IJJ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ)
Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, showing solid momentum in its mid-cap value strategy.
Leading Holdings with Strong Returns
Several of the largest positions, including US Foods, Reliance Steel, TD SYNNEX, and multiple energy names, have shown strong performance, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund is spread across many sectors such as financials, industrials, consumer cyclical, real estate, technology, and energy, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering very limited geographic diversification outside the United States.
Exposure to Lagging Real Estate Holding
One of the top real estate holdings, Jones Lang Lasalle, has shown weak recent performance, which can slightly drag on the fund’s returns.
Value and Mid-Cap Market Sensitivity
Because the ETF focuses on mid-sized value stocks, it can be more sensitive to economic cycles and investor sentiment toward value shares compared with broad market funds.
IJJ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM8.84B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.18%
Beta0.83
IssueriShares
Inception DateJul 24, 2000
Dividend Yield1.59%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P Mid Cap 400 Value
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume155,700
30 Day Avg. Volume174,936
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
168.62Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering297
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
IJJ Summary
IJJ is the iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF, which follows an index of mid-sized U.S. companies that are considered “value” stocks—businesses that may be undervalued compared with their earnings and assets. It holds a wide mix of sectors like financials, industrials, and consumer companies, including names such as US Foods Holding and Reliance Steel. Investors might consider IJJ for diversification beyond large caps and for potential long-term growth from solid, established mid-size companies. A key risk is that these stocks can still go up and down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) has an expense ratio of 0.18%, meaning you’ll pay $1.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is lower than average for actively managed funds because it is passively managed, tracking the S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index to keep expenses down.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF could benefit from a strong U.S. economy, as mid-cap companies often thrive during periods of economic growth, particularly in sectors like financials and industrials, which have significant weight in this fund. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact these sectors and the real estate holdings, while regulatory changes in industries like energy or healthcare might also pose risks. Investors should monitor economic conditions and sector-specific developments to assess potential impacts on this ETF.
IJJ Top 10 Holdings
IJJ leans into U.S. mid-cap value, with financials, industrials, and energy names doing most of the heavy lifting. Reliance Steel and Wesco International have been rising, giving the fund a solid industrial backbone, while Ovintiv and Permian Resources add punch from the energy patch as they ride stronger commodity sentiment. On the consumer side, US Foods and Performance Food Group are steady contributors, though their gains are more modest. Annaly Capital, a mortgage REIT, has been lagging, acting like a small anchor on an otherwise forward-moving, domestically focused portfolio.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US Foods Holding | 1.27% | $112.11M | $22.15B | 20.78% | 74 Outperform | |
| Reliance Steel | 1.19% | $104.92M | $20.73B | 43.28% | 74 Outperform | |
| TD SYNNEX Corporation | 1.10% | $96.76M | $20.45B | 81.54% | 73 Outperform | |
| Performance Food Group | 1.03% | $90.96M | $17.97B | 13.82% | 65 Neutral | |
| Ovintiv | 0.99% | $87.08M | C$24.12B | 58.45% | 60 Neutral | |
| Permian Resources | 0.96% | $84.91M | $17.84B | 56.12% | 81 Outperform | |
| Wesco International | 0.96% | $84.70M | $16.74B | 68.80% | 75 Outperform | |
| Annaly Capital | 0.96% | $84.28M | $17.12B | 10.78% | 63 Neutral | |
| Jones Lang Lasalle | 0.95% | $83.39M | $16.33B | 33.80% | 79 Outperform | |
| Pinnacle Financial Partners | 0.91% | $80.12M | $15.90B | 22.18% | 73 Outperform |
IJJ Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
145.24
Positive
140.75
Positive
136.85
Positive
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For IJJ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 147.31, equal to the 50-day MA of 145.24, and equal to the 200-day MA of 136.85, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for IJJ.
IJJ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
147.84
25.91
21.25%
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
―
―
―
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
―
―
―
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents