tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

IJJ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

IJJ

iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) has a solid overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong-performing holdings and some weaker contributors. Top holdings like Alcoa (AA) and Fidelity National Financial (FNF) stand out due to their strong financial performance, strategic growth initiatives, and reasonable valuations, which positively impact the fund's rating. However, weaker holdings such as Talen Energy (TLN), which faces financial challenges and valuation concerns, and Annaly Capital (NLY), with risks from high leverage and declining profitability, slightly weigh on the overall score. The fund's main risk lies in its exposure to holdings with high leverage or valuation concerns, which could affect performance in volatile markets.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several top holdings, like Flex and NEXTracker, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund's overall returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across 11 sectors, reducing the impact of downturns in any single industry.
Low Expense Ratio
With a low expense ratio of 0.18%, this ETF is cost-efficient compared to many similar funds.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
The ETF is heavily focused on U.S. companies, with over 99% exposure, limiting diversification across global markets.
Mixed Performance Among Holdings
Some holdings, like Reinsurance Group and Reliance Steel, have shown weak or flat year-to-date performance, which could drag on overall returns.
Heavy Financial Sector Exposure
The fund's largest sector allocation is to financials, which could make it vulnerable to sector-specific risks.

IJJ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

IJJ Summary

The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) is an investment fund that focuses on mid-sized U.S. companies with strong value characteristics, such as low price-to-earnings ratios. It follows the S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index and includes companies like Flex and US Foods Holding. This ETF is a great choice for investors looking to diversify their portfolio with mid-cap stocks that have potential for long-term growth and stability. However, new investors should be aware that the ETF’s performance can fluctuate with the overall market, especially since it is heavily focused on U.S. mid-cap stocks.
How much will it cost me?The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) has an expense ratio of 0.18%, meaning you’ll pay $1.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is lower than average for actively managed funds because it is passively managed, tracking the S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index to keep expenses down.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF could benefit from a strong U.S. economy, as mid-cap companies often thrive during periods of economic growth, particularly in sectors like financials and industrials, which have significant weight in this fund. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact these sectors and the real estate holdings, while regulatory changes in industries like energy or healthcare might also pose risks. Investors should monitor economic conditions and sector-specific developments to assess potential impacts on this ETF.

IJJ Top 10 Holdings

The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF leans heavily on U.S. mid-cap value stocks, with a notable tilt toward financials and industrials. Alcoa has been a standout performer, riding a wave of strong financial recovery and bullish momentum, while Flex has also contributed steady gains thanks to its strategic growth initiatives. On the flip side, Fidelity National Financial and Performance Food Group have been lagging, weighed down by operational challenges and cautious technical signals. This fund’s sector diversity provides balance, but its reliance on value-oriented names means performance hinges on broader economic trends.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
US Foods Holding1.04%$85.07M$17.14B10.41%
74
Outperform
Jones Lang Lasalle1.03%$84.34M$16.54B42.26%
79
Outperform
Alcoa1.00%$82.26M$16.46B74.28%
76
Outperform
Annaly Capital0.97%$79.67M$15.87B24.47%
63
Neutral
Reliance Steel0.97%$79.43M$15.68B12.17%
74
Outperform
Pinnacle Financial Partners0.89%$72.60M$14.77B-17.13%
73
Outperform
Fidelity National Financial0.88%$71.98M$15.34B-0.36%
74
Outperform
Performance Food Group0.83%$68.21M$13.72B0.08%
65
Neutral
Reinsurance Group0.82%$66.86M$13.27B-9.38%
74
Outperform
Ally Financial0.81%$66.12M$14.50B30.72%
67
Neutral

IJJ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
130.23
Positive
100DMA
129.46
Positive
200DMA
124.26
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.19
Negative
RSI
59.85
Neutral
STOCH
83.85
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For IJJ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 133.46, equal to the 50-day MA of 130.23, and equal to the 200-day MA of 124.26, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.19 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 59.85 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 83.85 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for IJJ.

IJJ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$8.27B0.18%
$9.37B0.17%
$5.17B0.35%
$5.14B0.25%
$2.48B0.15%
$1.15B0.10%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
135.03
13.91
11.48%
IJK
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement