tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

BMED - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

BMED

Future Health ETF (BMED)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
BMED, the Future Health ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by strong, diversified healthcare leaders like Merck, Johnson & Johnson, and Edwards Lifesciences, which benefit from robust financial performance, positive earnings calls, and promising pipelines or product growth. These strengths are partly offset by holdings such as McKesson and Cencora, where high leverage, weaker technical trends, and valuation concerns introduce more risk. The main risk factor for the ETF is its concentration in healthcare names that, while generally strong, include several companies with high valuations and leverage that could amplify volatility if market conditions worsen.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past three months and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Health Care Holdings
Several top positions, including well-known global health care companies, have delivered strong or steady performance that supports the fund.
Global Health Care Exposure
While focused on the U.S., the fund also holds meaningful positions in major international markets like Switzerland, Germany, and Japan, adding some geographic diversification.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in health care, the ETF is heavily exposed to risks specific to that single sector.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which can gradually reduce net returns for long-term investors.
Small Asset Base
The relatively low level of assets under management may lead to lower trading volume and potentially wider bid-ask spreads for investors.

BMED vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

BMED Summary

The Future Health ETF (BMED) focuses on the health care theme, investing in companies working on new drugs, medical devices, and advanced health services, mainly in the U.S. It does not track a traditional index, but instead selects a mix of established names and innovators. Well-known holdings include Johnson & Johnson and Merck. Someone might invest in BMED to seek long-term growth from medical breakthroughs while spreading risk across many health care companies. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in the health care sector, so its price can rise or fall sharply with changes in that industry.
How much will it cost me?The Future Health ETF (Ticker: BMED) has an expense ratio of 0.85%, meaning you’ll pay $8.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a specialized sector like health care innovation, which typically requires more research and management expertise.
What would affect this ETF?The Future Health ETF (BMED) could benefit from ongoing advancements in biotechnology and medical devices, as well as increased global demand for innovative health care solutions. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in the health care sector or economic downturns that reduce funding for medical innovation. Its global exposure and focus on leading companies like Abbott Laboratories and Johnson & Johnson provide stability but also make it sensitive to international market conditions.

BMED Top 10 Holdings

BMED is a pure play on global health innovation, with big drugmakers and cutting‑edge diagnostics sharing the spotlight. Steady climbers like Johnson & Johnson, Roche, Novartis, and Biogen are doing much of the heavy lifting, helped by solid pipelines and upbeat earnings. Gilead is also rising, adding some extra fuel. On the flip side, Guardant Health, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic have been lagging lately, acting as a bit of a brake. Moderna is a wild card: volatile but currently supportive, giving the fund a higher‑octane feel within a still diversified health‑care mix.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Johnson & Johnson7.82%$824.71K$583.29B48.50%
78
Outperform
Amgen4.71%$496.60K$198.26B17.64%
77
Outperform
Intuitive Surgical4.66%$491.39K$170.20B0.52%
78
Outperform
Edwards Lifesciences4.52%$477.01K$49.14B24.52%
79
Outperform
Merck & Company4.50%$475.07K$286.57B22.38%
80
Outperform
McKesson4.40%$464.34K$115.67B46.71%
62
Neutral
Cencora4.34%$458.19K$68.60B37.75%
70
Neutral
Gilead Sciences3.48%$367.19K$180.27B28.11%
78
Outperform
Danaher3.44%$362.81K$131.71B-8.74%
75
Outperform
Wuxi Biologics (Cayman)3.25%$342.58KHK$145.31B53.85%
63
Neutral

BMED Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
30.76
Negative
100DMA
30.16
Negative
200DMA
27.90
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.48
Positive
RSI
27.40
Positive
STOCH
4.79
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BMED, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 30.24, equal to the 50-day MA of 30.76, and equal to the 200-day MA of 27.90, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.48 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 27.40 is Positive, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 4.79 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for BMED.

BMED Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$10.38M0.55%
67
Neutral
$58.86M0.50%
60
Neutral
$28.26M0.80%
62
Neutral
$19.42M0.85%
66
Neutral
$19.32M0.44%
65
Neutral
$8.53M0.65%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
BMED
Future Health ETF
28.63
3.43
13.61%
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
MEDI
Harbor Health Care ETF
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
TMED
T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF
JDOC
JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement