tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

JDOC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

JDOC

JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC)

Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:
JDOC, the JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects its focus on high-quality healthcare companies with generally strong financial performance and growth prospects. Major holdings like Merck, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, and Eli Lilly support the fund’s quality through robust earnings, promising pipelines, and strategic initiatives, while CVS is a weaker spot due to profitability challenges, leverage, and bearish technical signals. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in the healthcare sector, which can make it more sensitive to industry-specific issues such as regulatory changes and drug pricing pressures.
Positive Factors
Many Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including well-known healthcare leaders, have shown solid gains this year, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Global Healthcare Exposure
While most assets are in U.S. companies, the fund also holds healthcare stocks from countries like Japan, Switzerland, Germany, Israel, and the UK, adding some international diversification.
Focus on Established Healthcare Companies
The ETF concentrates on large, established healthcare firms, which can offer more stability than smaller, more speculative names in the sector.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
Nearly all of the fund is invested in healthcare, so its performance is heavily tied to how this single sector behaves.
Mixed Recent Performance
The ETF has had a weak year-to-date and three-month stretch, with several key holdings lagging and weighing on returns despite a recent one-month rebound.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of going to investors.

JDOC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

JDOC Summary

The JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) is a fund that focuses on the healthcare sector rather than tracking a broad market index. It invests mainly in U.S. healthcare companies involved in drugs, medical devices, and health services. Well-known holdings include Johnson & Johnson and Eli Lilly. Someone might consider JDOC if they want targeted exposure to healthcare, a sector that can benefit from an aging population and ongoing medical innovation, while still spreading money across many companies. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in healthcare, so its value can rise or fall sharply with news and trends in that single sector.
How much will it cost me?The JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) has an expense ratio of 0.65%, meaning you’ll pay $6.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a specialized sector like healthcare, which requires more research and expertise.
What would affect this ETF?The JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) could benefit from rising global healthcare spending, advancements in medical technology, and an aging population driving demand for pharmaceuticals and healthcare services. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, patent expirations for major drug companies, or economic downturns that could impact healthcare budgets globally. Its focus on leading healthcare companies like Johnson & Johnson and Eli Lilly positions it well for growth but also exposes it to risks tied to sector-specific developments.

JDOC Top 10 Holdings

JDOC is firmly hitched to Big Pharma and U.S.-centric healthcare giants, with Eli Lilly, AbbVie, and UnitedHealth doing most of the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising on strong earnings and growth stories. CVS has also been climbing, adding a bit of retail and insurance flavor to the mix. On the flip side, Merck and AstraZeneca have been more of a headwind lately, with their stocks losing steam. Overall, this is a concentrated bet on large, global drugmakers and health insurers, with performance driven by a handful of heavyweight names.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Eli Lilly & Co8.01%$744.13K$1.14T58.88%
72
Outperform
AbbVie7.97%$740.92K$461.26B34.19%
66
Neutral
UnitedHealth6.22%$577.64K$386.29B35.84%
72
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson4.95%$459.79K$633.19B71.54%
78
Outperform
Merck & Company4.68%$435.19K$319.99B58.36%
80
Outperform
AstraZeneca4.20%$390.53K$300.37B37.99%
80
Outperform
Thermo Fisher3.32%$308.83K$194.52B21.22%
72
Outperform
Bristol-Myers Squibb3.10%$288.44K$118.71B23.24%
78
Outperform
CVS Health3.06%$284.21K$133.62B55.86%
64
Neutral
Abbott Laboratories2.74%$254.62K$166.17B-28.13%
73
Outperform

JDOC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
56.85
Positive
100DMA
56.78
Positive
200DMA
56.53
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.36
Negative
RSI
71.93
Negative
STOCH
94.70
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For JDOC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 58.63, equal to the 50-day MA of 56.85, and equal to the 200-day MA of 56.53, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.36 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 71.93 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 94.70 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for JDOC.

JDOC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$9.18M0.65%
64
Neutral
$47.09M0.50%
58
Neutral
$43.36M0.80%
62
Neutral
$23.13M0.44%
64
Neutral
$18.91M0.85%
65
Neutral
$11.05M0.55%
64
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
JDOC
JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF
62.03
11.57
22.93%
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
TMED
T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
BMED
Future Health ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement