tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

JDOC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

JDOC

JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
JDOC, the JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF, appears to be a solid-quality healthcare fund, largely supported by strong, diversified leaders like Johnson & Johnson, Merck, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Medtronic, all of which show robust financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and strategic pipelines or innovation plans. The rating is held back somewhat by risks such as high valuations, leverage and debt concerns, and pockets of operational or segment challenges at several holdings, as well as some signs that a few stocks may be overvalued or nearing overbought territory, making valuation the main risk factor to watch.
Positive Factors
Recent Performance Momentum
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month and quarter, suggesting positive short-term momentum in its strategy.
Leading Healthcare Holdings
Several major positions like Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Danaher, and Roche have delivered solid gains, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Global Healthcare Exposure
While most holdings are U.S.-based, the fund also includes meaningful positions in countries like Switzerland, the UK, Japan, and others, adding some international diversification within healthcare.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With almost all assets in the healthcare sector, the ETF is heavily exposed to industry-specific risks such as regulatory changes or reimbursement pressures.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some large positions, such as AbbVie and AstraZeneca, have been weak so far this year, which can drag on overall fund performance.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of going to investors.

JDOC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

JDOC Summary

JDOC, the JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF, focuses on the healthcare sector rather than tracking a broad market index. It invests in major healthcare companies involved in drugs, medical devices, and health services, including well-known names like Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson. Investors might consider JDOC if they want targeted exposure to potential long-term growth driven by aging populations and rising global healthcare spending, while still holding a mix of different healthcare businesses. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in healthcare, so its value can rise or fall sharply with changes in that single sector.
How much will it cost me?The JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) has an expense ratio of 0.65%, meaning you’ll pay $6.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a specialized sector like healthcare, which requires more research and expertise.
What would affect this ETF?The JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) could benefit from rising global healthcare spending, advancements in medical technology, and an aging population driving demand for pharmaceuticals and healthcare services. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, patent expirations for major drug companies, or economic downturns that could impact healthcare budgets globally. Its focus on leading healthcare companies like Johnson & Johnson and Eli Lilly positions it well for growth but also exposes it to risks tied to sector-specific developments.

JDOC Top 10 Holdings

JDOC is a pure healthcare play, and its story right now is one of big drugmakers setting the tone. Johnson & Johnson and Merck are the steadier hands, helping to prop up returns with relatively resilient performance. On the other side, heavyweights Eli Lilly and AbbVie have been losing steam, while UnitedHealth and Medtronic are also lagging and acting like a brake on the fund. With nearly all its firepower in global pharma, biotech, and medical devices, JDOC is highly concentrated in healthcare leaders rather than broader market trends.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Johnson & Johnson9.03%$741.88K$589.08B57.34%
78
Outperform
AbbVie6.89%$565.59K$384.56B5.44%
66
Neutral
Eli Lilly & Co6.65%$546.27K$869.02B12.41%
72
Outperform
Merck & Company4.97%$408.05K$297.40B38.07%
80
Outperform
AstraZeneca4.67%$383.58K$301.53B29.24%
80
Outperform
UnitedHealth3.78%$310.13K$245.61B-48.28%
72
Outperform
Bristol-Myers Squibb3.49%$286.51K$123.51B1.76%
78
Outperform
Medtronic3.02%$248.37K$111.25B-2.49%
80
Outperform
Roche Holding AG2.68%$220.16K$315.49B12.61%
73
Outperform
Danaher2.59%$212.31K$134.07B-7.58%
75
Outperform

JDOC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
57.56
Negative
100DMA
57.56
Negative
200DMA
54.38
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.89
Negative
RSI
46.52
Neutral
STOCH
45.93
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For JDOC, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 55.65, equal to the 50-day MA of 57.56, and equal to the 200-day MA of 54.38, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.89 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 46.52 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 45.93 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for JDOC.

JDOC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$9.48M0.65%
66
Neutral
$56.54M0.50%
60
Neutral
$25.68M0.80%
62
Neutral
$17.97M0.44%
65
Neutral
$17.76M0.85%
65
Neutral
$10.30M0.55%
67
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
JDOC
JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF
56.03
4.10
7.90%
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
TMED
T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
BMED
Future Health ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement