79
Outperform
Sunoco8.48%$180.10M$8.82B4.38%
72
Outperform
Hess Midstream Partners8.28%$175.98M$7.30B-12.84%
77
Outperform
Cheniere Energy Partners6.22%$132.16M$27.43B-3.96%
61
Neutral
Genesis Energy4.87%$103.46M$2.06B64.33%
49
Neutral
USA Compression4.72%$100.39M$3.06B2.26%
70
Outperform

MLPA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
49.00
Positive
100DMA
48.20
Positive
200DMA
48.09
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.64
Negative
RSI
71.83
Negative
STOCH
82.64
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MLPA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 49.66, equal to the 50-day MA of 49.00, and equal to the 200-day MA of 48.09, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.64 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 71.83 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 82.64 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MLPA.

MLPA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.98B0.45%
$7.78B0.09%
$2.75B0.45%
$2.15B0.35%
$1.45B0.08%
$1.25B0.38%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
51.11
1.43
2.88%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
IYE
iShares U.S. Energy ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement