tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

IYM - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

IYM

iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
The iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) has a solid overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong and moderate-performing holdings. Newmont Mining (NEM), one of the largest holdings, contributes positively with robust profitability, efficient operations, and a bullish technical outlook, enhancing the fund's appeal. However, stocks like Air Products and Chemicals (APD) weigh on the rating due to financial challenges and bearish technical signals. The ETF's concentration in the basic materials sector may expose it to risks tied to commodity price fluctuations and global economic conditions.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several top holdings, like AngloGold Ashanti and Steel Dynamics, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.
Sector Focus on Materials
The ETF's heavy exposure to the materials sector benefits from demand in industries like mining and chemicals, which can perform well during economic growth.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The fund's expense ratio is competitive compared to many sector-focused ETFs, helping investors retain more of their returns.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Top Holdings
The ETF's largest position, Linde, makes up over 20% of the portfolio, increasing risk if this stock underperforms.
Weak Recent Performance
The ETF has experienced negative returns over the past one and three months, indicating short-term struggles.
Limited Geographic Diversification
With nearly all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund lacks exposure to international markets, reducing protection against global opportunities or risks.

IYM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

IYM Summary

The iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) is an investment fund that focuses on companies in the U.S. basic materials sector, such as chemicals, metals, and forestry products. It tracks the Russell 1000 Basic Materials Index and includes well-known companies like Linde and Newmont Mining. This ETF could be a good choice for investors looking to diversify their portfolio or benefit from the steady demand for raw materials, which are essential to many industries. However, new investors should be aware that the ETF’s performance can fluctuate with changes in the materials sector, which is influenced by global economic conditions.
How much will it cost me?The iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) has an expense ratio of 0.38%, meaning you’ll pay $3.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is focused on a specific sector and requires more active management compared to broad-market index funds.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) could benefit from increased global demand for raw materials, driven by infrastructure projects and industrial growth, as well as its potential to act as a hedge against inflation. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for companies in the sector, and potential regulatory changes or environmental concerns affecting mining and chemical production. Its heavy exposure to the U.S. market and reliance on top holdings like Linde and Newmont Mining also make it sensitive to domestic economic conditions.

IYM Top 10 Holdings

The iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) leans heavily into the materials sector, with names like Linde and Newmont Mining shaping its performance. Linde has been steady but faces bearish momentum and valuation concerns, while Newmont Mining is rising on strong profitability and efficient operations. Freeport-McMoRan adds a boost with positive technical momentum, though operational risks linger. On the downside, Air Products and Chemicals is dragging the fund with bearish signals and financial challenges. Overall, the ETF’s U.S.-focused portfolio is a bet on raw materials, with mining stocks leading the charge.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Linde18.53%$112.53M$196.79B0.28%
66
Neutral
Newmont Mining10.91%$66.28M$110.53B174.84%
81
Outperform
Freeport-McMoRan7.07%$42.93M$70.58B29.02%
67
Neutral
Ecolab6.59%$39.99M$74.66B11.83%
66
Neutral
Anglogold Ashanti PLC4.18%$25.38M$43.52B280.39%
73
Outperform
Air Products and Chemicals3.54%$21.50M$53.41B-16.61%
46
Neutral
Nucor3.51%$21.34M$36.42B40.86%
74
Outperform
Fastenal Company3.47%$21.07M$48.62B12.11%
72
Outperform
Steel Dynamics3.47%$21.05M$25.45B51.84%
76
Outperform
Royal Gold2.73%$16.56M$19.21B74.14%
78
Outperform

IYM Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
146.33
Positive
100DMA
146.20
Positive
200DMA
140.23
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
2.41
Negative
RSI
71.34
Negative
STOCH
87.70
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For IYM, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 149.37, equal to the 50-day MA of 146.33, and equal to the 200-day MA of 140.23, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 2.41 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 71.34 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 87.70 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for IYM.

IYM Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$607.73M0.38%
$932.82M0.62%
$914.32M0.18%
$445.86M0.08%
$209.40M0.62%
$153.88M0.40%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
IYM
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
156.39
26.74
20.62%
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
IETC
iShares Evolved US Technology ETF
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
FXZ
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund
RSPM
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement